svl7

Ticket ID: 1870 Priority: Low \r\n\r\nIt\'s basically a 780m with higher clocks. Full GK104, i.e. same chip as used in the GTX 680 / 770.\r\n\r\nThanks!

Ticket ID: 1795 Priority: Low Can you please add the Nvidia Quadro K2000m to the database?\r\n\r\nHere\'s a GPU-Z screenshot: \r\n

Cheers!

Yes I read the thread, and I don't see what you really want or would make you happy. On one hand you say that you want separate categories, and on the other hand you come up with the "same hardware" argument just as here: For me it seems as if you simply like to act as kind of "hwbot cop", reporting tons of submissions just because you're not happy with the definitions of certain categories. That approach doesn't make sense, if all those submissions needs moderation then it's necessary to clean up the categories in advance, so that they can get moved to the proper place. Else the involved moderation work is just a waste of time. So what we need are clearly defined categories for the concerned hardware, and we need this *before* reporting random dozens of random submissions, as this won't help anyone at all. How about finishing your list in post #34, it looked like a good start to me...

This kind of argumentation is void. If you take a closer look at mobile hardware you will notice that many parts have their desktop equivalent, e.g. the GTX 680m uses the exactly same ASIC as the desktop GTX 670 and yet it is out of the question to put both in the same category, for very well reasons. The mobile i7 920XM is equivalent to the desktop i7 920 when you look at the ASIC, and again - both have its own categories. Some parts are even exactly the same except for their stock clocks, e.g. 5850m vs 5870m and yet they are not in the same category either, once again, for good reason. It's totally pointless to start moving mobile parts in the same category with its desktop equivalents, mobile and desktop are two completely different worlds. You realizing that it is usual for chip manufacturers to have mobile and desktop applications for their products is no reason to make "same hardware" the only criteria for a category. Or should we put the GTX 680 in the same category as the GTX770 as well?

Ticket ID: 1717 Priority: Low Please add the AMD Radeon HD 8970m to the hardware database.\r\nIt\'s not yet completely recognized by GPU-Z, but the displayed data is correct.\r\nGPU-Z validation: http://www.techpowerup.com/gpuz/6mcs9/\r\n\r\nThank you!

I need a stronger CPU, can't keep up with your physics score...

Currently fastest mobile GPU on the world... in your system! Hahaha cheers!!

Ticket ID: 1560 Priority: Low Could you please add the Intel Core i7 3517U CPU to the database?\r\nAll details about the CPU can be found here:\r\nhttp://ark.intel.com/products/65714/Intel-Core-i7-3517U-Processor-(4M-Cache-up-to-3_00-GHz)\r\n\r\nThanks in advance!

Ticket ID: 1520 Priority: Low Could you please add the AMD 7970m to the database?\r\nHere\'s a screenshot of GPU-Z (http://gpuz.techpowerup.com/12/05/16/392.png) You\'ll notice that the card is not totally completely supported by GPU-Z yet, but I assume this is going to be fixed in the near future. \r\nThanks!

Hey, could you please add the mobo of the Alienware M18x to the databases? The mobo is a requirement for the reference clock benches proofs. Here's a pic of CPU-Z: http://img98.imageshack.us/img98/8352/m18xmobo.png Thanks!

Excellent run Jimbo!!! Hail to the T|I desktop king!

Ticket ID: 1394 Priority: Low Could you please add the AMD FirePro M8900 video card?\r\nHere\'s a GPU-Z screenshot: http://gpuz.techpowerup.com/11/09/24/80y.png\r\n\r\nThanks a lot!!

Awesome run Jimbo!Keep it up!!

Hi I created the Tech|Inferno team a while ago, but there's no team captain and no way for me to change the team profile settings, maybe I missed some settings when creating the team... Anyway, can you give me Team Captain rights? Thanks in advance! svl7