Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

Strunkenbold

Crew
  • Posts

    2088
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    22

Strunkenbold last won the day on May 19

Strunkenbold had the most liked content!

Converted

  • Location
    GERMANY

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

Strunkenbold's Achievements

Explorer

Explorer (4/14)

  • Dedicated Rare
  • Conversation Starter Rare
  • Reacting Well Rare
  • Very Popular Rare
  • First Post Rare

Recent Badges

363

Reputation

  1. https://hwbot.org/hardware/videocard/geforce4_mx_440_8x_pci/
  2. If thats really the plan, then we don't need discuss this much further, as single core results will be in the long run in the same category anyway. There is no reason to make a difference between FX and AL as its the same logic. The base category should have all single core results and we should move results from the p cores.
  3. Well with logic we have sometimes our problems here. Even I struggle sometimes, after all those years (ok this might be a problem I have in general). I always thought one of the unwritten rules was to don't create extra categories for the same named hardware even when some new revision brings new features like 64 bit or a die shrink. We always said its up to the overclocker benching with the best silicon available. Now having two categories for single thread results just because something is disabled or enabled pretty much breaks the mentioned logic. I always thought those new categories are just an intermediate step because of the limitations of the current code but if they keep existing in parallel I'm lost. Its okay to try something new with the hybrid stuff but please consider merging base and p cores categories when code is ready and let the user choose upon submission entering if he disabled e cores so the submission goes into e.g. 8 or 16 cores category just like unlocking a Phenom X2 goes into 3 or 4 cores hardware category.
  4. IMO all single core results have to go into the base category because the overclocker needs to choose which way is the fastest and we really dont want to give double points for same hardware. We should probably already start to moderate those categories and move all single thread results from the p cores categories. Later this needs to be handled with some new code. Those double categories arent the best thing yet. We likely want to have only one category per CPU. Maybe its possible to have something similar like the unlocked K10 CPUs.
  5. Notebook and Desktop version have zero difference in the name but we have two different hardware categories. The name got probably matched to the desktop category thus leading to the problem that the notebook variant gets linked to the desktop category. Technically we have to remove the match of the name string. For now all users need to edit their subs to change to the correct GPU.
  6. Issue found: In our db, Socket 940 wasn't configured to be able to host multiple CPUs. I fixed this now. It should be possible for you to change core count of your submission if you try to edit. @Leeghoofd The idea of those configuration for multi sockets was to prevent users entering wrong core counts for CPUs, like a quad core getting 16 core because user thinks he needs to select 4 x XYZ CPU on the submission page. Now it seems the mechanic behind this is broken as I still can select a different core count for single CPU systems when I make a submission for the first time.
  7. Core configuration is correct except i7 12700KF (8P) which was still at 12 cores. Fixed this now. i9 12900 is 8P + 8E = 16 i7 12700 is 8P + 4E = 12 i5 12600K is 6P + 4E = 10 i5 12600 and below just have performance cores
  8. Please don't submit in categories not belonging to your hardware. Cezanne is almost twice as fast than Raven Ridge.
  9. I have to agree that I kind of added those those new Ryzen APUs in a rush. I add those mobile categories in the future, when I have time.
  10. https://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/exynos_7904/ https://hwbot.org/hardware/videocard/mali_g71_mp2/
  11. https://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/snapdragon_660_sdm660/ https://hwbot.org/hardware/videocard/adreno_512/ https://hwbot.org/hardware/diskproduct/ssd_750/
  12. Super hard on this one, I dont find any information that this CPU has a GT2 graphics part. I suspect this is a GPU-Z detection problem / bug. For now its correct to submit in the existing category.
  13. Quick solution would be to just automatically launching those two CPU-Z windows when you click on save result in BM. Guess this would be no big deal for @_mat_ to implement, wouldnt it?
×
×
  • Create New...