
RomanLV
Members-
Posts
82 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Everything posted by RomanLV
-
My main opinion is the same - there should be no exceptions. I'm not against the division, and I'm not against unification. But there should not be that one person created category just for 500MHz processor, but do not created all the rest the line processors Should not be created category "Mobile K6-III-P" processor, but do not created "Mobile K6-2" processors (eg), ets. or all, or nothing!
-
PS Thank you for the correction of base (аixed all my comments seem ) PSPS But here is another one drawback found http://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/mobile_k6_2_p_500_mhz/ There are still many mobile AMD (K6-2-P): http://www.cpu-world.com/CPUs/K6-2/TYPE-Mobile%20K6-2-P.html Please add them all (or remove kotori`s k6-2-500) thx
-
Marking the videocard - 16MB marking memory (KM4132G4112Q) - 32Mbit = 4Mbyte (*4chips =16Mbyte) http://www.datasheetarchive.com/dlmain/Datasheets-110/DSAP004913.pdf Conclusion - bug (videocard or program) or fault of ram (or GPU) But there is another variant. I can a specially change the size of memory (but I could not do it directly on this ASUS 3800 (was made on others cards) But the changes are real - exhibited 8MB give results relevant 8MB (not 16Mb)
-
trodas - Pentium 1 90Mhz @ 10.8MHz - 10.75 mhz CPU Frequency
RomanLV replied to ludek's topic in Result Discussions
Albeit no, you're the best in any case ) -
trodas - Pentium 1 90Mhz @ 10.8MHz - 10.75 mhz CPU Frequency
RomanLV replied to ludek's topic in Result Discussions
You replace quartz 32 to 12MHz, I understood correctly? How fast (_really_!!!) are the clock (watches)? I want a video with seconds windows near real watches If all is correct - you are the best! -
lanbonden - GeForce2 Gts @ 280/193MHz - 10645 marks Aquamark
RomanLV replied to RomanLV's topic in Result Discussions
And than you better all the others, who the results can not send? -
lanbonden - GeForce2 Gts @ 280/193MHz - 10645 marks Aquamark
RomanLV replied to RomanLV's topic in Result Discussions
No, I'm just am very glad honesty of the site. One - added category, the second - results. And I, like an idiot, embarrassed soldering ID. But nothing, all excellent guys. -
lanbonden - GeForce2 Gts @ 280/193MHz - 10645 marks Aquamark
RomanLV replied to RomanLV's topic in Result Discussions
Very honest site hwbot Very fair Want to be friends with the moderator hwbot order to he for me do cheats -
lanbonden - GeForce2 Gts @ 280/193MHz - 10645 marks Aquamark
RomanLV replied to RomanLV's topic in Result Discussions
You generally become arrogant?! It does not work for all!!! Then and for me add all results -
This is not always. I can show many examples with the establishment of a faster memory (and low clocks). When 166MHz and 5ns eg sorry, did not know about the existence of such a miracle
-
PSPS Therefore of the aboveI would divide the: Radeon SDR - 32 MB SDRAM, 160/160 MHz Radeon 7200 - 64 MB SDRAM, 155/155 MHz Radeon LE - 32 MB DDR, 148/148 MHz + disabled Hyper-Z Radeon DDR - 32/64 MB DDR - 166/166 MHz (some of them are AIW) Radeon DDR VIVO - 64 MB DDR - 183/183 MHz
-
Clocks - full nonsense IMHO. Importance has is the latency of memory installed and it is not always (and can not being verified). And revision GPU. And the type of memory Look at the abundance of graphics cards where on "normal" memory is better than "Ultra", Or maybe the contrary - what the manufacturer wanted to install. It's about the old AGP card, at least PS I have GF2 MX400 with clocks 166/142 128bit (and ram 7ns) - new category for this card?
-
You did not understand. I am angry not because does not added my card, but from the some, added quickly and without question (about the reality of the existence of the card) and almost ignore others eg show - what is this card nv40 64 bit? Photo this card? I am not found nothing similar in Google. Who added this card, and why? Did unclear logically that if there are differences of 16 and 32, then 16 and 8 they will be even more OK, but why is http://hwbot.org/hardware/videocard/all_in_wonder_radeon_ddr/ Remind how it added? Post number #55 in this topic Quickly and no questions SGR - yes GPU-Z is not showing. Unfortunately.
-
So I'm saying. On halvi has time (all added for 1-2 days). But for me more than a month do not have time to add 6800. AIW - ok, only 2 weeks ago . With different memory size I did not understand - my add or remove others. If there is a process global rework of database - you could write about it? Rather than ignore. And write including will remove a different size or to add? Though something to write and not to ignore. PS Exactly the same neglect everywhere. Somewhere one year ago complained VantaLT category (there are no results LT - all (ALL!!!) results is nonLT). Reaction moderators - zero). No time, yes ))) That's what I remember, there were repeatedly ignoring
-
Dobavili iz kuchi vozmozjnogo tol'ko samuyu kakashku - na ot'ebis' kak govoritsya.
-
Thank you for your quickly added nv40, AIW-s and and many others Thank you for what the for "others" is added same as for "their" Thank you for fair play! :banana:
-
Well... Really it is the same thing, But will it the right (by the current rules) to post the video with ID 6800 in the category "GS"? (would it not be blocked this result for discrepancy?) Yes, as I wrote above, many superfluous categories. But the rules have to be one for all. If merge - then all. If the separate - then all too. So while there is a division in the other categories, I insist that it must be in all. Otherwise - it turns unfairly. PS May be make it easier example: 6800 series nv40 DDR1 6800 series nv40 DDR2 6800 series nv40 DDR3 6800 series nv41 DDR1 ......... ................nv42..... ......................... ...............nv45... ets ? Anyway amount pipelines does not matter (it will unlocked, so 6800 @ 16/6 = 66800GT @ 16/6) Or 6800 series nv40 (8/4) DDR1 6800 series nv40 (8/4) DDR2 6800 series nv40 (8/4) DDR3 6800 series nv40 (12/5) DDR1 6800 series nv40 (12/5) DDR2 6800 series nv40 (12/5) DDR3 6800 series nv41 (8/4) DDR1 .................................... ..............nv41 (12/5) etc (If unlocked pirepines take as overclocking)
-
By the way, about 6800 - AGP 6800(nv40)+DDR3 absent too http://ixbtlabs.com/articles2/gffx/nv40-7.html
-
There are very many categories with different memory size. I, too, for the merge with different size. But if merge - then all the. If the separate - too everything. Now I see many categories separates. So why my videocard worse than others? For example - Riva TNT. Why is there a separation of 32 and 16, but there is no 8? Or make only one Riva TNT, or separate 32, 16 and 8. I so think PS And I do not understand - the division because different overclocking (I believe nonsense), because different performance on the same clocks (nearer the truth) ... or other reason? PPS And what about 6800 128bit? The same thing - theare are is 256bit and 64bit (what is this videocard generally?) but no 128bit (production is not noname - ASUS, to which I gave the link)