[Moose83 - Core i7 3770K @ 5740MHz - 61846 marks PCMark 2005]

Someday I'll have some good storage ..good one, Moose!

[ScunnyUK - Core 2 Q6600 (2.4Ghz) @ 4753.8MHz - 4753.8 mhz CPU Frequency]

I thought you had a 4800Mhz one the other day?On ep45?

[One more and I can rest in peace...]

Tall order getting past Cranberry and Tapatalk ::

[Moose83 - Core i7 Extreme 980X @ 5560MHz - 55489 marks PCMark 2005]

Tha Moose is loose! Oy..double Areca ::

[Schmuckley - Core 2 E6600 (2.4Ghz) @ 4720.9MHz - 21.04 sec PiFast]

problem with submitting..It's 21.45

[8 Pack - 4x Radeon HD 7970 @ 1325/1910MHz - 34125 marks 3DMark11 - Performance]

:: Wow..Vantage-style scores in 3Dm11 ..mind-blown!

[Something wrong]

If by "checking" you mean "beating" then yes!

[Something wrong]

eh..Just pointing out the hypocrisy.

[MrPaco - Sempron 130 @ 3760.3MHz - 14521 marks PCMark 2005]

One does not go from 900+ general HDD to 49 Virus scan..When other unlocked sub is 90 on

general HDD.

[Something wrong]

Oh! Look at what we have here! http://www.hwbot.org/submission/2309672_mr.scott_pcmark_2005_phenom_ii_x4_965_be_17571_marks No results.txt...no details tab, either.

Maybe you should police your own work,Mr. Scott.

[HWBOT Memebase]

I hate it when waiting for AMD's SuperPi 32M to finish

 

LoL

[HWBOT Memebase]

Good luck to find a pic of me

 

http://img257.imageshack.us/img257/3660/67901041.jpg

[Something wrong]

Glad to see your opinion of me hasn't changed. I don't care either way.

 

Soon I'll be able to sit at Massman's table, loved by thousands, hated by millions.

 

..and still be a douche

[Something wrong]

Well..I must apologize for thinking you were a total douche for 9 mos Mr.Paco.

Why haven't you re-subbed that score?

[Something wrong]

I did it.......logged on under Paco's name. Come at me again, so I can knock you down again bigmouth.

 

I do believe that qualifies for hardware sharing,no? You're using your hardware to produce his scores? hmmm..

[Something wrong]

I dont know what your personal issues are but I have not said or done a dam thing to you or about you.

So why the hell are you putting my name out there like that in a thread that has absolutely nothing to do with me

 

Oh..Oh..so you didn't report a legit score of mine just because you couldn't beat it? right.

Eventually you manned up and did,but not before I learned how you roll.

[Something wrong]

I don't really care what you think.

My subs aren't the one's in question. I know what the rules are.

You are a douche with bad scores..Both you and Mr. Paco are like jealous monkeys flinging poop everywhere.

If you can't beat it,you report it.I'm sure the moderation staff just loves you guys.

[New cpu-z code doesn't work with bot validations]

Fixed, from now on use the http://valid.canardpc.com/2637687 urls.

 

o YaY!

[glock19owner - 2x Core 2 E8500 (3.17Ghz) @ 4750MHz - 12383 marks PCMark 2005]

Hmm..one of them quad-core e8500s,a rarity indeed.

 

[just_nuke_em - Core i7 3770K @ 6341.6MHz - 3sec 625ms wPrime - 32m]

Nice one!

[Moose83 - Sempron 150 @ 5032MHz - 27024 marks PCMark 2005]

The Moose is loose! That's some high fsb!owait..14.5 multi.. I'm sure that Areca helps a tad

[New cpu-z code doesn't work with bot validations]

big fun doing that for every validation

Ah well..Thx for the explanation anyway

[Slaughter - Core 2 E8400 (3.0Ghz) @ 5625.4MHz - 5625.39 mhz CPU Frequency]

O! look @ the slaughterer werkin' da e8**

[New cpu-z code doesn't work with bot validations]

idk..it took it now

[New cpu-z code doesn't work with bot validations]

Ok..so CPU-Z changed the way their URL validations are,but no one has coded the bot stuff to accept the new format..It's saying"secret url required" What I do is validate..then copy the url to txt.Help!

It will not validate this: http://valid.canardpc.com/2637687