psdoria

@der8auer I did not wait somebody from Hwbot accept thats is wrong , even after HWBOT just has deleted my name from this Forum after my post . I'm trying to register, they tell me that send my password to my email and did not get anything, this shows me they are trying to avoid answering me, so I'm opening this new profile and showing the true face of this Forum .. Let me know... Do you really believe John Lam mistake himself? And you know what cases and what bans because you are from hwbot. You also know that is impossible a top 3 have confessed a mistake...but another 99,9% identical results is not stolen (sorry,...mistake). Come on, you can tell to all that the 99,9% have chance to be not stoled, but since John stoled (sorry,... mistake) one validation, why you really thing is that the "only one". I think is easier to John Lam to tell he mistake himself lots of times. And, what is the problem you don't know me? This happen because looks for a Mafia, where all you from hwbot tell incredibles fantasy to protect one and can use your own method.

The reason to be writing this letter is to be indignated by different measures used by HWBOT in order to protected John Lam, even though he has admittedly stolen results. In other same or similar,cases the punishments were banishment for a year, added the removal of all the points and now Massman says Hwbot gave "ONLY ONE MONTH" ban and no longer discussiont. Lets go to the facts. Were disclosed and reported by Slamms, several clearly identical results in different situations, when HWBOT was to investigate the veracity of them. Despite being nearly 100% sure of these results have been provided by MAD , there was a very very small chance that it was a coincidence (for me, an absurd coincidence, but HWBOT checked even the possibility of a Gigabyte board able to do the ram frequencies ... and was discovered a way it could protect John Lam). But hwbot did not protect a Spi32 result which admittedly was stolen (sorry, "mistaked"). Stolen indeed ... to say that story that has published the result of another, and even called all oveclockers this house of naive or fools, because nobody in their consciousness fill all fields and publish a fantastic result 'by mistake'. Once discovered that there was a mistake (theft results), why still HWBOT protects others identical results and obvious? Does HWBOT really believes he can be a result published by mistake??? Does any overclocker believes can publish a fantastic result by mistake??? Does any overclocker believed in coincidences of a person who posted a score fantastc by mistake??? and now the other identical results can not be proved. There's more. When a similar situation happened to others overclockers, there was 1 year punishment and a removal all hwboints. Assuming the ridiculous hypothesis have been a mistake (which we all know is not true), why others who did the same mistakenly posted had punishments more severe? It is clear that for some reason the HWBOT is protecting John Lam .. what did not happen with Andre Yang, members of Russia, Brazil, Mexico, LOC, eg. that were in similar situations and received punishments much more tight. Believe or want to make others believe that you can post a result of another is underestimate the intelligence of the people. Believe that a person who did this, with so many other identical results, held only once a swindle like that is underestimate the intelligence of the people. Believe that people deserve punishments and different alternatives for committing the same mistake, diminishes the credibility of HWBOT, which is the official organ of overclockers the world. @ Slamms - thumbs up for showing everyone the face of the true @ HWBOT- thumbs down for having showning yourselfes as partial and protective to some overclockers , it is a really bad attitude. > For those who wonder why I'm writing my first post on the first topic, simply say that for obvious reasons I do not want to appear as someone who wants to gossip, but to open the eyes of a great truth.