Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

Oskaliber

Members
  • Posts

    17
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Oskaliber

  1. I'm sorry, but this comment just doesn't make sense.

     

    - If we only think about low-end = BAD

    - If we only think about high-end = BAD

    - If we don't award high-competitive rankings = BAD

    - If we don't award low-competitive rankings = BAD

    - If we add variance = BAD

     

    Sometimes people complain just to complain ...

    I really like the idea of increasing amount of points in popular hardware, it was good move, but in my opinion decreasing amount of points in non-popular hardware is sensless. Bring back point system for low-end from rev.2 (2pts for 1st etc.) and keep the rest of update as it is and it gonna be really nice.

  2. It's still easy to get points now, but it's totally without the spirit of overclocking. Get any Q6600 and E8500 under SS/Dice and you can make 50 points each with very avarge scores. While someone benching every single socket 478/A processor and spending days at getting better results in benchmarks gets some just sensless decimals of points. And in the meantime you are making low budget contest, don't be hipocrisy.

  3. It has been designed for 1024x768. Which specific page is giving you problems?

    1. The site is to wide, so i need to roll it left-right which is quite annoying.

    2. Many things cover overclockers league a bit or other items in right sidebar. For example: hwbot january oc challage picture, table in 'benchmarks' and so on.

    3. Team names in 'members rankings' are cut, etc.

  4. You are trying to make older categories more popular by making HWBOT OC Challange and at the same time you discourage to bench older stuff by lowering amout of points a lot. Now it's better to make one avarge Q6600 score than to pwn s370 categories with all available CPUs. Making 75 as max is very good idea, it now makes sens to bench popular stuff without LN2, but I don't really like idea of lowering points in older categories so much, older should be left as it was in rev.2. And if not this, then as someone said "instead of it just being 0.1 points after a certain rank it should go 1.5 1.3 1.1 0.9 etc." at least.

  5. I spent last 2 days trying Discovery, TaiPan and MantaRaysXT. I didn't test them penetratingly, but mantaraysxt seems to be very nice one. Anyway I'm getting many strange problems with this platform. For example I can't push memory to 220mhz when at socket478 platform they were doing 240+.

  6. I decided to try some other bioses. Testing MantaRayXT at the moment, it's much better that the one I had before. I tried clockgen, and it autodetected PLL as you said, but when I click apply settings nothing happens and clocks are still default, do you have any idea why?

     

    EDIT:

    I just tried CPUFSB which is working quite fine.

  7. This one is the most popular and almost every page about this bios is linking to this one:

    http://home.comcast.net/~shrmytoon/NF7D_10b4.ace

     

    I got little help at xs forums, and some guy gave me this link:

    http://members.lycos.co.uk/hallampg/BIOS/

     

    There is tictac's d10, but it's "mantarays" and I'm not sure what is it and if it will work at NF7 rev2.0.

     

     

    EDIT:

    Also someone at xs uploaded this for me:

    http://www.benchbrothers.de/bilder/diverses/NF7D_10b4.ace

    http://www.benchbrothers.de/bilder/diverses/NF7D_10b4x2.rar

    but he says "They should be for NF7-S with nForce Ultra-400." so I'm still not sure if it will work.

  8. Does anyone know where can I find Tictac's d10beta4 bios and others for Abit NF7 series? I went through whole internet and every source I found has already expired. If anyone has this bios in the depths of his hard disk, please upload it to me somewhere, or if anyone can beat google then show me the link ;)

     

    And btw, if anyone know, what's the clockgen PLL for this board or where can I find any list since clockgen section at cpuid website is down?

×
×
  • Create New...