klopcha

I question this users AM3 results. I just ran a 7200GS 128MB card with a QX9650 at 4550mhz card at 620/900 the result was just over 35k with DDR3 58K is not possible.

http://www.hwbot.org/user.do?userId=12191

I agree. All results of the user are incorrect.

Example:

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=670450 Result on 7950GT, but category 7600GT.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=672090 The videocard is not specified.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=677698 The CPU is not specified.

All AM3 results very strange.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=640318 Unreal result, because extreme overclock X700 Pro (http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=630421) has 11109 marks.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=651255 Result on Celeron M 350, but category Celeron s478 350.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=606217 Result on Celeron M 350, but category Celeron s478 350.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=512329 Result on Celeron M 350, but category Celeron s478 350.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=606220 Result on Celeron M 350, but category Celeron s478 350.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=607257 Result on Celeron M 350, but category Celeron s478 350.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=632987 Result on Celeron 320, but category Celeron 2.4 Ghz.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=672320 Screenshot is wrong.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=574048 Result on Celeron 320, but category Celeron 2.4 Ghz.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=601228 Error in computation.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=667106 Result on Celeron 320, but category Celeron 2.4 Ghz.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=574053 Result on Celeron 320, but category Celeron 2.4 Ghz.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=666501 Result on Celeron 320, but category Celeron 2.4 Ghz.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=574813 CPU-Z is not shown.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=594889 Correct result 75 seconds , instead of 115 seconds.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=571520 Cheksum invalid.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=577373 Cheksum invalid.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=577372 Cheksum invalid.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=632688 Result on Celeron 320, but category Celeron 2.4 Ghz.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=574286 Result on Celeron 320 WPrime 1024Mb, but category Celeron 2.4 Ghz WPrime 32Mb.

Submission & member moderation · December 23, 2007

The user has FX5200 SE only now!

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=673245 Result on FX5200SE but category FX5200.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=677481 Result on FX5200SE but category FX5200.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=676393 Result on 8800GT but category Radeon 8500.

Submission & member moderation · December 20, 2007

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=677482 No resolution.

Submission & member moderation · December 18, 2007

The user registers identical results:

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=677498 and

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=673245 ;

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=677481 and

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=677482 .

The user has FX5200 SE only now.

Submission & member moderation · December 15, 2007

Massman: Do not forget about my last post!

Submission & member moderation · December 8, 2007

Should all be fixed

Big thank's.

If do not object I shall continue...

If results 2003 it is necessary to block and Aquamark have been blocked.

Please blocked http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=623885

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=610156 Result on 6800GS, but category 6800.

(copy http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=610110)

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=507506 Result on 6800GT, but category 6800.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=500893 Result on 6800GS, but category 6800.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=505284 Result on 6800GT, but category 6800.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=551931 The videocard is not specified

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=597018 Result on 6800GS, but category 6800.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=547482 Result on 6800GT, but category 6800.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=552510 Result on 6800GS, but category 6800.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=505532 Result on 6800AGP, but category 6800.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=506127 Result on 6800GT, but category 6800.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=506137 Result on 6800GT, but category 6800.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=545458 Result on 6800GS, but category 6800.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=487726 No link, no screenshot.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=610103 Result on 6800GS, but category 6800.

( and copy http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=610191 )

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=487727 No link, no screenshot.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=487728 No link, no screenshot.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=511282 No link, no screenshot.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=505932 Result on 6800AGP, but category 6800.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=549188 Result on 6800LE, but category 6800.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=551375 Result on 6800GT, but category 6800.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=505161 Result on 6800GT, but category 6800.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=511384 Result on 6800GS, but category 6800.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=397855 No link, no screenshot.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=487736 No link, no screenshot.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=487737 No link, no screenshot.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=504111 and

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=548316 No link, no screenshot. One user in different commands.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=545460 Result on 6800GS, but category 6800.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=610188

(and copy http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=610114 ) Result on 6800GS, but category 6800.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=547273 Result on 6800LE, but category 6800.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=504016 Result on 6800AGP, but category 6800.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=567667

and http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=572073 One user in different commands.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=610152 No link, no screenshot.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=610629 Result on 7900GS, but category 6800.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=610092 Result on 6800GS, but category 6800.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=551929 Result on 6800GS, but category 6800.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=527555 Result on 6800GS, but category 6800.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=550140 Result on 6800GT, but category 6800.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=503214 Result on 6800GS, but category 6800.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=567668 and

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=570346 One user in different commands.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=565933 No link, no screenshot.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=574087 No link, no screenshot.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=566881 No link, no screenshot.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=565895 No link, no screenshot.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=668508 The result without user, how can it be?

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=668552 The result without user, how can it be?

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=661112 Result on 6800GS, but category 6800AGP.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=656711 Result on 6800GS, but category 6800AGP.

And Adjustments not by default (max. Anis 1)

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=656695 Result on 6800GS, but category 6800AGP.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=644024 Result on 6800GT, but category 6800AGP.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=610702 Result on 6800GT, but category 6800AGP.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=668579 The result without user, how can it be?

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=646720 Result on 6800Ultra, but category 6800AGP.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=668503 The result without user, how can it be?

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=668561 The result without user, how can it be?

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=668563 The result without user, how can it be?

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=611777 Result on 6800GT, but category 6800AGP.

MOD ENTRY

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=653104 Result on 6800GS, but category 6800AGP.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=668483 The result without user, how can it be?

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=668450 The result without user, how can it be?

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=668463 The result without user, how can it be?

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=643871 Result on 6800GT, but category 6800AGP.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=649996 Result on 6800Ultra, but category 6800AGP.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=587751 Result on 6800LE, but category 6800AGP.

(Screenshot by Radeon X1300)

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=668454 The result without user, how can it be?

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=587742 Link by 7800, sreenshot by 7900.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=668437 The result without user, how can it be?

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=645318 Result on 6800Ultra, but category 6800AGP.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=643971 Result on 6800GT, but category 6800AGP.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=657614 Result on 6800Ultra, but category 6800AGP.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=668624 The result without user, how can it be?

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=653121 Result on 6800GS, but category 6800AGP.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=661365 Result on 6800GS, but category 6800AGP.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=668609 The result without user, how can it be?

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=668606 The result without user, how can it be?

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=668622 The result without user, how can it be?

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=587483 Link is invalid, sreenshot by configuration.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=652154 To look complaints above.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=656979 Result on 6800GS, but category 6800AGP.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=643862 To look complaints above.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=663449 Result on 6800GT, but category 6800AGP.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=625132 Result on 6800GT, but category 6800AGP.

All results with http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=668271 up http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=668708 without user.

Submission & member moderation · December 8, 2007

Please fix:

1.) Kindly I remind

Originally Posted by klopcha View Post

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=644052 ???

If results 2001 and 2003 it is necessary to block and Aquamark have been blocked.

2.) Malicious Cheater - Paulo Jorge ( Team: Techzonept) !!!!!!!!

GeForce FX5600 - 3D 2003 Mark

3542 marks - Paulo Jorge (Techzonept) - (GeForce FX 5600 @ 391/343mhz)

3458 marks - PJ (Techzonept) - (GeForce FX 5600 @ 390/335mhz )

3373 marks - PFJ (Techzonept) - (GeForce FX 5600 @ 391/343mhz)

3368 marks - AGP (Techzonept) - (GeForce FX 5600 @ 393/343mhz)

3232 marks - M_Guy (Techzonept) - (GeForce FX 5600 @ 390/335mhz)

In 3D Mark 2001, 2005 situation similar.

The identical CPU, MB, RAM.

I ask to take very strict measures.

3.) Please Fix

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=639182 No link, no screenshot.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=639186 No link, no screenshot.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=548479 Result on Ti4200 AGPx8, but category Ti 4200 64MB.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=574015 Result on Ti4200 AGPx8, but category Ti 4200 64MB.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=668541 Screenshot is not load.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=650493 No resolution.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=659161 Result on i855GM, but category i852GM.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=671054 No resolution.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=672148 Result on Geforce 8500GT, but category Radeon 8500.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=662777 Result on Geforce 8500GT, but category Radeon 8500.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=662777 Result on Geforce 8500GT, but category Radeon 8500.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=672612

(http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=672613 Copy of this result) Result on Geforce 8500GT, but category Radeon 8500.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=587903 No link, no screenshot.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=610155 Result in 6800GS, but category 6800.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=504700 Result in 6800GT, but category 6800.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=504745 Result in 6800GT, but category 6800.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=507569 Result in 6800GT, but category 6800.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=548308 Result in 6800GT, but category 6800.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=555800 Result in 6800Ultra, but category 6800.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=507556 Result in 6800GT, but category 6800.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=398141 No link, no screenshot.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=507220 Result in 6800GT, but category 6800.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=507031 Result in 6800GT, but category 6800.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=505120 Result in 6800GT, but category 6800.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=572135 The videocard is not specified.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=651721 Result on 6800 Ultra (PCI-E system), but category 6800 AGP.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=666708

and copies http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=668695 and http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=668640 Result in 6800GT, but category 6800AGP.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=656630 Result on 6800 Ultra, but category 6800AGP.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=668675 Result on 6800LE, but category 6800AGP.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=642026 The videocard is not specified.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=613557 The videocard is not specified.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=668705 Result in 6800GS, but category 6800AGP.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=668707 Result on 6800LE, but category 6800AGP.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=668673 Result on 6800LE, but category 6800AGP.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=573499 The videocard is not specified.

Submission & member moderation · December 5, 2007

Checked it

Why the rest have not checked up?

Submission & member moderation · November 27, 2007

I don't understand what your asking us for, can someone help you clarify?

Do not pay attention.

Please fix:

1.) Kindly I remind

Originally Posted by klopcha View Post

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=644052 ???

If results 2001 and 2003 it is necessary to block and Aquamark have been blocked.

2.) Malicious Cheater - Paulo Jorge ( Team: Techzonept) !!!!!!!!

GeForce FX5600 - 3D 2003 Mark

3542 marks - Paulo Jorge (Techzonept) - (GeForce FX 5600 @ 391/343mhz)

3458 marks - PJ (Techzonept) - (GeForce FX 5600 @ 390/335mhz )

3373 marks - PFJ (Techzonept) - (GeForce FX 5600 @ 391/343mhz)

3368 marks - AGP (Techzonept) - (GeForce FX 5600 @ 393/343mhz)

3232 marks - M_Guy (Techzonept) - (GeForce FX 5600 @ 390/335mhz)

In 3D Mark 2001, 2005 situation similar.

The identical CPU, MB, RAM.

I ask to take very strict measures.

Submission & member moderation · November 25, 2007

Quote:
Originally Posted by klopcha View Post

Kindly I remind

Originally Posted by klopcha View Post

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=644052 ???

If results 2001 and 2003 it is necessary to block and Aquamark have been blocked

Sorry for my bad english.

WHEN me will hear? HEAR?

Quote:

Originally Posted by klopcha View Post

Malicious Cheater - Paulo Jorge ( Team: Techzonept) !!!!!!!!

GeForce FX5600 - 3D 2003 Mark

3542 marks - Paulo Jorge (Techzonept) - (GeForce FX 5600 @ 391/343mhz)

3458 marks - PJ (Techzonept) - (GeForce FX 5600 @ 390/335mhz )

3373 marks - PFJ (Techzonept) - (GeForce FX 5600 @ 391/343mhz)

3368 marks - AGP (Techzonept) - (GeForce FX 5600 @ 393/343mhz)

3232 marks - M_Guy (Techzonept) - (GeForce FX 5600 @ 390/335mhz)

In 3D Mark 2001, 2005 situation similar.

The identical CPU, MB, RAM.

I ask to take very strict measures.

Where are Moderators ?

If have heard the Potapicus it is time to hear me also

Submission & member moderation · October 23, 2007

Kindly I remind
Originally Posted by klopcha View Post

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=644052 ???

If results 2001 and 2003 it is necessary to block and Aquamark have been blocked

Sorry for my bad english.

WHEN me will hear? HEAR?

Malicious Cheater - Paulo Jorge ( Team: Techzonept) !!!!!!!!

GeForce FX5600 - 3D 2003 Mark

3542 marks - Paulo Jorge (Techzonept) - (GeForce FX 5600 @ 391/343mhz)

3458 marks - PJ (Techzonept) - (GeForce FX 5600 @ 390/335mhz )

3373 marks - PFJ (Techzonept) - (GeForce FX 5600 @ 391/343mhz)

3368 marks - AGP (Techzonept) - (GeForce FX 5600 @ 393/343mhz)

3232 marks - M_Guy (Techzonept) - (GeForce FX 5600 @ 390/335mhz)

In 3D Mark 2001, 2005 situation similar.

The identical CPU, MB, RAM.

I ask to take very strict measures.

Where are Moderators ?

Submission & member moderation · October 17, 2007

Malicious Cheater - Paulo Jorge ( Team: Techzonept) !!!!!!!!

GeForce FX5600 - 3D 2003 Mark

3542 marks - Paulo Jorge (Techzonept) - (GeForce FX 5600 @ 391/343mhz)

3458 marks - PJ (Techzonept) - (GeForce FX 5600 @ 390/335mhz )

3373 marks - PFJ (Techzonept) - (GeForce FX 5600 @ 391/343mhz)

3368 marks - AGP (Techzonept) - (GeForce FX 5600 @ 393/343mhz)

3232 marks - M_Guy (Techzonept) - (GeForce FX 5600 @ 390/335mhz)

In 3D Mark 2005 situation similar.

The identical CPU, MB, RAM.

I ask to take very strict measures.

Submission & member moderation · October 8, 2007

Kindly I remind
Originally Posted by klopcha View Post

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=644052 ???

If results 2001 and 2003 it is necessary to block and Aquamark have been blocked

Sorry for my bad english.

WHEN me will hear?

Submission & member moderation · September 18, 2007

Kindly I remind

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=644052 ???

If results 2001 and 2003 it is necessary to block and Aquamark have been blocked

Sorry for my bad english.

Submission & member moderation · September 14, 2007

Fixed

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=644052 ???

Submission & member moderation · September 13, 2007

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=644053 needs more proof

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=644054 needs more proof

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=644052 Similary needs more proof

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=608945 needs more proof

Submission & member moderation · August 16, 2007

fixed

Thank's

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=632688 Result on 2min 20 sec, not 1min 40 sec

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=577375 Result invalid

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=632993 Result 1 hours 14 min, not 45 min

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=577428 Result invalid

Submission & member moderation · August 16, 2007

Did not wish to write, but report entry similar does not work.

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=559024 Error is computation and the type of the processor is not specified

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=611755 Result on Celeron 320, but category Celeron 2.4 Ghz

(and this old result http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=609269 )

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=609820 Similarly

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=609143 Similarly

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=609335 Similarly

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=609261 Similarly

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=609133 Similarly (No link, no screenshot)

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=571436 Deceit

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=581497 Result on Celeron 320, because FSB=177Mhz on screenshot and user have Celeron 320.

Sorry for my bad english.

Massman: You see my message?

Submission & member moderation · August 15, 2007

Did not wish to write, but report entry similar does not work.

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=559024 Error is computation and the type of the processor is not specified

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=611755 Result on Celeron 320, but category Celeron 2.4 Ghz

(and this old result http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=609269 )

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=609820 Similarly

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=609143 Similarly

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=609335 Similarly

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=609261 Similarly

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=609133 Similarly (No link, no screenshot)

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=571436 Deceit

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=581497 Result on Celeron 320, because FSB=177Mhz on screenshot and user have Celeron 320.

Sorry for my bad english.

Submission & member moderation · July 25, 2007

fixed

I don't see

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=622461 Result on S939, but category S754.

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=622456 Result on S939, but category S754.

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=622459 Result on S939, but category S754.

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=622457 Result on S939, but category S754.

Submission & member moderation · July 21, 2007

All fixed.

The reason why those first four were not changed is that those users already had better scores in the same category. When those were moved to the s939 category, these took their place as best s754.

But he is using 939 category HW in 754 cpu-section on bot.