[[BUGS] hwbot: Revision 3.5 up and running!]

There is a problem with the result (Do not display details):

http://hwbot.org/community/submission/943363_terraraptor_3dmark_2003_geforce2_mx200_161_marks

[HWBoints Adjustment #2: HwPoint Motivation]

Very good idea! I voted yes. But there is still work here.

[Videocard specifications requests : ATi Radeon X1600 64-bit DDR2]

Ticket ID: 646

 

Priority: Low

 

Please add ATi Radeon X1600 64-bit DDR2\r\nhttp://www.techpowerup.com/gpuz/n9by6/

[Who is RV530 and DDR2 64bit?]

Tell to me please in what category to place results. Desirable link

 

 

It will soon be created a separate category

My friend has the same graphics card

[Processor specifications requests : Xeon X5550]

Ticket ID: 449

 

Priority: Low

 

Please add http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=879504

[Processor specifications requests : CPU Xeon E5520]

Ticket ID: 415

 

Priority: Low

 

Please add.\r\nhttp://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=869676

[Buggy SEF !]

More bug

http://www.hwbot.org/browseHardwareVideoCards.do?gpuFamilyId=165

Category G31/G33 is not open ( Error 404)

 

http://www.hwbot.org/hardware/videocard/GMA%20i946GZ

http://www.hwbot.org/hardware/processor/Sempron%203100_%20(Athlon%20XP)

http://www.hwbot.org/hardware/processor/Sempron%203100_%20(A64)%20Palermo

Unable to "edit entry" and "edit modification log" for the results.

This leads to new window with "No hardware found, please be more specific."

 

thx

[3dmark results "insufficient verification" updated]

Approved.

 

ORB Link - this very good

[Videocard specifications requests : GF 7300LE 128MB DDR]

Ticket ID: 312

 

Priority: Low

 

Screenshot - http://www.techpowerup.com/gpuz/a2ppa/\r\n\r\nAnd rename category \"GeForce 7300 LE 128 mb\" in \"GeForce 7300 LE 128 mb DDR2\"

[Videocard specifications requests : Radeon HD4650 DDR3]

Ticket ID: 203

 

Priority: Low

 

Result: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=810317\r\nScreenshot: http://www.hwbot.org/signature.img?iid=182393&thumb=false\r\n\r\nAnd please rename category Radeon HD4650 in Radeon HD4650 DDR2

[Videocard specifications requests : Add GPU I945GME]

added

http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=GPU_1446&name=82945GME+Integrated+Graphics+%28Mobile%29+%280%29

 

Hey, Turrican!

You have forgotten our conversation?

GM945 = GMA 950 (Mobile)

 

Let's then rename GMA 950 (Mobile) in GMA 950 (GM945 Mobile)

[Wrong result]

Ohhhhh this one bench its wrong too, like mine ??

GMA X3100 in 3Dmark'06 not is GMAx3100 , is x3000 see the ORB

Moderated.

[Where are my results?]

Gents,

I didn't receive any points for the below seen submission? Can someone shed some light onto this? Thank you!

You have incorrectly written the score benchmark.

You write "305,718" , but need "305718".

I have corrected.

[3d03/3d05 problem with klopcha]

i know how it should be, as i stated in my previous post, but if you look at these scores with some common sense, you know they are correct

 

There are rules. If I make an exception, there will be a precedent. Rules will lose force.

[3d03/3d05 problem with klopcha]

Gothrek: Read please

Example verification screenshots http://hwbot.org/hwbot.post.do?postId=863

 

is there any solution for this problem? because i cannot redo some scores

The decision is possible if is ORB Link.

All in such conditions.

[Problem with moderator]

This is not normal anymore!

there where benches of 1 year ago, that stands good for a year.

I carry out the duties.

Results have been added after 12.05.08 and did not correspond to rules.

If there is a message of a forum with your results with date till 12.05.08 or ORB Link, results will unblocked.

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=772926

unblocked, FM link is valid

Here there is no my error:

21 Sep 2008 02:06 insufficient verification (crew) klopcha

21 Sep 2008 02:56 modified Chiller

21 Sep 2008 03:45 checked (crew) jmke

 

i already deleted them, but i will post them tomorrow again.

Why delete?

If they do not correspond to rules they will be blocked.

[Where are my results?]

Dan Jacques: I blocked some your results because they did not correspond to rules.

Read please:

http://www.hwbot.org/hwbot.post.do?postId=872

http://www.hwbot.org/hwbot.post.do?postId=863

[A bit of a confusion]

Corrected, but you could correct too.

 

Sorry for my bad English.

[result moved? no reason]

If you check both mine and your gpuz screens they are exactly the same. The only actual difference is driver version and sub vendor.

 

I have given you the reference to a site of the manufacturer.

At you G965 (desktop chipset) i.e. X3000. At me GMA 965 (Notebook chipset), i.e. X3100.

[result moved? no reason]

Dear BUSTAMOVE.

You have the Intel G965 Express Chipset motherboard with Intel® Graphics Media Accelerator X3000.

http://www.intel.com/cd/products/services/emea/eng/chipsets/299731.htm

 

We hardware spec base has mistakes, example, GMA965=GMA X3100.

Soon we shall correct them.

We are currently looking for someone who is willing to manage the hardware specifications.

 

Best regards.

[Wrong Result]

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=702100 Needs more proof

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=702229 From what time Radeon 8500 has a thermode?

 

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=702225 Needs more proof

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=702227 Needs more proof

[Wrong Result]

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=701697

The benchmark was not run using default settings

 

New rules are necessary, changing Z buffer is received chit.

[Deleted result.Why?]

Make a photo as this http://www.topmods.net/nord/2xe6850-team!!!+.jpg

And will not be problems.

[Wrong Result]

cant find resolution this is pro version!!!

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=659724

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=659872

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=636713 - No user

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=691679 Result on GF6600 PCI-E, but category GF6600 AGP.

[Wrong Result]

Well, the screen says ur bench wasn't run using default settings.

I agree.

 

And even with better vram ur gpu has lower clock.

You: ram@310 Me: ram@264 --> difference=46Mhz

In addition 3DMark01 is kind of cpu-limitated...

It do not agree. The Mark 2001 is dependent on videomemory (FX5200SE has 64-bit memory interface). The 03,05,06 Mark's is dependent on GPU Core.

 

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=627510

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=619487

Identical result,hardware,screenshot on 2 user

 

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=626738

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=626988

Almost same hardware, almost the same screenshots, but submited by 2 different users

 

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=626819 Screenshot is wrong (not informative screen)

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=625567 Screenshot is wrong

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=625535 Similary

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=638176 Similary

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=621976 Similary

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=621958 Similary

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=632600 Similary

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=626820 Similary

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=626821 Similary

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=626822 Similary

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=625383 Similary

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=625790 Similary

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=625587 Similary

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=622602 Similary

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=638562 Similary

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=622610 Similary

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=629658 Similary

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=629767 Similary

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=629708 Similary

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=629696 Similary

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=622606 Similary

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=629662 Similary

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=629769 Similary

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=629702 Similary

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=609549 Similary

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=666450 Similary

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=693592 Similary

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=593538 Similary

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=632237 Similary

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=567032 Similary

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=627512 Similary

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=626317'>http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=626317 Similary

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=626434 Similary

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=570903 Similary

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=570427 Similary

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=570909 Similary

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=628123 Similary

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=699169 Similary

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=693341'>http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=693341 Similary

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=698550 Similary

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=689918 Similary

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=688689 ...

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=685355 ..

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=688777 ..

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=685286 ...

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=693341 ...

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=645029 ...

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=649335 ...

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=692772 ..

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=689836 ...

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=666055'>http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=666055 ..

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=655866 ..

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=666055 Similary

 

 

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=570894 The name of a videocard is not displayed

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=643620 Similary

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=643025 Result on GF4 Ti4200 x8, but category Radeon 9500.

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=625854 Real result 16.5 seconds

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=680610 Real result 1695 Mhz

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=621462 No link, no screenshot

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=621463 No link, no screenshot

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=622688 No link, no screenshot

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=587758 Similary

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=593540 Similary

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=587757 Similary

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=587760 Similary

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=576003 Similary

 

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=638563 The resolution is not visible

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=643623 The resolution is not visible

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=674762 The resolution is not visible

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=570485 Invalid result

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=567030 Link dead

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=582752 Link dead

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=643056 Link dead

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=620141 Link dead

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=607784 Link dead

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=632183 Similary

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=626317 Similary

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=603195 Similary

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=587077 Similary

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=634079 Similary

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=615482 Similary

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=633620 Link fake

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=638951 Screenshot fake

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=641422 Use not Super Pi 1.5

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=641150 Use not Super Pi 1.5

 

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=695508

Screenshot is bad. To a window of the Aquamark screenshots CPU-Z, GPU-Z are pasted.

 

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=699563 Why the size of figures such big?