mAlkAv!An

It's just not regular and not fair according to other users. If i would have only an old 15" CRT for benching f.e. with no 1280x1024 support i have simply bad luck. Either the guy dont submit such results or he got to use an external monitor for this benchmark.

Cheat: wrong resolution(1280x800) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=700569 Second time he's trying this with same sys. First one has been deleted because of same reason...

Verification Links says Resolution = 1024x768 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=667249

Yeah, that's what i thought (said)

i think it's just some kind of 'introducing' or testing new categories...dunno same here: http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=699718 Edit: already removed

Please look those results: http://www.hwbot.org/searchResults.do?direction=&applicationId=0&teamId=0&userName=Svikens&gpu=&numberOfVideocards=0&cpu=Sempron+2800%2B+%28Athlon+XP%29+%28108%29&chipset=&model=&manufacturer=&minScore=&maxScore=&gpuId=0&cpuId=546&chipsetId=0&modelId=0&manufacturerId=0&offset=0&displayAdvanced=false&countryId=0&dateFrom=&dateUntil=&minGpuCoreFreq=&maxGpuCoreFreq=&minGpuMemFreq=&maxGpuMemFreq=&minCpuFreq=&maxCpuFreq=&system=&minTotalPoints= The guy seems to have an AMD Sempron for Socket A, but it's not the 2800+ with Thoroughbred core, which all other guys(like me) used to bench. His cpu has got a Thorton Core... Either it should be moved to another category(with Thorton core), needs a new category, or will be deleted. Not that fair to have both Cores in one category cuz there's a big difference in overcklockability.

the faker alias milkway(team55) is back as quatrop(team111) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=695540

Well, the screen says ur bench wasn't run using default settings. And even with better vram ur gpu has lower clock. You: ram@310 Me: ram@264 --> difference=46Mhz You: gpu@290 Me: gpu@338 --> difference=48Mhz In addition 3DMark01 is kind of cpu-limitated... So i wonder how u got that much points.

OMG, delete his account, this guy is joking all and everything... 888883dmarks (bad try with paint), team 55, 0.55sec in SPI....

What the Hell is this sh*t: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=695230

Benchmark wasnt run with default settings. Points are way to high for that clocks... http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=662830

right, but u also dont need Photoshop to 'cheat' another Resolution.

hey klopcha, actually it should look like this, if any settings(even resolution) are different to standard ones: same for 3DMark03

The new 3DMark05 'WR' is kinda typing mistake... http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=691102 will take some more years for us to reach 290693 points

Screens say results weren't obtained with Futuremark approved drivers. 3DMark05: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=687987 3DMark06: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688008 Espacially 3DMark06 result is way out of line compared to other scores in ATI 9700mobility category, while using much lower clocks. Please sort this.

@mache, if this is ur own entry why dont you just modify it by urself, or simply delete it and make a new entry in right category(2400mobility)? I would be happy bout this cuz my friend lost his 3rd place this way . Otherwise an admin will need to delete it.

There's a double entry on ATI 9700 in 3DMark03 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=685562 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=565023 those 2 results are the same(same screenshot, score, gpu/cpu clock) and were made by 2 members of the same team. Please fix this and/or delete the newer one(01-07-2008) of those entries. edit: guys did the same with 3DMark05 entry ]:-( http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=565024 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=685565 please fix