-
Posts
95 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by mAlkAv!An
-
-
Cheat: wrong resolution(1280x800)
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=700569
Second time he's trying this with same sys. First one has been deleted because of same reason...
-
-
I know Bwanasoft makes some "test scores" sometimes, to try out new rankings or something. Nothing to worry about:)
Yeah, that's what i thought (said)
-
i think it's just some kind of 'introducing' or testing new categories...dunno
same here: http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=699718
Edit: already removed
-
Please look those results:
The guy seems to have an AMD Sempron for Socket A, but it's not the 2800+ with Thoroughbred core, which all other guys(like me) used to bench. His cpu has got a Thorton Core...
Either it should be moved to another category(with Thorton core), needs a new category, or will be deleted.
Not that fair to have both Cores in one category cuz there's a big difference in overcklockability.
-
the faker alias milkway(team55) is back as quatrop(team111)
-
High for that clocks? Did you get that RAM is 310 not DDR? It's 620DDR - and that's the main reason. As for the default settings, I didn't change anything. I'll try to rebench it today and make an ORB registration.
Well, the screen says ur bench wasn't run using default settings. And even with better vram ur gpu has lower clock.
You: ram@310 Me: ram@264 --> difference=46Mhz
You: gpu@290 Me: gpu@338 --> difference=48Mhz
In addition 3DMark01 is kind of cpu-limitated... So i wonder how u got that much points.
-
OMG, delete his account, this guy is joking all and everything...
888883dmarks (bad try with paint), team 55, 0.55sec in SPI....
-
-
Benchmark wasnt run with default settings.
Points are way to high for that clocks...
-
You din't even need photoshop to cheat that away :roll:
right, but u also dont need Photoshop to 'cheat' another Resolution.
-
hey klopcha,
actually it should look like this, if any settings(even resolution) are different to standard ones:
same for 3DMark03
-
The new 3DMark05 'WR' is kinda typing mistake...
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=691102
will take some more years for us to reach 290693 points
-
Screens say results weren't obtained with Futuremark approved drivers.
3DMark05: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=687987
3DMark06: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688008
Espacially 3DMark06 result is way out of line compared to other scores in ATI 9700mobility category, while using much lower clocks.
Please sort this.
-
My HD2400 Mobility score is still not fixed...
Thanks !
@mache, if this is ur own entry why dont you just modify it by urself, or simply delete it and make a new entry in right category(2400mobility)?
I would be happy bout this cuz my friend lost his 3rd place this way .
Otherwise an admin will need to delete it.
-
There's a double entry on ATI 9700 in 3DMark03
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=685562
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=565023
those 2 results are the same(same screenshot, score, gpu/cpu clock) and were made by 2 members of the same team.
Please fix this and/or delete the newer one(01-07-2008) of those entries.
edit: guys did the same with 3DMark05 entry ]:-(
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=565024
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=685565
please fix
Wrong Result
in Submission & member moderation
Posted
It's just not regular and not fair according to other users.
If i would have only an old 15" CRT for benching f.e. with no 1280x1024 support i have simply bad luck.
Either the guy dont submit such results or he got to use an external monitor for this benchmark.