MaXtoRZP
-
Posts
43 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by MaXtoRZP
-
-
https://community.hwbot.org/topic/220312-the-official-hwbot-team-cup-2022-nvidia-gpu-thread/
-
That's wrong stage. Ddr2 ram only!
-
That's not Vega 8 picasso!
-
why 9900KF is allowed, but xeons are only 6 cores or less?? Does it honestly you think?
-
Does any rule regulating m/b tab presence on superpi screenshot??! Neither superpi nor stage rules aren't regulate it.
-
thuban cores are forbidden for this stage
-
8700k +x299? Ошибка, наверное
-
L4nc3
You must set dram frequency at 533 or 400 in the BIOS. Then you may increase Ht frequency. To my mind you ought to beat 3.4-3.5GHz.Your CPU clock by default is nearby technological limit (for air cooling), so it can't be clocked to great
-
Ticket ID: 31
Priority: Medium
Please add such cpu.\r\nValidation:\r\nhttp://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=379806
-
IMHO dura lex sed lex One rule for everyone
This result has been verificated at ORB. Or no matter for you??? Rule - is rule?
It seems that you wanna lose a lot of registered members of hwbot.
-
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=696079
Matched to wrong category. 12k/06 is toooooo high for 8600GT. Proof link is broken. Please block
-
Massman you overlook this
Wrong cpu category. Brisbane in Windsor category
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690088
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690172
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690432
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690392
I can't see any problems of that, because there is no such category as 4200 Brisbane - it's the first.
And the second: Bris core is slower than Windsor one on the same clocks.
-
My hardware is feed by Hiper HPU-4R580-MU ATX2.2, Sli Ready. As for my city I know about two guys using CoolerMasters RS-850 PSU's.
-
Once again
That's not a E2160, it's E6300:
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=607152
And here we can't see any CPU-z or other one CPUID, only result's log of SPI
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=609982
-
Hello, i think there is not 6200A result:
The TurboCache Technology is for PCI-E only as i know or i'm not right?
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=594133
Another one, can't see any screenies:
-
So, that's another one. I cannot believe that it's AGP 6200A (64Bit) results
I'm running now Mark06 on the 6200A and the HDR\SM3.0 tests are locked (unavialable)
-
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=602375
no reason to expect this result to be false, it is in line with the others, but yes resolution should be visible, but than again, it looks like he's using the free version, so you can only run at default settings;)
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=602374
no irregular result, slightly lower CPU clock than 3rd place, but higher VGA clocks, 3D03 loves GPU speed over raw CPU speed
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=602376
again, free version of 3D06 - only default settings possible, results are in line with the others at similar speeds, it puts him in 2nd instead of 3rd (your spot) because of higher CPU speed.
I can understand reporting/blocking scores because they are intentionally suspicious, wrong or cheated; but it is obviously not the case here; the fact that you are also running a 8600GTS and get scores slightly lower then him, and you stand to gain points by us blocking his scores has nothing to do with it, right? ;-)
No, but, it's my mistake. Excuse please. I'll be more seriouly observe the screens next time. Sorry again.
-
Does anybody see the resolution settings on these screenies?
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=602376
-
SF3D
Thanks a lot for your attention.
-
2 Maxi, SF3D
I'm not prefer to post fake results. I didn't thought about the resolution, but it was set as default. The results of 3D Marks are rather higher than others 1300Pro exact because of DDR3 onboard memory. You must understand that it's impossible to connect all of benching machines to the internet , so what's why that results have not a futuremark orb links. As for 630 i've corrected the screenie, so you may unblock it now (http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=593123)
-
-
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=597986
World record on tualatin 1.1 in SPi - 1.26 sec
-
yep, there is indeed a problem?
And btw, the cpu won't go higher even with more voltage?
As you know this chipset does not beats the records in FSB Rate. So i had found that if FSB higher than 332- the sytem is able to pass CPU benching tests, but not 3D tests. As for voltage - the system is rock-stable at fsb 330, Vcore 1.45 (set by BIOS)/1.41 (as PCProbe shows), FSB Termination +0.1, NB Voltage +0.1. Vmem 2.1V. Memories are full stable upto 355 @ 3-3-3-9-1T 2.1V
-
2 Massman, demiurg
I know that there are not cheats. But if anybody didn't paid an attention for that - they would be the best in SuperPi32m till now. I can't understand why so experienced members made such mistakes.
MaXtoRZP - GeForce GT 330 (GT215) @ 622/909MHz - 27979 marks 3DMark03
in Result Discussions
Posted