dread77

@ The Overclocker... If XS and especially HWBot were unnecessary in F1OC, why did you ask for their help? Or it was maybe the prestigious weight that these sites carry and your magazine doesn’t??? I can understand that. Massman posted something about missing price tags in BOT’s engine, is this the reason that you are saying that the engine is not ready yet? You are getting upset calling people idiots, though you are saying that this is some kind of your contribution to the overclocking community. Well all those idiots asking for a fair competition IS THE OVERCLOCKING COMMUNITY, so please have some respect. Or at least you should treat people as customers, after all this is our actual relationship, you are an editor and we are your customers. Or isn’t it….? I would understand your frustration if all this fuss would come from people left out, but it’s coming from all over the place. Even participants are complaining, even Kingpin posted in XS that HWBot’s involvement in F1OC is necessary. So if you want to contribute to the overclocking community stop calling names and listen to them….Please

http://www.hwbot.org/forum/showpost.php?p=25485&postcount=99 I don't think that there is going to be any explanations at all. We all got the point that there was something "fishy", so as jmke stated let's get that skeleton back to the cheating closet.

Did you ask them for this kind of proof???

No_Name, joe_cool and stummerwinter might have shared hw (that is MY oppinion and I might be wrong). That's OK with me because it takes more than hw to be a good bencher, and these guys are very good benchers. Thay can prove me wrong by giving FPO No's from their 8600's. The thing is that hwbot is accepting back known cheaters, who were accused and never proven otherwise. Also, there are cheaters that go public in XS bragging about cheating and no one cares. I am not going to say names, I think you all know them. These are more serious issues to be dealt with than who shares hw with whom.

You bet I did!!!

Thank you for your prompt reply. I guess I have to run them again.

Hi there, what is the problem with below results???? http://www.hwbot.org/listResults.do?userId=13285&applicationId=1 http://www.hwbot.org/listResults.do?userId=13285&applicationId=2 Bot marked them with "Insufficient Verification for Rankins", but it was uploaded as I always do, same procedure. Please, can someone explain me the problem??? Should I verify them through futuremark??? This is very frustrating!!!