harleybro
-
Posts
86 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by harleybro
-
-
Just figure I would throw in my two cents. I am sure I have tons of cpu-z screens oc'd that don't show voltage. It used to always happen when pushing the voltage too far. I think I saw it most in FX-57 days.
-
Was this done with MIPMAPS involved......
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=716510
CH = HIGH
NATURE = VERY HIGH....
Thanks.....
I would say definately no to mipmap. The CH is actually very low for 810 core. Nature is about on par.
Here's a run with cpu at 5200 and I forget 785-790core. Only tweaking was LOD and OS no mipmap used at all.
-
I would definately agree. If one person did buy that many I would definately guess they are a reseller and I am not sure MC is licensed to be a distributer for resellers. Hmmm interesting side note I just checked their site and product is no longer available.
-
I have never seen an 8500 available in the US. I know me and others have been looking for them.
On a side note it is interesting the local MicroCenter had approximately 20 8400's last Wednesday. I went in to buy one Friday and was told a customer came in and bought 19 of them the day before.
-
Looks like the HOT guys just had some major runs and took a big leap forward. I think it's time for OCX to get to the grind and keep on pushing it! Great battle everyone this has been a blast so far.
-
As I stated in the comments it should be considered single. The performance of this card and 3870's in crossfire is differant. If they where identical clock for clock then maybe it should be considered crossfire. Changing the rules this late in the game would be a slap in the face to anyone purchasing one of these due to the results they where getting.
-
I think both of these users results should be looked into for AM3. Unusual for two members of same team to have results for a 7200GS 64mb, 128, and a 256 and all only in AM3. Also both have at least one extremely skewed result. One over 58k and another over 62k on a 64mb card?
-
I question this users AM3 results. I just ran a 7200GS 128MB card with a QX9650 at 4550mhz card at 620/900 the result was just over 35k with DDR3 58K is not possible.
-
Ok how come this result can't be blocked?
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=574722
There is no data at all to say what cpu it is? I have had my T5500 result for Pi removed from my page which had been submitted becaue there was no cpu-z to go along with it.
-
One of our members:
Can you guys change it? It should be 03 and not 05.
-
Are links to FM still needed for top 20 results? I know there was discussion about ss but thought you still needed an fm link for top 20 global:
http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=648325
Obviously the wrong res on this one:
http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=648329
This one might be legit but no cpu/gpu info and no clock rates on either just a ss.
-
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=626714 the screen shows 9.593 not 9 seconds.
-
I hate to even post this but I am sure he has the right link. I was playing with the 06 calc and checking scores. The verification link here is for 18,4xx not 19k.
-
No that's not cheat
I was very impressed with that so high score when Black send to me the screenshots...After his first score was removed, he make it again with a 20~ difference between both.
This is the systems : http://www.hiboox.com/lang-fr/resultat.php?img=0l8rf2ni.jpg
It's look crappy I know...
I know also his score is very high but this appear to becom from a Cgraphic card "issues" I don't really know how are the memory timing on this GC... I don't know how high are the shader...
So all his actual score for that 8600GT Fatal1ty XFX are in SINGLE !! no SLI... Have you seen SLI system on the screenshot ?
Massman, I know how it's difficult to moderate all that scores and I really want to help you to understand this score ^^ Now he'll try again to get his system running and validate it on ORB
Bye (I won't have internet connection until tonight.)
You might want to check another score also.
Both similar CPU clocks:
http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=615741
GPU clocks extremely low for nearly the same score
http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=628924
Wrong res. on this one:
-
can you connect external screen? for 1280x1024? that would fix it:)
It worked fine for me and I already re-submitted.
-
Thanks Maxi! I just figured I would pop by and see if there has been any progress made?
-
-
I can give you a list of all the members who have been banned already, but that's not going to help, is it? Don't think because we don't ban in public that we don't ban at all. We just don't want to blow things up too much. Not every wrong entry is a cheat and we can only ban if we're 100% sure.
No of coarse that isn't going to help. I am sure you do ban and for good reasons and also in public isn't a good idea unless there is an uproar. Also I know not every wrong entry is a cheat. I for one posted an 06 score that seemed ridiculously high. Not until later that day or the following did I realize it was due to the 15" monitor and running the test at the wrong res. I immediately pulled the score so yeah accidents do happen.
jmke: Sorry if I came off sounding harsh. I don't mean disrespect to you or any of you guys that put hard work into the site. I have put many hours into benching the GTX I am working with to get up near the top. Starting on water with CPU on LN2 then going to vmodded on water adjusting shaders and playing around with various tweaks. Then brief testing with LN2 all while blowing through maybe 500L of LN2 and to see someone come along who appears to be obviously benching on a loaner rig while his friend is standing next to him telling him what works best well that's what gets me. For the guys on the team that work hard to get where we are and yet watch another team breeze up the ranks with what is very likely shared hardware can be a little disheartening. So once again sorry if my posts seem menacing I guess it's just the easiest way for me to pass along my frustration.
-
HWbot is not expected to be free of cheating but when rules are posted and a member brings something like this up it should be looked into. Maybe the way to resolve it is to make punishments more severe. A temporary account ban or permanent ban of a member caught cheating would be a good way to curb the desire to cheat. If nothing is done then it leads the members to believe that noone cares and they will continue to do so.
-
No FM link and is HOF top 20:
It's back again. Scanned by hwbot.
-
I know this was discussed and said it wasn't allowed. I tried to find where it was posted before. I have been looking through this teams scores http://www.hwbot.org/teamInfo.do?teamId=1546 and it appears there might be some sharing of HW. Today I came across results that almost definately point towards it. There are a few members on this team moving up ranks quickly with GTX and Ultra results.
Here's the 01 runs that seem just a little too odd. Identical mobo's identical cpu both LN2 runs and both submitted within 10 minutes of each other? The only thing that changes is the graphics card.
Scan date: 11-08-2007 01:19
http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=633206
Scan date: 11-08-2007 01:28
http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=633214
Now for 03:
Scan date: 11-08-2007 01:24
http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=633211
Scan date: 11-08-2007 01:30
http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=633216
Then just checking member by member you will find a few members with an X6800 result for say super pi but never use that for 3d benching? Just many similar results and hardware similarities IMHO.
-
Have you tried installing the monitor drivers?
I have a 15" lcd that does the same it will run 06 but it won't allow it to run at the needed res. I solved it by giving my GF the 15" and taking her 17" lol.
-
-
I don't like to block scores too fast. To rush things is never good.
I had a conversation about the subteam with Sergey13 and he convinced me this was only to SHOW how easy it was to gain points using such subteams.
He asked us to move the scores to Mayk's account.
I had a score blocked by you I believe on my account. It was my T5500 32m run which was done a few months ago and just blocked last week. I recieved the email and when I went to check it it was blocked already. The reason being I didn't have a cpu-z. Funny it would come to question since I do have #1 with that cpu in sisoft, wprime 1024, wprime 32, and #2 PiFast. Granted my 1M was slower but I guess it was hard to believe I could have scored in the top 3 don't remmber what place in 32m. As for too fast I guess the following day after an email is sent is the normal time for a result to be removed totally from an account.
I had just checked Mayk's account and there was dual scores for 8800GTX SLI in 03 and 06.
If it was to show how easy it was to gain points wouldn't someone let a mod or admin know about it here first?
3Dmark 2008 'Vantage' - to add or not to add
in Benchmark software
Posted
I haven't run a game on any rig in the past 2 years I also haven't had a network connection on any bench rig in the past 2 years. I voted to add of coarse. Now that I see I won't be able to submit scores since I can't save them it's useless. I was planning on a second GX2 just to run along with purchase Vista (just to bench) but I will not be adding a network in to run a bench. I use a laptop with a 3g card which is fine for all my network needs except running a bench aparently. :-( It's funny I have always supported Fm and bought pro versions of all bench programs but for $500 to submit they lose all respect IMHO.