Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

intraspeed

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    16

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Posts posted by intraspeed

    Result moderation

    in Submission & member moderation

    Posted

    15 hours ago, Leeghoofd said:

    Moderator Saltycroissant flagged it, I get these reports in and indeed it was missing a CPUZ memory tab, so I deleted it....

    Yes i perfectly understand what you wrote.

    But again , this doesnt make it right.

    When you say blocked it means blocked and not deleted at once.

    I dont know if this is somethings that happens to all as a standard procedure , if it is , it's wrong.

    You should give everyone a chance to check the result before it gets deleted.

    Now i will always have the doubt if the mistake was mine or yours.

     

    Normally i wouldnt argue with you on this , cause rules are rules , and i always accept rules.

    But not a deletion , like this.

     

    Why not allow a small deadline before the result delete ? 

    Because we are humans and humans make mistakes.

     

    Wanna take a look at your account and see how many out of rules results you have on-line ?

    Did you did it on purpose ? No i dont think so.

    It was a mistake.

    Did anyone come to delete at once your results ?

    No , nobody did !!!

     

    P.S.

    Yes ,i'm kind of mad with this situation , sorry.

     

     

    Result moderation

    in Submission & member moderation

    Posted

    Hi

    I got this in my mail.

    Quote

    Hello,

    An HWBOT moderator, "saltycroissant", has blocked one of your submitted scores. It has marked one of your submissions as 'insufficient verification'.

    This was the reason the user gave:

    need memory tab

     

    You can view your result here:
    http://hwbot.org/submission/5047662_intraspeed_7_zip_pentium_g4560_14186_mips

    If you have questions, drop a message at the forums.

    Yours sincerely,
    the hwbot.org team

    It says my result is blocked , but i dont have access to my result.

    The link doesnt show anything.

    How can i check my result then ?

     

     

    About forum usage by banned members

    in HWBOT Development: bugs, features and suggestions

    Posted

    Ok then.

    Lets all have a drink for the scammers.

    Hooray !!!

    Lets celebrate this glorious day ==> "Be a scammer , you can" !!!

    Cheat your benchmarks all the way , No problem.

    Be yourself , or be you double or triple account.

    You can always come back to the forum and play god or talk about honesty or ethics.

     

    Why ?

    Because you are a part of this community , and this community loves his cheaters.

    ?

     

     

     

     

    About forum usage by banned members

    in HWBOT Development: bugs, features and suggestions

    Posted

    20 hours ago, websmile said:

    It is neither a reward (what a senseless comment) nor a bug. It was a decision made by massman. Forums and hwbot.org are seperated for bans, this means if you get banned or suspended at the forums you can still submit at hwbot.org and if you get banned from hwbot.org you can still use the forums.

    When I asked to change at least the practice of giving access to hwbot.org  banned users to forums (means to block at least post rights or deny access to forums), this was denied. Reason given was that misconduct at forums does not disqualify valid benchmark entries, and that at second case, getting blocked for cheating at hwbot is enough penalty. I think at least the second part might well be discussed.

    Weird decision , i must say.

    Imagine this picture,which is real in fact.

    A banned member for cheating or whatever (without even an indication or mark in this forum appl) that he is banned , takes part in forum posts , giving credit to other member submissions or having an opinion about them.

    Go figure.

    This situation must be resolved.

     

     

     

    The official Novice Nimble #2 thread.

    in HWBOT Competitions

    Posted

    Leeghoofd is correct, as per general benchmark rules, the FM validation link is mandatory for all competition entries.

     

    And it wasn't specified again in the stage limitations.

     

    I will restore this score since the member cannot rebench.

     

     

    Thank you for your understanding.

    My score is on the link above.

     

    Needs verify from you ?

    The official Novice Nimble #2 thread.

    in HWBOT Competitions

    Posted

    Hello all

     

    A kind request please.

     

    I am new member and i did not understood the rule for this competition correctly.

    Because in my opinion is not clear written.

     

    Let me explain.

     

    1)On oc-sport page , there is not written about futuremark link

     

    2)On submission screen , there is not written about futuremark link

     

    3)On 3dmark11 rules , says "Mandatory for global top-20"

     

    Please make the rules more clear at first read.

    Make it easy for us new people.

     

    We dont all know good English.

     

    Please accept my score , cause i worked very hard for it.

    http://hwbot.org/submission/2854459_

     

    If i still had that 7970 , i would say anything here and make a new score.

    But i cant.

    I sold it , to by an Nvidia.

     

    I hope you understand.

    Thank you.

×
×
  • Create New...