Kolian

There are also missing Pentiums 600 with 133MHz-FSB: http://processorfinder.intel.com/details.aspx?sSpec=SL3XT http://processorfinder.intel.com/details.aspx?sSpec=SL3JP

Please, will someone finally add this videocard? For example, it is about 7 times slower in 3DMark06, than 128mb-version. Don't you understand, that there is no sense in posting such results into 128mb-categorie?

Looks like nobody understands what I'm talking about. Please, tell me, what is the difference between fcpga and s370? FCPGA is S370! These two categories are for the same CPU - Pentium 3 600 (6*100) s370! (the first categorie - s370, the second - fcpga): I'm not talking about slot1!

Ticket ID: 204 Priority: High \r\n

Ticket ID: 199 Priority: Medium There are two Pentium 3 600 Coppermines s370 in CPU specs, I don\'t see any difference between them:\r\nhttp://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_1009\r\nhttp://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_1700

Ticket ID: 196 Priority: High Please, add Ati Radeon X300SE 32Mb! It is much slower than X300SE 128Mb, especially in 3dm05 & 06. For example, here is 20th x300se 128Mb in 06 - 395 marks http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=686054 , and on 32Mb-version I\'ve got only 53 Marks!\r\nHere is a gpu-z screenshot with X300SE 32Mb specs:\r\n

Ticket ID: 173 Priority: Medium In CPU list there is only \"Athlon 750 (slot)\", while there are different versions of slotA-Athlons:\r\n- Pluto with 512 KB external cache running at 300 MHz\r\nhttp://www.cpu-world.com/CPUs/K7/AMD-Athlon%20750%20-%20AMD-K7750MTR52B%20A.html\r\nand\r\n- Thunderbird with Full-speed on-die 256 KB cache\r\nhttp://www.cpu-world.com/CPUs/K7/AMD-Athlon%20750%20-%20AMD-A0750MPR24B%20A.html

jmke But nothing is visible - there is no 3dmark settings, no videocard, no cpu...

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=588521 needs more proof

Ticket ID: 146 Priority: Medium http://www.cpu-collection.de/?tn=0&l0=co&l1=AMD&l2=486%20DX#A80486DX2-66\r\nhttp://www.cpu-collection.de/?tn=0&l0=co&l1=AMD&l2=5x86\r\nhttp://www.cpu-world.com/CPUs/80486/MANUF-AMD.html?gt_f1=2&gt_f2=%2FCPUs%2F80486%2FMANUF-AMD.html&process=Go&goto_type=0

Ticket ID: 144 Priority: Medium Please add:\r\n\r\nIDT WinChip C6 200\r\nhttp://www.cpu-world.com/CPUs/WinchipC6/index.html?gt_f1=22&gt_f2=%2FCPUs%2FWinchipC6%2Findex.html&process=Go&goto_type=0\r\nhttp://www.cpu-collection.de/?tn=0&l0=co&l1=IDT&l2=WinChip#WinChipC6-PSMF200GA\r\n\r\nIBM 6x86MX PR300\r\nhttp://www.cpu-world.com/CPUs/6x86/IBM-6x86MX-DVAPR300HF%20(66%20MHz%202.9V%20FCPGA).html\r\nhttp://www.cpu-collection.de/?tn=0&l0=co&l1=IBM&l2=6x86MX#6x86MXPR300,66MHzBus,black\r\n\r\nCyrix MII-300GP\r\nhttp://www.cpu-collection.de/?tn=0&l0=co&l1=Cyrix&l2=M%20II#MII-300GP,75MHzBus\r\n\r\nCyrix MII-333GP\r\nhttp://www.cpu-collection.de/?tn=0&l0=co&l1=Cyrix&l2=M%20II#MII-333GP,75MHzBus

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=637252 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=637254 Celeron 300A (Mendocino) submitted as Celeron 300 (Covington)

?

Thortons, submitted as Thoroughbreds, and some results with no proof: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=648978 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=641115 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=649000 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=640766 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=649026 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=573592 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=649193 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=649028 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688350 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=592683

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=591247 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=631560 That's the same result, submitted in two different categories

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=694336 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=693816 Same hardware, almost the same screenshots, but submited by 2 different users

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=652927 that lools like PiFast 4.3, not 4.1...

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=651088 "wPrime 32m - 21sec 0ms" but on the screenshot there is 21sec 875ms...

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=624332 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=667451 That's SLI, not single 7600GS DDR2

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=661644 - wrong resolution in 3DMark06

It's a bug or a cheat.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=654583 look at this result, (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=5554182), how can Radeon X550 get 466.5fps in 3DMark's 03 GT2 - Battle of Proxycon?

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=652887 - 10397 in 3DMark05 on a single GeForce 7600GS DDR2?? Compare this result with the second place result: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=615740