Kolian
-
Posts
72 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by Kolian
-
-
Please, will someone finally add this videocard?
For example, it is about 7 times slower in 3DMark06, than 128mb-version. Don't you understand, that there is no sense in posting such results into 128mb-categorie?
-
Looks like nobody understands what I'm talking about.
Please, tell me, what is the difference between fcpga and s370?
FCPGA is S370! These two categories are for the same CPU - Pentium 3 600 (6*100) s370! (the first categorie - s370, the second - fcpga):
Pentium 3 600Mhz s370 Coppermine 143 600 (802) 100 32/256 S370Pentium 3 600Mhz Coppermine 10 600 (675) 100 32/256 fcpgaI'm not talking about slot1!
-
Ticket ID: 204
Priority: High
\r\n
-
Ticket ID: 199
Priority: Medium
There are two Pentium 3 600 Coppermines s370 in CPU specs, I don\'t see any difference between them:\r\nhttp://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_1009\r\nhttp://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_1700
-
Ticket ID: 196
Priority: High
Please, add Ati Radeon X300SE 32Mb! It is much slower than X300SE 128Mb, especially in 3dm05 & 06. For example, here is 20th x300se 128Mb in 06 - 395 marks http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=686054 , and on 32Mb-version I\'ve got only 53 Marks!\r\nHere is a gpu-z screenshot with X300SE 32Mb specs:\r\n
-
Ticket ID: 173
Priority: Medium
In CPU list there is only \"Athlon 750 (slot)\", while there are different versions of slotA-Athlons:\r\n- Pluto with 512 KB external cache running at 300 MHz\r\nhttp://www.cpu-world.com/CPUs/K7/AMD-Athlon%20750%20-%20AMD-K7750MTR52B%20A.html\r\nand\r\n- Thunderbird with Full-speed on-die 256 KB cache\r\nhttp://www.cpu-world.com/CPUs/K7/AMD-Athlon%20750%20-%20AMD-A0750MPR24B%20A.html
-
jmke
But nothing is visible - there is no 3dmark settings, no videocard, no cpu...
-
-
-
Ticket ID: 144
Priority: Medium
Please add:\r\n\r\nIDT WinChip C6 200\r\nhttp://www.cpu-world.com/CPUs/WinchipC6/index.html?gt_f1=22>_f2=%2FCPUs%2FWinchipC6%2Findex.html&process=Go&goto_type=0\r\nhttp://www.cpu-collection.de/?tn=0&l0=co&l1=IDT&l2=WinChip#WinChipC6-PSMF200GA\r\n\r\nIBM 6x86MX PR300\r\nhttp://www.cpu-world.com/CPUs/6x86/IBM-6x86MX-DVAPR300HF%20(66%20MHz%202.9V%20FCPGA).html\r\nhttp://www.cpu-collection.de/?tn=0&l0=co&l1=IBM&l2=6x86MX#6x86MXPR300,66MHzBus,black\r\n\r\nCyrix MII-300GP\r\nhttp://www.cpu-collection.de/?tn=0&l0=co&l1=Cyrix&l2=M%20II#MII-300GP,75MHzBus\r\n\r\nCyrix MII-333GP\r\nhttp://www.cpu-collection.de/?tn=0&l0=co&l1=Cyrix&l2=M%20II#MII-333GP,75MHzBus
-
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=637252
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=637254
Celeron 300A (Mendocino) submitted as Celeron 300 (Covington)
-
Thortons, submitted as Thoroughbreds, and some results with no proof:
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=648978
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=641115
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=649000
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=640766
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=649026
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=573592
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=649193
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=649028
?
-
Thortons, submitted as Thoroughbreds, and some results with no proof:
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=648978
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=641115
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=649000
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=640766
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=649026
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=573592
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=649193
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=649028
-
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=591247
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=631560
That's the same result, submitted in two different categories
-
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=694336
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=693816
Same hardware, almost the same screenshots, but submited by 2 different users
-
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=652927
that lools like PiFast 4.3, not 4.1...
-
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=651088
"wPrime 32m - 21sec 0ms" but on the screenshot there is 21sec 875ms...
-
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=624332
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=667451
That's SLI, not single 7600GS DDR2
-
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=661644 - wrong resolution in 3DMark06
-
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=654583
look at this result, (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=5554182), how can Radeon X550 get 466.5fps in 3DMark's 03 GT2 - Battle of Proxycon?
It's a bug or a cheat.
-
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=654583
look at this result, (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=5554182), how can Radeon X550 get 466.5fps in 3DMark's 03 GT2 - Battle of Proxycon?
-
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=652887 - 10397 in 3DMark05 on a single GeForce 7600GS DDR2?? Compare this result with the second place result: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=615740
Processor specifications requests : Merge two Pentium 3 600 categories
in Support
Posted
There are also missing Pentiums 600 with 133MHz-FSB:
http://processorfinder.intel.com/details.aspx?sSpec=SL3XT
http://processorfinder.intel.com/details.aspx?sSpec=SL3JP