OverDozeD

Can any1 answer why is this 2'nd place? Seems,this is another site bug

What exactly are you typing? maybe it's new hardware and isn't added yet to database

Yes mylord! Promise not to give you any kind of work on my submissions next time ok, i'll do so Thread closed!

OMG No, sorry, OMhwmods OK, done Next time I'll do rock solid screens, even GODs cant block'em

One note, God never tries And proving that some1 is unmistakable is simply an nonsence just 4 fun

I don't like it there's no point to add it imho If any1 can vmod brosers plz share it

Weird, but I had no problem with 03 in vista64 home basic version http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=836059

@Massman Actually I didn't think of to mess with you:) I don't care about score, that was good lesson for me but the question was quite serious, not kiddin or smth like that. thx 4 reply

According the rules, If I use crossfireX dropdown isn't neccesary?

OK, whatever... go and keep working, you have a lot to do... I'm sorry guys if I made any kind of unfounded accusing, I really don't wanted do that. I just read new changes in rules and everything is clear now anyway my results deserves to be a valid IMHO.

I know what's reason of it demiurg is russian and just gets annoyed when georgan team makes any good result! Actually that's the reason for deleting.

Actually I run vista64 home basic version without ANY tweaks and answer on this validation please http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=803127 GeForce GTX 260 216 @ 756/1264mhz i7 920 @ 42000 mhz 2000 mhz CL7 I think that's quite normal settings for 32002 score @ 3Dmark 2005

What you can tell about this? http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=803127 It's unfair IMHO There's clearly shown 3Dmark score!

What did I wrong in these 2 submissions? http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=833773 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=833771 Why should I provide valid ORB link? If u cant see CLEAR 3DMark score it's ONLY your problem!

west I run it without any problems and compatibility mode vista32 SP1 i used directX web update but agree with Turrican, it's WAY slower than XP.

Few days ago was request for VGA -- GTS 250 with validation link by ANuB1S, but seems it's not added yet. When it will be added?

I repeat that... IT WAS NOT MISTAKE OF WESTSIDER IT WAS ORDINARY BUG OF GPUZ, EVERYTHING WAS MADE ACCORDING TO RULES!!! AND YOU SHOULD KEEP IN YOUR MIND THAT IT'S NORMAL THAT SOMETIMES GPUZ CANT SHOW NORMAL CLOCKS WHEN SYSTEM IS OCed I've got a lot such examples, and I just can't belive that you hear this first time jmke I didn't expected this from you - Famous hardware tester - "Making a mistake is human" << what about bugs of software?? Poor HWBOT moderators... they are left so few, and the worst part of overall, unfortunatelly... When your WR is deleted unfairly you also become agressive

I'm not moderator on this forum and I don't check others results here at all, It's not my job Agree with you about clean databases I've seen pics of hardware and screenshots westsider had used there, and there was only single 3870 GDDR4 OC-ed with crazy clocks and lot of fans, It's pity to loose WR result. If you were at westsider's place you would do the same as he. Ok no matter what's done

westsider Yes but somehow they also should understand you. OK no matter what happened, maybe It serves you right for future benches and hope that benchmarks developers improves bugs of the softwares we use here

It was dedicated 2 westsider not you, and I'm not goin 2 explain it's content here. I've told you everything I thought above And it's a shame on HWBOT are such kind of "discussions" p.s. I don't care much of It's consideration at all Only one question hardware master, the fact that you can't differ single GPU from a double one, It's considered too polite here?

demiurg NEXT TIME BE MORE CAREFUL WITH YOUR DECISSIONS MAN!!! And if you aren't experienced enough in overclocking better to ask someone who does! This is fair play not a polygon for WAR!!! ps. ზურა მიდი მიაწექი, ამათი უჯიშო...