gradus

No ln2, no tests) PS only test 231x9.5 4:3 22257 on SS, for you) 1.03.5. can post screen if need. so no normal score on 230fsb.

Imo only on TUSL-2 Vnb = 1.9v, imo pos better with ln2 on nb. no gain with 2v+.

http://web.archive.org/web/20011106002035/http://holicho.lib.net/bn_02.htm with foto. And he dont bench sl6by bcz available in 2002. Japan mans bench P4 after 1266 in 2001. http://www.cpu-world.com/sspec/SL/SL6BY.html The parts are available starting from Jul 22, 2002

Impsy find this mem) I have some Mtec, but not 103.

Holicho used LN2 on mem. 22257 219mhz/

I still dont post my new 200 10.5 result. "Difference between 2 2 2 7 9 and 2 2 2 5 7 is not 1-2s,but 4-5s." 1 second. on 2300-2500mhz mb 1.5-2s. I think you must study socket 370 better. Leave your results to yourself, I'm not interesed in them.

again, 230*9.5 4:3 bad setup. impsy sub 1m with it. only 245+ x9.5 pos norm, dunno. 230x10.5 4:3 impsy sub 1m too imo. in 2008 i test sl6by and 200 1:1 22279 faster then 228 4:3 22279. 1.05+ and 1.07+. no copywaza and bad win. difference 2s. diff between 22279 and 22257 is 1-2s. so i think for 10.5x: 200 1:1 22279 = 230 4:3 22257 normal result pos only with fsb 245+ and 57. for 1400 p3 its impsy hard, for 1266 p3 very pos. but i dunno about time. PS "but 172 2 2 2 5 7 is better then 230 3 3 3 7 9" - NO!

intresting, thx.

hi, what mem you use?

Tonicom PC166 @ 215 3-3-3 ln2 1m...hunix/hynday imo better PC 150 Kingmax @ 200 2-2-2 ln2 1m(dunno about 3-3-3, some 205-210)...not best too I make some posts about ram, when will i have more statistic.

i have Tonicom PC166 and PC 150 Kingmax...imo bad ram.

I think -60 on this mem fake.

you very serius man....very.... PS and i answer to you on XS. i wrote that i use another board for vcore! need scren of that? PSS and i very haha on this post) plz dont do another post like this) i very like that mans pushing s370 and we have some competition here. i dont benching 2-3years, and now im here only for s370. PSSS 1m and cpu-z GOGOGO

I ask him, no answer. Very bad man...dont want share info with other overclockers. Thats why i beat all him results on s370.

He bench on SS....smoke?) I test 200 bad modules only 192 22279 air.

i have kingmax pc150. all same results with it. 170+ 2-2-2-7-9 3.8v air 200 2-2-2-7-9 3.8v -70C "In my opinion sdram capable of 200 2 2 2 7 9 on air don't exis" how gigiracing bench on 210 22279 then? he told that 210 on air. I test 200+modules of sdram this month....

NO! i dont have that ram, but ez! at the moment only 213 2-3-3 -20C 1m and 215+ valid. ez 220+ on LN2. but this module very bunnyextractionty, pos find better. btw 230 3-3-3 so bad result..... PS "bunnyextractionty" lol....wtf correction?

RUGGERO what mem you use when 200 2-2-2-7-9?

1) 1.05.514 by gradus - shit old result on wrong win. 240/180, not 185. but i think 230+ 2-3-3 mem better for 1m.

200*10,5 1:1 2 2 2 7 9 = 100% sub1m

i have my 900 wr celeron, and i rebench it for you.

modding MB for normal vcore...

http://www.cpu-world.com/sspec/QK/QKE0.html dunno for 1m, 240-245.

in 2003 mans testing rdram@1333 on air, 642mhz valid seems so bad result....

AT-H chips?