Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

Doc.Brown

Members
  • Posts

    223
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Doc.Brown

  1. I keep it for the 1st run,change to basic,switch user/log on,change to architecture theme(for the last score I submited) and kill all the unescessary process before the entire pcmark run ;)

    For the moment I downloaded Lion TP,it seems on your screen you changed some visual parameters (window border,policies etc)...I think I'll do some test this weekend to try that and to increase the web page rendering

  2. THe problem is that you run an SSD without much tweaks, and you can get a very nice score removed because "oh, Xp startup is a tad too fast", which itself is silly. It might have been OK in ancient times, but today it's a joke. There's no OC related skill in crippling performance.

     

    +1 :ws:

     

    I disagree with the comments about tuning the 220MB cap wasting LN2. I "waste" LN2 getting my GPU up to speed, but it's just part of benching. Same with Copy-Waza.

     

    When you push up your GPU or do a copy-waza you've got a better score after,when you try to stay under the cap limit it's for nothing ;)

    The spirit is to push hw over the limit to reach the better score as we can,not to be the best slowclocker.

  3. Ok the cap has been here from the beggining but storage technology changed since this time,and if you just say"ok pcm05 is to old,not representative anything now so the only way is to remove it" I think you also should open a thread and poll(or simply do action to kill it) for the old,but one of Massman favorite's toy,3DM01 because old vga did equal or better score than newer vga(so finally what it is representative),like PCM05 it is very tweak sensitive and these tweaks aren't known by all OC'ers(i don't see any thread to reveal tweaks here)but oddly there's any controversy,and what think about the validation of the ultra bugged,binding Unigine(DX11 screen resolution,language,integrated audio activation etc) ...

     

    To be clear i don't want to create another controversy but just show off that the subject can be enlarge to other software and at the end we're staying with 3 benchmarks for playing,is it enough or it will be better to keep rules up to date with technology and so keep a large choice of toys to play and have fun.

    To stay under the cap limit I use ATTO during the start up test but I never obtain the same results one time it's good,one time not so that's why I think knopflerbruce idea's could be a good alternative.

×
×
  • Create New...