Jump to content

Featured Replies

  • Crew

the "banais" didn't have the 3-digit "numbering".

 

intel pentium m 1.7ghz -> banais

intel pentium 735 (1.7ghz)-> dothan

 

so, the error lies in the users which submitted into the wrong category or cpu-z in having problems identifying them correctly. ;)

  • Crew

Yes, and it's not the only one. I suppose it's a CPU-Z mistake that the model numbers of Dothan CPUs are not detected correctly and people posted them in the wrong place.

 

I'll figure what the error is, report on the submissions and write another letter to Franck Delattre, don't worry :)

 

Karl,

the "banais" didn't have the 3-digit "numbering".
This isn't totally true ;)

http://www.cpu-world.com/CPUs/Pentium_M/Intel-Ultra%20low%20voltage%20Pentium%20M%201.1%20GHz%20RJ80535UC0051M.html

http://www.cpu-world.com/CPUs/Pentium_M/Intel-Low%20voltage%20Pentium%20M%201.3%20GHz%20RJ80535LC0131M.html

http://www.cpu-world.com/CPUs/Pentium_M/Intel-Pentium%20M%201.5%20GHz%20RH80535GC0211M%20%28BXM80535GC1500E%29.html

 

The interesting fact is that earlier versions of CPU-Z showed Pentium M 735 correctly and the latter don't. And CPU-Z doesn't differ the usual Pentium M from LV and ULV and that is bad since there were model from both families working on the same frequency.

Edited by Antinomy

  • Crew

@anti

there are a lot of similare problems with cpu-z. after hours of digging in the database i recognized, that older cpu-z version identfied some cpus different than newer ones.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...