Jump to content

Featured Replies

Posted

sorry but your score isnt correct.

the 3:5 ratio is not acceptable.

also none of 2gb dddr2 chips can not set this frequency...

also your 4slots is full :))))

Yes all slots are full,that's what even made this OC better imo,i tried with a single stick,the board was not the factor nor was the full slots.This frequency is legit.And why is a 3:5 ratio unacceptable? My score is correct.Could have went higher had the sticks allowed for more latency,could only go from a 5 to a 7,as those were the only options the sticks had as far as Latency timing adjustments.

Well, as long, as the score is validated by CPU-Z and it is: http://valid.x86.fr/p3fztx

I did not see a problem. Certainly it is not divider. Anyone can use what divider he please...

 

BTW, WR in DDR2 frequency is 900MHz:

http://hwbot.org/hardware/memory/ddr2%20sdram/

http://hwbot.org/submission/1025909_shahryar_neo___baran_memory_clock_ddr2_sdram_900_mhz

...with 1:2 divider :)

 

Mine best use also 1:2 divider and no-one is saying that it cannot be used:

http://valid.canardpc.com/mnqznf

 

...tough I not aimed at maximum frequency yet... :)

3:5 divider on X38/P35/X48/P45 is broken, is 2:3 in reality on 400 strap

 

Oh, so on the X38/P35/X48 and P45 chipsets do this 3:5 divider cause false scores (too high)... Never knew that before, so that make the frequency invalid.

Heh, that is maybe where mohammad2284 learn that 3:5 is bugged on certain older chipsets and now he is just spreading the knowledge ;)

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...