Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

Vantage 9800GX2


Recommended Posts

Just wondering how these are approved. One submission in the top 5 9800GX2 that seems legit is by Mayk.


His QX9650 @ 4950mhz socres 20062 cpu points - That seems legit.


On the other hand, some others in the top five are lesser chips, clocked way lower and are scoring as much as 40000 cpu points.


Maybe I'm wrong, but I can't see how these are not using physx:


http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=777557 - Q6600 @ 4104mhz = 39,186 cpu points? Gold medal?



http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=777295 - Q6700 @ 3099mhz = 32,598 cpu points?



Not trying to be a bitch or a rat, but it's a waste of time for me to submit legit scores until this is sorted. I was guilty of this by mistake at first and mine was deleted. It's just not clear that you need to shut physx off, so I think it will continue to be a mess unless you stop allowing screen shots as proof.

Edited by MrCape
Link to comment
Share on other sites

These results need to be moderated a little better. I just got my GX2 and noticed tons of 100+ in the PhysX test. There's probably hundreds of people who've done it so far. :S Not talking about previous results, I"m talking about the ones that have been recently submittted. Maybe make a news topic about it to get the point across to the users. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Create New...