Blocked score, but maybe possible to re-activate it?

[knopflerbruce]

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=784107

 

- this score was removed as I didn't include the memory window... which is correct. The problem was that for some reason I couldn't open 2 CPUZ windows at the same time (the other one would never open, after the loading bar was gone nothing came up), and then I decided to only use that CPU window.

 

But I could make a validation, which is also on HWBot (at the exact same clocks as the scores):

 

http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=434658

 

The scores should match the memory speed pretty accurately, so if "common sense" is used, I'd say it should be unblocked. At least someone once said that there's no point in blocking obviously legit scores because of a missing tab or something.

 

PS: these two score have the same bug as well: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=784106

 

and http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=784108

[opendoor]

Cpu-z is a big id program, but sometimes make also me crazy

The memory tab sometimes report no values or erroneus one, and sometimes it crash when i try to open a second windows, like in your bench.

[demiurg]

In order to open two or more cpu-z windows do second double click on icon only after full loading first copy of CPU-Z.

[knopflerbruce]

In order to open two or more cpu-z windows do second double click on icon only after full loading first copy of CPU-Z.

 

Like I said, that didn't work at that time;)

 

I don't really see why there is a need to block the scores, they are all consistent with average memory clocks and the CPU type and speed in the screenshot. I also uploaded a CPUZ validation with the same clocks that should give you the missing memory timings/speed as well.

 

I'm not complaining against the rules here, but there have been a few posts from mods where you asked the users to not report all scores with missing resolution, tabs etc but only the scores which actually need all verification to be 100% believable.

 

I'm confused, do you want "us" to report every score that don't follow the rules or do you allow some kind of common sense here?

 

PS: I don't care much about these particular scores, it's the principles I'm after. I can rebench this chip anytime i want to.

[Dewa_OC]

i think you can use other program such as memset or everest cpuid

[knopflerbruce]

http://www.hwbot.org/result.history.do?resultId=762558

 

If you look at this result modification log you'll see a score with no memory tab has been "OK'ed" because it has a CPUZ validation as well. I've given a link to my CPUZ validation in the first post, so please spend a couple of seconds to unblock these two scores;)