Hi all,

 

I have been moderated some of my results, because of the lack of CPU-Z memory screen. This was done on small processors or graphic cards such as pentium 4 s478 or geforce 6200.

 

I understand that when a rule is applied, all the components have to be treated equally.

A rule is a rule and with Sarkozy in our country I know what I'm talking about...

 

Just wanted to say that I found unfair that my scores have been deleted when others can keep their Wprime results only by the validation number.

 

What means the validation number of Wprime? Does it refers to a rig? Where can I find the corresponding material used?

 

Also, it sounds unfair for me that "small giving-points results" are so strickly moderated as "high giving-points results". I know that no one but me has to be blamed for my deleted results, but I think that sometimes moderation has to be smoothed.

 

If I miss anything, please just tell me.

 

I agree that the wprime checksum/online validation is useless, as it doesn't give us ANY info whatsoever about the system - even the CPU could be wrongly matched!

 

But all scores are equally important. Why shouldn't they be? A wrong result is a wrong result, which is what matters - the hwboints are irrelevant here.

Does Wprime validation checksum have to be supplemented with a screenshot, like all the others benchmarks?

I think Top 20(global) only

I would enlarged it to the top 50 at least, if it is not enlarged to all Hwbot users.

Up, 'cause I think the topic of this thread is really important.