chew* Posted March 17, 2009 Share Posted March 17, 2009 I was under the impression that the big reg X and the Bold RED "NOT VALIDATED" was enough of a clue for a user to not submit it as a valid CPU-z verification...... http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=832845 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knopflerbruce Posted March 17, 2009 Share Posted March 17, 2009 Well, there are alot of comments about this issue on XS. Alot of peoble cant validate their Denebs, even at stock speed if my memory is correct. I don't really see why that red sign appears sometimes, either. If it's a corrupted file, then why allow it to be uploaded at all..? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chew* Posted March 17, 2009 Author Share Posted March 17, 2009 (edited) I'm not sure and i'm plagued by it as well, however its happens when under cold and when i'm barely stable enough to get a capture........... Rules are rules though " A VALID CPU-Z screenshot" I can't submit mine either I've preety much nailed it down to the rejections happening due to a variation in clocks........F7 4950mhz..........ends up being 4970 in validation...and rejected, downclocked to 4.0 and validated and it passed....... Example.....I can't submit this, looked preety stable to me though http://valid.canardpc.com:80/show_oc.php?id=527275 screenshot http://members.cox.net/bostonreefer4/7204core5.0.jpg Edited March 17, 2009 by chew* Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knopflerbruce Posted March 17, 2009 Share Posted March 17, 2009 I'm not sure and i'm plagued by it as well, however its happens when under cold and when i'm barely stable enough to get a capture........... Rules are rules though " A VALID CPU-Z screenshot" I can't submit mine either I've preety much nailed it down to the rejections happening due to a variation in clocks........F7 4950mhz..........ends up being 4970 in validation...and rejected, downclocked to 4.0 and validated and it passed....... Example.....I can't submit this, looked preety stable to me though http://valid.canardpc.com:80/show_oc.php?id=527275 screenshot http://members.cox.net/bostonreefer4/7204core5.0.jpg It's obviously a bug with CPUZ, so it should be considered valid despite CPUZ thinking it's faked or whatever;). WHat you CAN do, perhaps, is to make a cvf file on v1.49 and send it to Franck Delattre for him to upload it manually. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chew* Posted March 17, 2009 Author Share Posted March 17, 2009 Hmmm honestly not worth the trouble to me, will just wait for a fixed version, defeats the point of it being quick and easy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chew* Posted March 18, 2009 Author Share Posted March 18, 2009 So the score is still up? I guess this means I can fire away with all my Not validated results as well then? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.