Great score! but sorry man, you should use CPUZ 1.96 or newer

12 hours ago, M1RROR said:

CPUZ 1.96 or newer

rules say even 2.00+

21 hours ago, M1RROR said:

Great score! but sorry man, you should use CPUZ 1.96 or newer

“HWBOT recognises that on LGA1156 and older hardware newer CPUZ versions can lead to wrong multiplier detection and even BSODs while just opening CPUZ. Therefore scores are allowed on these Legacy platforms (release date 2010 and older) with older CPUZ versions.”😁😉

8 hours ago, TAXN said:

rules say even 2.00+

 “HWBOT recognises that on LGA1156 and older hardware newer CPUZ versions can lead to wrong multiplier detection and even BSODs while just opening CPUZ. Therefore scores are allowed on these Legacy platforms (release date 2010 and older) with older CPUZ versions.”😁😉 

17 hours ago, TAN YANG said:

Therefore scores are allowed on these Legacy platforms (release date 2010 and older) with older CPUZ versions.

Therefore scores are allowed on these Legacy platforms with CPUZ version1.59 or CPUZ version 1.77

https://hwbot.org/faq

 

but honestly just comply with the rules for spi32m specifically. those i am sure are updated regularly as needed.

https://hwbot.org/benchmarks/superpi_-_32m/rules/5272
im sure you can redo your score 😉

Nice one, hopefully this chip will see LN2 some day

16 minutes ago, TAXN said:

but honestly just comply with the rules for spi32m specifically. those i am sure are updated regularly as needed.

https://hwbot.org/benchmarks/superpi_-_32m/rules/5272
im sure you can redo your score 😉

1.59 or 1.77 are fine, 2.00 and up are known to be troublesome for legacy HW.

i mean luumi is using 2.00 and he's got the sweet top scores. but the others are allowed so its ok

5 hours ago, TAXN said:

but honestly just comply with the rules for spi32m specifically. those i am sure are updated regularly as needed.

https://hwbot.org/benchmarks/superpi_-_32m/rules/5272
im sure you can redo your score 😉

My basis is here: https://hwbot.org/generalRules - there's no restriction on CPU-Z versions👀. The original first-gen Core i7 logo looks better😚, don't you? Maybe I'll rebench it with LN2 this year. 🫠

23 minutes ago, TAN YANG said:

My basis is here: https://hwbot.org/generalRules - there's no restriction on CPU-Z versions👀. The original first-gen Core i7 logo looks better😚, don't you? Maybe I'll rebench it with LN2 this year. 🫠

It's very strange that we have two versions of the rules..."Spi32M rules" and "General rules"

1 hour ago, M1RROR said:

It's very strange that we have two versions of the rules..."Spi32M rules" and "General rules"

its not strange. just not clearly defined atm. "older cpuz versions" doesnt mean much. 2.14 is also older than the current one. 1.59 or 1.77 sounds very clear to me and i dont know why the admin didnt copy that from the FAQ page over to the general rules to avoid such loopholes

Edited April 29Apr 29 by TAXN