Ticket ID: 363

 

Priority: High

 

How about either cleaning up the lower level Athlon MP categories or dividing them into two categories for each speed processor. One for the \"Palomino\" core MPs, and another for each Athlon XP MPs (is there really are such processors at the 1000, 1200, and 1500+ speeds).\r\n\r\nPlease take a look at the 1000, 1200, and 1500+ categories for the Athlon MPs. Users are posting both Palominos and Thoroughbreds in the same categories. That hardly seems fair as the processors are not the same cores.\r\n\r\nHere are links to some examples:\r\n\r\nhttp://www.hwbot.org/hardware/processor/Athlon%20MP%201000 (Thoroughbred 1000)\r\n\r\nhttp://www.hwbot.org/signature.img?iid=114951&thumb=false (Thoroughbed 1200)\r\n\r\nhttp://www.hwbot.org/signature.img?iid=36403&thumb=false (Palomino 1200)\r\n\r\nhttp://www.hwbot.org/signature.img?iid=16709&thumb=false (Palomino 1200)\r\n\r\nhttp://www.hwbot.org/signature.img?iid=41482&thumb=false (Thoroughbred 1500+)\r\nThis one is not even an \"MP\". It\'s an \"XP\" - see the screenshot).\r\n\r\nhttp://www.hwbot.org/signature.img?iid=99321&thumb=false (Palomino 1500+)\r\n\r\n\r\nThose should be enough to give you an idea of what needs to be done to separate the processors into different classes for the Palomino MPs and Thoroughbred MPs.\r\n\r\nThanks. I\'m hoping you\'ll be able to see what I mean once you open those three processor classes. If not, post a reply and I\'ll try to explain it better.

i'm pretty sure those results are in the wrong categories.

 

plz look here under the athlon mp section. so low clocked athlon mp cpus with tbred core never existed.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_AMD_Athlon_XP_microprocessors

 

btw. your results are not viewable because of "hotlinking".

you should use that "link-format"

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=734941