knopflerbruce Posted July 17, 2009 Share Posted July 17, 2009 Ticket ID: 430 Priority: Low There are 2 categories of Opteron 248 in the Opteron .09-list, one called Opteron 248 and one called Opteron 248 .09. Only one is needed, I suggest you rename 248 to 248 .09, and delete the other one, which is empty \r\n\r\nAnother advice is to write 90nm/130nm instead of .09/.13, AFAIK most people use nm when they talk about this kind of stuff.\r\n\r\nThe 130nm category (or .13 if you wish) has some models where a 90nm part exists with the same model number. This can be a bit confusing, since the categories are labeled Opteron 242 etc (no process indentification), would be better if it was labeled Opteron 242 130nm and so on. (note that 240/840 only exist as 130nm parts ) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Turrican Posted September 4, 2009 Crew Share Posted September 4, 2009 ok, fixed Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.