1BadMoJoe Posted February 23, 2010 Share Posted February 23, 2010 (edited) A shadow hunter http://hwbot.org/community/submission/678513_shadow_hunter_cpu_z_k6_2_533mhz_533.5_mhz http://hwbot.org/community/submission/678528_shadow_hunter_superpi_k6_2_533mhz_6min_35sec_200ms http://hwbot.org/community/submission/678527_shadow_hunter_pifast_k6_2_533mhz_722.83_sec This is a k6-2+ 500MHz in a k6-II 533 class, User accidently placed a K6-II+500MHz in an uncorrect catagory please confer to the CPU-Z ID (exibt1)Model"D" and (exibit2)EXT.model"D", the (exibit3)Level2 cache (exibit4)Name states it is a K6-III+ CPU (exibit5) instuctions list it having MMX 3DNow!+, This "rare" CPU does not match a common K6-II 533 CPU-Z ID. I think it is a K6-II+ 500MHz Edited February 23, 2010 by 1BadMoJoe Link to Post and more information Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1BadMoJoe Posted February 23, 2010 Author Share Posted February 23, 2010 (edited) Mistaken CPU-ID I just cross referanced it...This is a K6-II+ 500Mhz Samples below show the same CPU-Z cpuID, sorry bout the confusion but it still in the incorrect class and should be reloctated-I have flaged the three score posts above to the submitter -or- someone else can phyicaly move them for him? http://hwbot.org/community/submission/922134_nom_yeslinux_cpu_z_k6_2_500mhz_632.99_mhz http://hwbot.org/community/submission/857873_kolian_cpu_z_k6_2_500mhz_577.51_mhz http://hwbot.org/community/submission/958954_nom_yeslinux_superpi_k6_2_500mhz_4min_49sec_125ms Edited February 23, 2010 by 1BadMoJoe More investigation into the matter and better information with samples with links Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Turrican Posted February 23, 2010 Crew Share Posted February 23, 2010 cpu-z recongnized it wrong. you have to look at the l2 cache. 128kb -> k6-2+ 256kb -> k6-3+ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1BadMoJoe Posted February 24, 2010 Author Share Posted February 24, 2010 (edited) Yes you are correct it does in fact have only 128kb on cache, we can agree that this CPU is a k6-2+ 500MHz? In second post there are cross referenced CPUIDs' of exact matches to the misplaced submitter in question (shadow hunter). If this is true, it is still misplaced in the k6-2 533MHz category and should be properly placed in the k6-2+ 500 subclass where it belongs? P.S. I edited my above posts earlier before your response. But the incorrect subject header I could not change, away from my earlier misdiagnosis as I gathered more correct information. I continued to look into the matter after my 1st post in which I discovered the correct CPUID in an attempt to supply the most correct relevant information around the time of the second post. Edited February 24, 2010 by 1BadMoJoe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.