Guest GoriLLakoS Posted May 15, 2007 Posted May 15, 2007 (edited) Hello guys, First post here, I would like to mention something that disturbs me a little, Some guys are posting scores from Athlon Xp1800 or even older setups like Pentium 2,3,Celeron 333,400 , making WR and gathering points. You will tell me that you will need to post 50 scores to gather 100 points but with 5 different CPUs it is quite easy. there is no point in Posting scores on hwbot on all the benchmarks and gathering 100 points with ease beacuse of this. Some other is benching really hard and some other just give a try to ancient hardware in order to have points. This is my personal thoughts of course and i am not representing someone else... Maybe it will be good to gahter points from A64 and up for amd and series 6XX or 5XX and up for Intel. All the other scores with older hw, can stay to the database for historicals reasons and only. What do you think about it? Kind Regads Bill ________ Gm Iron Duke Engine Specifications Edited April 2, 2011 by GoriLLakoS Quote
Guest GoriLLakoS Posted May 16, 2007 Posted May 16, 2007 (edited) Thanks for the answer jmke. Can you please tell me which #post to look? It is huge.. You mean that points from old stuff will not earn hwboints? ________ Porntube Edited April 2, 2011 by GoriLLakoS Quote
Sadhiq Posted May 17, 2007 Posted May 17, 2007 Don't forget that many people like to bench old HW For sure boints aren't as high for oldies than for the WR of 3D mark ! Quote
STEvil Posted June 2, 2007 Posted June 2, 2007 Would be better to make user score only the combination of their top scoring runs for each bench. They can have a personal score which is the sum of all their benchmarks for personal use.. but its meaningless beyond that really. Quote
Hak Foo Posted June 3, 2007 Posted June 3, 2007 Hello guys, First post here, I would like to mention something that disturbs me a little, Some guys are posting scores from Athlon Xp1800 or even older setups like Pentium 2,3,Celeron 333,400 , making WR and gathering points. You will tell me that you will need to post 50 scores to gather 100 points but with 5 different CPUs it is quite easy. Considering that many users are still daily driving such machines, it would be fairly discriminatory to penalise users on those machines. there is no point in Posting scores on hwbot on all the benchmarks and gathering 100 points with ease beacuse of this. There's a lot of effort in score-gathering that way. You can also get many more points per bench if you DO have a record in a competitive sector. Maybe it will be good to gahter points from A64 and up for amd and series 6XX or 5XX and up for Intel.All the other scores with older hw, can stay to the database for historicals reasons and only. What do you think about it? The boints are motivation for some participants to bench like mad and fill in a lot of useful data. For example, my main box is a 4600+ on Socket 939. It can't go much over stock on my current board, because I can't give it more voltage. Thanks to people fighting for hwboints, though, I can know exactly what to expect in terms of overclocking capacity and performance if I were to lay out the money for a board with more voltage options. Quote
demos_sav Posted June 16, 2007 Posted June 16, 2007 Gorillakos, we are not all rich enough to buy a qx6700 8800 ultra and LN2 cooling. So we wouldn't have a chance breaking a world record or even be in the top 100 to earn points. So what's the point of having thousands of members in HwBot with 0 as a score?? Quote
cdawall Posted July 13, 2007 Posted July 13, 2007 i think it is BS to do that leave the old hardware alone. I just upgraded from a Ti4200 a few weeks ago to do what your saying would kill off old legacy hardware like that. That thing is the 2nd place card for ti4200 64mb chips in AQ3. The scores for old parts is very low (only 1.7pts for a 2nd place score) leave the old parts alone a LOT of people still use them. I still have a celeron 433mhz on my desk and I STILL USE THAT! (for code testing it works fine) Quote
Potapicus Posted July 13, 2007 Posted July 13, 2007 So, as I understand, someone wants to give a boints only for tests with new,fresh hardware? It will destroy the idea of competition. I don't have spare 2000 $ for new 2x8800 ULTRA and one more 1000 $ for 4x core processor. On my work there is a lot of machines with pentium or celeron 800 MHz MAXIMUM - and people work on it. Try to delete all old results - and many members delete hwbot from their life. At this moment I have motherboard with integrated Cyrux GX Media 166 MHz - and I'll make this machine to be work. And I'll try to test it. So, it's the administration right what to do - stay old hardware or delete it. Quote
Massman Posted July 13, 2007 Posted July 13, 2007 So, as I understand, someone wants to give a boints only for tests with new,fresh hardware? It will destroy the idea of competition. I don't have spare 2000 $ for new 2x8800 ULTRA and one more 1000 $ for 4x core processor. On my work there is a lot of machines with pentium or celeron 800 MHz MAXIMUM - and people work on it. Try to delete all old results - and many members delete hwbot from their life. At this moment I have motherboard with integrated Cyrux GX Media 166 MHz - and I'll make this machine to be work. And I'll try to test it. So, it's the administration right what to do - stay old hardware or delete it. There is no such thing like deleting old hardware from the hwboints system, just limitations on the amount of points ONE user can get from the total amount of hardware points. Look at Hipro5: he hasn't benched older systems, but has also has hit the 300 hardware points barrier. Quote
Potapicus Posted July 14, 2007 Posted July 14, 2007 Let's look at him - he can use LN2 and quad cpu and fresh 8800 ultra. And it's the difference - who can use fresh HW - use it, and others use old HW. What is the idea of limitation? Limits in old HW or all HW - for example maximum results in cpuz - 10 - and there is no difference, in what category user earn it - or 10xOLD or 3xOLD+7xNEW - something like this? Quote
Massman Posted July 14, 2007 Posted July 14, 2007 Let's look at him - he can use LN2 and quad cpu and fresh 8800 ultra. And it's the difference - who can use fresh HW - use it, and others use old HW. What is the idea of limitation? Limits in old HW or all HW - for example maximum results in cpuz - 10 - and there is no difference, in what category user earn it - or 10xOLD or 3xOLD+7xNEW - something like this? Limits for all hardware, old and new. The limitation is only for the maximum amount of hardware points you can get for the member league. You can still submit as many results as you want, because the points above 300 (the limit for the hardware points) still count for the team league. Quote
Potapicus Posted July 14, 2007 Posted July 14, 2007 You can still submit as many results as you want, because the points above 300 (the limit for the hardware points) still count for the team league. So the maximum points for member=300? Quote
cdawall Posted July 14, 2007 Posted July 14, 2007 Hi cdawall, your Ti4200 score gets few points not because it's old hardware, but because you've got little competition in the Ti4200 league. The more people that submit Ti4200 scores, the more your second place will be worth. i already new that i was just pointing out it was old hardware that made points only against identical cards and tey are so old few have posted results with them, but if i oc the heck outta my newcastle 3000+ i should get more points than if i oc the the heck outta my Celeron D 351 since there are 20X as many 3000+. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.