Coldwove

So, particularly talking about this screenshot: CPUID wise, for skylake-X and cascadelake-X bits [6:3] don't matter as they are the same for the entire product block (0050), all that matters is what is displayed, particularly the cpuid stepping which goes as follows: 650: Skylake A0/A1 651: Skylake A2 652: Skylake B0 / L0 653: Skylake OEM mystery 654: Skylake Retail 655: Cascade Lake ES / QS 656: Cascade Lake ES / QS 657: Cascade Lake Retail Seeing as that screenie is a 651, either originally it was of a skylake A2 CPU or intel for some reason decided to spin a new die just for the 22 core cascade lake chip and on top of that give it a brand new CPUID with a different family ID which is super unlikely.

The screenshots that went around a few weeks ago of these are fake.

Please add threadripper 1920 NON X more info about it here: http://www.cpu-world.com/CPUs/Zen/AMD-Ryzen Threadripper 1920.html Edit: Forgot the valid: http://valid.x86.fr/yvg6vb

The E3000 (ES) appears in the database as one of the chips and it has a few scores, however "E3000" is not it's real name even though CPU-z says so, Per the part number it would have been E3900 (ES). So there's now two db entries for the same chip, so it'd be good to fuse them. Info on the chip: http://www.cpu-world.com/CPUs/Celeron_Dual-Core/Intel-Celeron E3900.html Cheers.

Please add: Celeron E3900. CPU info: http://www.cpu-world.com/CPUs/Celeron_Dual-Core/Intel-Celeron E3900.html CPU-z pic: https://imgur.com/a/ndUtd47

Thought i'd update this as I forgot for a while and finally got back to testing the Itanium server. Unfortunately CPU-z displays utter garbage so not much point adding it, this chip in question is a 9350.

Can probably compile and provide the info required if asked. Cheers.