Barton

These two times do not appear to be Hexus PiFast ver 4.1 times. Would you please investigate and remove if appropriate? The times appear to be well out of the expected range for Hexus PiFast ver 4.1 run on the AMD Turion 64 ML-34 processor. The times screenshots do not show that they were run on Hexus Pi Fast ver 4.1. Here are the links to the times in question: http://www.hwbot.org/community/submission/582045_klopcha_pifast_turion_64_ml_34_34.83_sec http://www.hwbot.org/community/submission/816060_barracuda___pifast_turion_64_ml_34_39.95_sec Compare those times, and the clock speeds and voltages they were run with to the clock speeds and voltages required by all other comparable AMD Socket 754 Turion 34 processors.

Thanks. Sorry about the wrong sub-forum section. I'll get some times up soon. :>) Oops. We need to get it listed at the bottom in this category. http://www.hwbot.org/browseHardwareProcessors.do?cpuSubFamilyId=1 I couldn't find it there with all the rest of them.

Would you please add a new class for the AMD Mobile Athlon A-4 1500 processor? Here's a link to the CPU World page describing it. http://www.cpu-world.com/CPUs/K7/AMD-Mobile%20Athlon%204%201500%2B%20-%20AHM1500ALQ3B.html I'll post times for it when the new class is added. Thanks.

Yes, it now looks like everyone who should have points is showing points now. That was not the case last night, but it appears to have self corrected.

Good reply. Thanks for explaining what was going on with all except for that one.

Looks like this is another page with many members posting times that should show points earned, but the points aren't showing: http://www.hwbot.org/listResults.do?cpuModelId=550&applicationId=3&filterUser=true&filterBlocked=true&limit=100 What's up with that? See # 5, 10, 20 for example.

Just curious why no points were awarded for this entry even though it was included in the top five Super Pi 1M times for the AMD Sempron 64 2600+ Palermo? http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=549812 Are some entries allowed in the lists, but no eligible for points? Is this one of those?

That doesn't seem to be the present rule. It appears to me that all old points follow the member to whichever and whatever new teams he/she may join. Then again, perhaps not?

Ticket ID: 711 Priority: High Hi mods,\r\n\r\nWould you add a class for the AMD Mobile Sempron 64 3100 Albany core?\r\n\r\nHere\'s the CPUWorld link to it:\r\n\r\nhttp://www.cpu-world.com/CPUs/K8/AMD-Mobile%20Sempron%203100%2B%20-%20SMN3100BKX3BX.html\r\n\r\nHere\'s a CPUZ validation link:\r\n\r\nhttp://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=847543\r\n\r\nThanks.

Ticket ID: 703 Priority: High The previous request to add a new processor was in the video card section. Here it is again, with additional and corrected information.\r\n\r\nWould you please add a new processor class for the AMD Mobile K8 Athlon XP-M 3000+ (Dublin core) processor?\r\n\r\nI have one of those and would like to bench it for HWBot:\r\n\r\nHere\'s the CPUZ screenshot link:\r\n\r\nhttp://www.postimage.org/image.php?v=Pq1eRq4S\r\n\r\nHere are the CPUWorld and ChipList links:\r\n\r\nhttp://www.cpu-world.com/CPUs/K8/AMD-Mobile%20K8%20Athlon%20XP-M%203000%2B%20-%20AHN3000BIX3AX.html\r\n\r\nhttp://www.chiplist.com/AMD_Athlon_XP_M_processor_Dublin_revision_CG/tree3f-subsection--2096-/\r\n\r\nThe OPN, stepping and date codes on my processor are:\r\n\r\nAHN3000BIX3AX CBAEC 0441 WPMW \r\n\r\nThis is a Socket 754 processor. Let me know if you need anything else or if you want the CPUZ screenshot validated. I can do that if needed.\r\n\r\nThanks.\r\n11-22-2009

Ticket ID: 701 Priority: High Would you please create a new class for the AMD Moblie Athlon 64 3000+ Dublin core CPU?\r\n\r\nHere\'s the CPUWorld.com web page that describes it:\r\n\r\nhttp://www.cpu-world.com/CPUs/K8/AMD-Mobile%20K8%20Athlon%20XP-M%203000%2B%20-%20AHN3000BIX3AX.html\r\n\r\nI\'ve got one of those chips and would like to bench it for HWBot.\r\n\r\nThanks. 11-21-2009

Ticket ID: 689 Priority: High Hi Turrican.\r\n\r\nThanks for creating all the new Mobile Sempron 64 classes. It looks like one was omitted. That\'s the Mobile Sempron 64 2800+ Ablany core. That the first one I have that I\'d like to post up. \r\n\r\nWould you create that additional new class as soon as you have time? \r\n\r\nHere\'s are links to my CPUZ benchmark with that chip if you need to see it.\r\n\r\nhttp://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=832469\r\n\r\nhttp://www.postimage.org/image.php?v=Pq11p8oJ\r\n\r\nhttp://www.postimage.org/image.php?v=Pq11p8oJ&code=2\r\n\r\nThis processor is also shown on chiplist. CPUWorld doesn\'t have it in their list, but it is a valid, legit AMD Socket 754 cpu. I\'d like us to have it in our database here at HWBOT.\r\n\r\nThanks again for your help. You put a lot into the new categories yesterday. I appreciate it. ;>)

Ticket ID: 686 Priority: High Would you please create a new class for the AMD Mobile Sempron 64 2800+ Albany core?\r\n\r\nI have one and would like to bench it for HWBot.\r\n\r\nHere\'s the Chiplist web page that describes the AMD Sempron Mobiles processor.\r\n\r\nhttp://www.chiplist.com/AMD_Mobile_Sempron_processor/tree3f-section--2075-/\r\n\r\nWhile you are creating the new class for the Mobile Sempron 64 - Albany core, would you also create new classes for the Roma, Georgetown, and Dublin core Mobile Sempron 64 processors?\r\n\r\nFinally, the present AMD Mobile Sempron 64 class should be renamed the AMD Mobile Sempron 64 - Sonora class as that appears to be what is now posted in that class.\r\n\r\nHere\'s the link to the present class for the AMD Mobile Sempron 64 to be renamed:\r\n\r\nhttp://www.hwbot.org/hardware/processor/mobile_sempron_2800\r\n\r\nNote that in making these new classes for the various different classes of the AMD Mobile Sempron 64 2800+ we will be treating it in the same way that the Mobile Sempron 64 3000+ is now treated with several different classes to represnent each core of that model CPU.\r\n\r\nSee this HWBot web page to see what I\'m talking about if there are any questions:\r\n\r\nhttp://www.hwbot.org/browseHardwareProcessors.do?cpuSubFamilyId=7\r\n\r\nThanks for your help on this. I\'ve some I\'d like to bench and post up in the new classes.

Ticket ID: 683 Priority: High Would you please create a new class for the AMD Mobile Sempron 64 2800+ Albany core?\r\n\r\nI have one and would like to bench it for HWBot.\r\n\r\nHere\'s the Chiplist web page that describes the AMD Sempron Mobiles processor.\r\n\r\nhttp://www.chiplist.com/AMD_Mobile_Sempron_processor/tree3f-section--2075-/\r\n\r\nWhile you are creating the new class for the Mobile Sempron 64 - Albany core, would you also create new classes for the Roma, Georgetown, and Dublin core Mobile Sempron 64 processors?\r\n\r\nFinally, the present AMD Mobile Sempron 64 class should be renamed the AMD Mobile Sempron 64 - Sonora class as that appears to be what is now posted in that class.\r\n\r\nHere\'s the link to the present class for the AMD Mobile Sempron 64 to be renamed:\r\n\r\nhttp://www.hwbot.org/hardware/processor/mobile_sempron_2800\r\n\r\nNote that in making these new classes for the various different classes of the AMD Mobile Sempron 64 2800+ we will be treating it in the same way that the Mobile Sempron 64 3000+ is now treated with several different classes to represnent each core of that model CPU. \r\n\r\nSee this HWBot web page to see what I\'m talking about if there are any questions:\r\n\r\nhttp://www.hwbot.org/browseHardwareProcessors.do?cpuSubFamilyId=7\r\n\r\nThanks for your help on this. I\'ve some I\'d like to bench and post up in the new classes.

Ticket ID: 641 Priority: High It looks like we need a new category for the Althon MP 2100+ Palomino core processors.\r\n\r\nThe two members currently posting times in the present Athlon MP 2100+ category did so with 2100+ MP Thoroughbred cores. The present Athlon MP 2100+ class should be designated for the 2100+ MPs with Thoroughbred cores.\r\n\r\nhttp://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/athlon_mp_2100\r\n\r\nHere\'s a link to the CPUWorld.com webpage that shows the 2100+ MP also came in the Palomino core:\r\n\r\nhttp://www.cpu-world.com/CPUs/K7/AMD...2100DMS3C.html\r\n\r\nHere\'s a CPUZ screenie showing one with the Palomino core:\r\n\r\nhttp://www.postimage.org/image.php?v=Pq1b6i8A\r\n..\r\n\r\n(Note that stock speed is 133x13. This one is overclocked at 160x12.)

Thank you. It helps to have a firm guideline on when to update to a newer version. What you've said gives us just that. I'll go with 1.52.1 so long as it uploads at CPUZ.

Are new results posted with CPUZ version 1.52.1 still valid? Does the requirement that results be posted using the newest version of CPUZ apply only to the "major" revisions such as going from 1.51 to 1.52? Or does the "most current version rule" also apply to the minor revisions such as going from 1.52.1 to 1.52.2?

Would you please check missing entries in the Athlon XP-M 2400+ Thoroughbred class? http://www.hwbot.org/hardware/processor/athlon_xp_m_2400_thoroughbred'>http://www.hwbot.org/hardware/processor/athlon_xp_m_2400_thoroughbred I submitted entries for: CPUZ PCMark 2005 Pi Fast Super Pi 1M Super Pi 32M WPrime 32M But none of those are showing up on the Athlon XP-M 2400+ Thoroughbred page. http://www.hwbot.org/hardware/processor/athlon_xp_m_2400_thoroughbred Funny thing is that at least some of them are showing up on my total point count page...??? Thanks. 10-04-2009

Ticket ID: 602 Priority: High Would you please add a new class for the Athlon XP 1600+ (Thoroughbred)?\r\n\r\nI have a 1600+ Tbred and would like to post up it\'s times. It would not seem fair to include it in with the Palominos in the present Athlon XP 1600+ class.\r\n\r\nThe present Athlon XP 1600+ class needs to be renamed to read:\r\n\r\n\"Athlon XP 1600+ (Palomino)\"\r\n\r\nHere\'s a link to the wikipedia web page showing that AMD made the 1600+ in both the Palomino and Thoroughbred cores.\r\n\r\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_AMD_Athlon_XP_microprocessors#fn_1\r\n\r\nThanks,\r\nBarton\r\n10-01-2009

It appears the two "mobile Athlon XP 1500 and 1800" classes should be combined with the XP-M classes. example: http://www.hwbot.org/hardware/processor/mobile_athlon_xp_1500 Look down to the bottom of the Athlon XP list to find the two "Mobile Athlon XP" classes. http://www.hwbot.org/browseHardwareProcessors.do?cpuSubFamilyId=4

Here's the link to the item involved. It's for the CPUZ times for the AMD Socket A Sempron 3000+. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=893534 Let me know if you need the link to my private profile. Note that the other user involved may also need the item "cleared" from his profile as well. That's the number 2 CPUZ place - Stone_age. Here's the link to his time: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=813634

Would one of the mods please clear the "1 item needs attention" from my private profile? The item was addressed last week, but it has not yet been removed. Thanks.

Trophy and points awarded for Sempron 3000+ CPUZ times have been addressed by knopplebruce. http://www.hwbot.org/hardware/processor/sempron_3000_athlon_xp Would you remove the "issues" notices from my personal profile page? And also from the personal profile page for the other party whose number 2 score was temporarily shown in third place rather than second?

nm

Would someone double check the following CPUZ score of 2443 Mhz in the 2200+ XP-M Tbred class against the image shown in the submission? http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=593521 As near as I can tell, it appears the verification screenshot shows 2223 Mhz, not 2443 Mhz. Attempted to report this through normal channels, but the "Oh Crap" error appeared saying it must be a coding error and cannot be reported that way.