Bartmasta

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=939092&tab=info theres no checksum or screenshot showing the score and I think the score is a bit off so it's invalid

the 2 suggestions about the point algorythm

when are the suggestions getting implemented btw

guys I've noticed the your points have changed thing in your profile is gone now. Why did it get removed? i wanna see how I got more points.

temps?

thats what i meant

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=590727 look at the score then look at the screenshot

can i take a pic of my rig instead because it has a nice case

ok thanks, how long do you think till this gets fixed?

so can I get this fixed or do I have to bench again?

unfortunately I can't find the .wps file I used

hey I have a bug my wprime 32m submission isnt getting any points because it says it's not my best submission for the cpu but that's not true http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=906592&tab=info same for http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=906591

hey I have a bug my wprime 32m submission isnt getting any points because it says it's not my best submission for the cpu but that's not true http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=906592&tab=info same for http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=906591

checksum is enough

hey I have a bug my wprime 32m submission isnt getting any points because it says it's not my best submission for the cpu but that's not true http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=906592&tab=info same for http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=906591

oh I didn't know you can submit rejected scores, thanks!

No I oced all cores and I also tried 1.53.1 and still rejected

this benchmark is such a POS no matter what I do my validation will be invalid

not only does it say my validation is invalid http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=920739 but when i try to submit the other cpuz files it counts it as the same file

how to do it with less cores?

like people said the gap is too big first 1,5 points ok fine 2nd 1,2 points ok and the 3rd suddenly gets 0,1? so 2nd place takes work but 3rd is no effort at all? and if you say well then try to get 2nd place well too bad i dont have i7 sorry

sorry for the double post but what I still think is a problem is how theres a huge difference in points between something and 0.1 for example 9600 gt 1GB in 3d vantage 1.5 1.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 I think it should be more like 1.5 1.2 0.7 0.3 0.1

I respect the admins for working hard on rev 3 but you can't just say, we thought about this and no one used the test server so we're not changing it, to bad for you people here are giving good ideas on how to improve rev 3 and you just sit and say, it's fine, learn to bench EDIT: I just noticed that the system has been tweaked a bit. thanks!

that's probably at least 5 people now that chose to stop benching because of the new rev

0 why is this relevant that's just being ignorant