-
Posts
65 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Everything posted by Narmer
-
Thank you Pepek for writing this post because it didn't have time for this. Moderators - please check this results... In my opinion, it deserves to ban user.
-
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=847321 >500 fps in GT1 on Radeon 9550? Omfg... Please delete this result or ban user.... grrr. Maybe someone should check other his results. Sorry in my opinion such results should ban user
-
-> Validated score still wrong? Let us know here
Narmer replied to jmke's topic in Submission & member moderation
Thx Sweet for help. I want to see some models of those cars, photos etc, becouse I don't know any 9550 with memory over 380MHz, then we will know what to do. -
-> Validated score still wrong? Let us know here
Narmer replied to jmke's topic in Submission & member moderation
Ok, so I'm waiting too, but how long? Once more: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=809629 etc In Polish: Już mnie to wkurwiać zaczyna... -
-> Validated score still wrong? Let us know here
Narmer replied to jmke's topic in Submission & member moderation
I don't agree with this, becouse those all cards are different = many cores, many kind of memory etc. -
-> Validated score still wrong? Let us know here
Narmer replied to jmke's topic in Submission & member moderation
So what with this? -
-> Validated score still wrong? Let us know here
Narmer replied to jmke's topic in Submission & member moderation
Sweet Thx for reply and understanding, I dont think RomanLV's scores are cheated, but this results are very good for his platform (Athlon 64 etc), so I want to see card model, photos etc. So this results should be deleted? -
-> Validated score still wrong? Let us know here
Narmer replied to jmke's topic in Submission & member moderation
Hey, becouse now hwbot engine is strange, I dont have contact with user RomanLV from Overсlockers.сom.UA Team. Anyone who has contact with him, please show him this post. I want more proof to results of Radeon 9550, more specification and descrition, model of card, photos etc. Thanks in advance. http://hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=GPU_343 -
-> Validated score still wrong? Let us know here
Narmer replied to jmke's topic in Submission & member moderation
My run: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=700940 -
-> Validated score still wrong? Let us know here
Narmer replied to jmke's topic in Submission & member moderation
Could you check this result: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=797272 My vs his: T7100 1.8GHz vs T7100 1.8GHz GeForce 8600M GT 685/475 vs GeForce 8600M GT 670/470 13600 vs 17675 huh? My run: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=700940 -
[DR]r1ch Take it easy, I don't use validation with wprime, only screens so I'm clean Peace
-
Hi WoOx3r[Pt], hwbot have many bugs and hole in rules, for example if you want add score with 1.53 version you should do it in wprime program with "Submit scores" option, valid will be good, so? Is it cheating?
-
Keep pushing it ;] We can't break magic barrier 8k points
-
-> Validated score still wrong? Let us know here
Narmer replied to jmke's topic in Submission & member moderation
Ok, I don't know how can I do vmem mod on this model 9550 (Abit VGuru), so I must use jumper to overclocking mode (better voltage for vmem, but show as 9600), but it is still 9550 card, but ok, so let's wait. maxine thx for post and understanding. -
-> Validated score still wrong? Let us know here
Narmer replied to jmke's topic in Submission & member moderation
So,what about old results of cards like Radeon 9800SE etc with software (driver) unblock 8 pipelines? If I can't use now modded drivers so where is a justice? Or what with scores for example 9700 modded to PRO etc? One card and two scores... I want to show and discuss my scores, sorry, but I am not a cheater, so if I must show video I will do it, but I don't have a video camera. I don't add scores and I don't stay in hiding, but I want to be honest and I expect the same from others. -
-> Validated score still wrong? Let us know here
Narmer replied to jmke's topic in Submission & member moderation
How about drivers? Can we use only official approved ATI/nVidia drivers or modded too? How about my earlier post? -
-> Validated score still wrong? Let us know here
Narmer replied to jmke's topic in Submission & member moderation
It isn't problem with a mobo or card. I think the CPU platform is not stable(stable only for 3DMarks, but not at all), becouse sametimes I have the same problem with CPU-Z. Sorry, I forgot to attach photos of card: and screen with GPU-Z: -
-> Validated score still wrong? Let us know here
Narmer replied to jmke's topic in Submission & member moderation
Hey, I'm writing to describe my results in Radeon 9550 category: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=745049 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=745050 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=745053 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=745056 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=745057 Firstly, sorry for that I don't use GPU-Z (I have only one screen with GPU-Z), but when any test was end and I want to open GPU-Z it suspend PC, so I used RivaTuner. Next problem is that in screen you can see it is radeon 9600, but 9550 VGuru have jumper to swich overclocking option. So, we can see PC detect card like 9600... Why I wrote it? I want please moderators to check results and put theirs like "This result has been moderated by the hwbot crew...", becouse I won't have problems with it in future. Sorry for may crappy english. -
Which version is better for wPrime?
-
http://hwbot.org/user.do?userId=9509
-
-> Validated score still wrong? Let us know here
Narmer replied to jmke's topic in Submission & member moderation
How about with resolution 3DMark06 in laptop's card? -
thx demi http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=610877 can't see a card model what about this?
-
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=683495 bad category - Mobile Celeron 1.6Ghz in Mobile Celeron 1.8Ghz edit1 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=728404 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=728204 edit2 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=610877
-
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=680120 more proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=683495 bad category http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=727171 more proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=727924 bad screen http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=727962 more proof
-
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=726779