Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

Ol'Bud

Members
  • Posts

    147
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Ol'Bud

  1. Something is wrong.No verification URL and is there something wrong with the screenshot of the Wprime?? It looks "Blank".
  2. Something is wrong.No verification URL and is there something wrong with the screenshot of the Wprime?? It looks "Blank".
  3. DITTO. And a big pat on the back from me to placid / placido-oc for a great benchmark run.
  4. What a good run,Bones. 488.18 MHz is a new record ! http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1044368
  5. or force a recalculation in your profile "options"
  6. Thanks for the help, But I couldn't find what the issue was, I was going to ask for you all to just remove the submittal and I would run another if required. P.S. The latest FSB competition using the socket 754 motherboards looks like there are going to be some upsets in the world records there by some of the serious competitors using extreme means to cool systems. I don't have a 754 set-up at this time, maybe next time.
  7. I think this is the reason we are even working on this. http://www.hwbot.org/forum/showthread.php?t=4740
  8. Thor, He flagged my result for 3Dmark06 so I can't find anything wrong with it, I even gave a link to the ORB URL. Did he make a mistake and now it's screwing me up? http://service.futuremark.com/resultComparison.action?compareResultId=12311634&compareResultType=14 http://www.hwbot.org/community/submission/913347_olbud_3dmark_2006_radeon_hd_3200_rs780m_core_1625_marks&popup=true
  9. added the url to ORB so you can see it. http://www.hwbot.org/community/submission/913347_olbud_3dmark_2006_radeon_hd_3200_rs780m_core_1625_marks?tab=info
  10. or maybe you should take a new look at the way you responded.
  11. That actually showed your true intentions in the recruiting effort.
  12. You need to spend more time on your own website; At Madshrimps.com http://madshrimps.com/ and quit dick-ing around here messing with people.
  13. Monsieur COLARDYN, Someone has given you biased input as to how you should proceed with the method of scoring; They must have had an ulterior motive for doing so. Stand-up and be your own man and make the system fair for all BenchMarkers and OverClockers at HWBOT.ORG. New hardware, old hardware, It doesn't matter; It takes skills to complete the benches and get the screenshots and or online submittals to ORB accounts Without the system seizing-up and or crashing because the GPU can't take the pressure of the online submittal. MANY OF US ARE IN THE PROCESS OF ASSEMBLING NEW COOLING SYSTEMS TO CONTINUE TO BETTER OUR CURRENT SCORES, I am one of those people with new equipment not yet assembled. ?? Are you being prejudiced against common man teams who run Budget Equipment and Are Favoring those teams with members that have DEEP Pockets or lots of Money or are your inner circle of friends Perhaps it is for the benefit of members who have donated cash to support the site HWBOT.ORG ?? I suggest a review by yourself as to the system of scoring, You had a nice site and system of scoring before this Anal attempt to fix something that was not broken. I guess the only satisfaction will be to just upload my results to my ORB ACCOUNT and keep the scores there for the RECORD And post screenshots at another site for competitive advancement for items that are not uploadable to ORB. You forgot; It has to be fun, Penalizing participants for the past efforts is as Mean-Spirited as it gets. Mr.Clarke
  14. Merry Christmas and a Happy New year to all.
  15. That's a good thing to be aware of, Thanks for that clarification,Massman.
  16. still an immature response to members post. I'll try to ignore you.
  17. Roger that,Bruce. Not watching this thread any longer. Good Night.
  18. jmke, You missed the point completely. There are more than two posts reported for insufficient documentation. So,your WOOT"" is a bit immature, Don't you think ? And the taking of an adversarial" position with your fellow members at HWBOT is noted. But, you didn't have to do that; Your choice, not mine. I was hoping for a more analytical stance from you.
  19. That's not the motivation here; And I just reported a couple of entries with no supporting evidence. I'm not benching the particular CPU, I got a link to the item and took a look at it and now I have kicked the ball downfield to you, You can pick it up and run with it or just let it run out of bounds; We'll see.
×
×
  • Create New...