-
Posts
54 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Everything posted by Pepek86
-
Thanks for your interest. ... ... Irony
-
After two years any answer?
-
Ticket ID: 1436 Priority: Medium Hi\r\n\r\nI didn\'t use for a long time hwbot. But today I want log on my account \"Pepek\" and it\'s show me that is banned\r\n\r\nWhy?
-
Hi I didn't use for a long time hwbot. But today I want log on my account "Pepek" and it's show me that is banned Why?
-
Thanks man and sorry to give you trouble
-
Direct link works but if I want find in Browse processors, I can't do it. Also if I want submit score, when write 2800 this cpu doesn't exist
-
Ticket ID: 846 Priority: Medium Please add new proccessor to category Mobile Athlon 64 http://hwbot.org/browseHardwareProcessors.do?cpuSubFamilyId=194\r\n\r\nMobile K8 Athlon XP-M 2800+ (Dublin)\r\nI have valid after OC http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1095047\r\n\r\nit is symbol AHN2800BIX2AR\r\nhttp://img222.imageshack.us/img222/2997/p1000709u.jpg\r\n\r\nSpecification: http://www.cpu-world.com/CPUs/K8/AMD-Mobile%20K8%20Athlon%20XP-M%202800+%20-%20AHN2800BIX2AR.html
-
yes it's possible to create category but amd doesn't produce this cpu. Can you past screen from cpu-z
-
No. AMD has only near this symobl is 4400 or 4600 windsor
-
I'm not judge so I write this topic to watch them by moderators. And in first post I never said that Remiko is cheater. I write
-
Sorry but how can I call someone who consciously modify a score?? Yes you can if I have fake scores but if I have this it is maybay only smallest but no modify a score Thanks for cheacking and give the link to checker becouse I don't know about it since extremsystem cheaker break
-
http://www.hwbot.org/community/user/RemiKo User has many scores in category SPI 1M and PiFast which is very similar in appearance For example http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=835626 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=835421 Screens show the same checksum and subtime but final time is different. Submit in two other cpu category http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=860610 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=836144 Screen is the same in every piksel, only final time is diffrent and submit in two cpus http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=835625 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=835362 Screens is doing in the same time on system Windows and location windows of cpu-z and pifast is also identical http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=860629 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=867867 Screens have exactly the same appearance of position windows It's only some examples but he has also other scores which is suspect. I think moderators should look this
-
One user has two accounts and submits the same scores on both http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=867807 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=865052
-
Thanks for intervention. Thread can be close
-
Hi I am writting because I find on hwbot scores with my screens. User http://www.hwbot.org/user.do?userId=15029 stole my screen from my on-line auction http://www.allegro.pl/item357859185_357859185.html he set on hwbot score on CPU-Z, SPI 1M and 32M with my screens. I think that he is cheater and I have request to moderator or admin to block this resoult or user. THX
-
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=631781 on screen is 161sec but in hwbot set 121sec
-
wprime wrong version after 1.1.08 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=720434 1.61 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=720455 1.61 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=698104 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=721048 1.61 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=721030 1.61 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=697459 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=724427 1.61 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=721044 1.61 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=708604 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=731489 not enought proof, no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=731988 bad screen http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=731991 bad screen http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=729812 bad screen http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=729810 bad screen http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=732867 move from9200 PRO to 9200 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=732850 move from9200 PRO to 9200
-
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=731677 no proof, bad screen http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=728419 screen doesn't show cpu http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=727924 screen cover lap time http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=731744 no proof, bad screen http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=731737 no proof, bad screen
-
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=728376 no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=728432 no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=728392 no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=729414 no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=727171 screen is blurry http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=729303 no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=728628 wrong version http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=729300 wrong version http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=726678 wrong version http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=725352 wrong version http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=727273 can't see version http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=727159 wrong version http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=713774 wrong version http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=729232 wrong version http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=729220 wrong version http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=693178 brisbane in windsor category http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=699698 no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=699701 no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=645100 no resolution
-
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=701362 without checksum http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=678097 wrong category http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=670745 wrong version SPI
-
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=693178 it's brisbane in windsor http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=642387 without cpuz; doesn't show what core http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=595162 without cpu-c http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=673566 Total Phgisical Memory Allocated is 61757 but should be 61372 (cheat)
-
wrong category. Should be move to this http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_1578 Brisbane http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=700021 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=701885 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690085 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=693171 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690154 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690392 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690172 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690088 no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=699396 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=699407 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=699378
-
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=699378 no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=699396 no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=699282 no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=699407 no resolution