Everything posted by rbuass
-
Corsair & X5 Overclocking Party - Pics
I will ask Cleiton to resize the pics... Thanks for all
- k|ngp|n - GeForce GTX 680 @ 1700/3800MHz - 65792 marks 3DMark05
-
Why i not benching for hwbot?
I am sure Hwbot will not ignore... Only with exemplary punishment can moralize .... obviously if applicable punishment
-
Corsair & X5 Overclocking Party - Pics
Schenckel bros are not only excellent overclockers, but also exceptional photographers
-
Corsair & X5 Overclocking Party - Pics
Thanks friends... We will do at least one event like this per month...more if is possible, This really are improving the level of brazilian overclockers. Today we just have top dogs like Schenckel Bros and Gnidaol everytime with us.
-
Problem - I can not validate event's 3dMark05 result
Thank you very much friend
-
Corsair & X5 Overclocking Party - Pics
to give more pression to dry ice can help to down the temperatures
-
Why i not benching for hwbot?
Easy and clear... This work for us: To sum up: - one desk - two OC systems with components they used for the scores - 5500 3930K - 1200C9 memory - 7970 lightning 1650/1860 (+/_ 25mhz range) - same SSDs Validation process: - start livestream with both systems mounted, but not turned on - first bootup at superzero temperatures to show active systems - prepare systems to bench (drop temperatures etc) - start run 5500/1200/1650/1860 (+/_ 25mhz range) simultaneously when finished: - make screenshot - save validation file - upload validation file instantly - zoom in on screen to show score Note: - screenshot must contain notepad with nickname, gpuz, cpuz cpu/mb/mem, 3dmark11 score (like MOA submission) - user must move 3dmark11 window to show it's active - the idea is that both participants get a similar score as they got in the competition on two separate systems, each doing their own overclocking and run simultaneously. So...adjust parameters to MAD222 and John Lam Play in GB boards... And reach scores good enough to prove there are 2 systems that can play simultaneous... For us, the moral and the ethic required to play to times... For us, they tell about to be 99,99% obvious (is what all complainers told about me and gnidaol).... and was needed to prove... And now??? how much percent obvious??? In my point of view, is not hard to HK guys play in a Live and show is possible...then...clear for all. You did not see I tell thet are guilty, because they have 0,01% ... but when lots of guys accuse me and Iuri, it was required. Sorry again the bad english
-
Problem - I can not validate event's 3dMark05 result
Can I send to your email?
-
Why i not benching for hwbot?
I believe MANY MORE AND BIGGEST problem to me, was not the PRIZE...and my name...my moral....my ethic. Not the prize.... plus, I consider Hwbot more important than a free trip to Taiwan. Further, I am going to Taiwan to an overclocking competition...not to Vacations... Brazil to Taiwan to compete = more time inside aircraft than in Tw ... lol
-
Why i not benching for hwbot?
Friends from Hwbot!!! I can not agree what you show us!!! "John Lam mentioned he uploaded the wrong score because they got mixed up". Since me and Gnidaol was required to prove in a live stream (AND WE HAVE DIFFERENT SO, DIFFERENT BOARDS, DIFFERENT TIMINGS, DIFFERENT VGA CLOCKS, DIFFERENT BIOS, DIFFERENT SSD, DIFFERENT VALIDATION KEYS, AND SO ON)... Plus... Even was mandatory for us to use tha same background and hardware...what force to be many more similar Plus If we coud not reach results today we were cheaters Plus LN2 and hardware is many more expensive Sorry to tell you... one size to all;;; I see no difference to require to do the same in a Live Stream. Please attempt I did not accuse MAD but same people request from Gnidaol, can be fit to John Lam. Thanks
-
Why i not benching for hwbot?
Different way to different people... I remember few days ago... when me and Gnidaol hold a place to the MOA finals... With NO ONE proof, El Gappo bring public insinuations and accused me and Iuri...lots and lots of false insinuations... After about hundred of false accusations and false insinuations without no one proof, Hwbot told us that was necessary (mandatory) to prove we were not guilty (in no one place in the world, people need to prove that have no guilty... BUT is necessary to prove the guilty to make accusations)... So... We feel sad and worry about 3 days (we lose's the mother's day in Brazil...feeling sad because we could lose our well deserved place to MOA)... We spent LN2 (very expensive here) and one more day (we need to bench in Live Stream TO PROVE we were not guilty)... And more...was needed to win MOA 2 times to can go to Taiwan... "Question" If one of our videocards was death, or our system was not able to get the scores to win the second time???. Today... we were be consider as cheaters (El Gappo... I hope it did learn you some good things). Only to remember: http://hwbot.org/forum/showpost.php?p=173706&postcount=286 I understand, after El Gappo complaining and his followers, a tempest of false accusations, Hwbot require for us to be benched again with lots of risk to lose our place in the finals... with much less evidence (I understand, but still not agreed) And now???? What will be the decision after this evidences? Looking forward to see the decision. (I really consider Mad222 a great overclocker and very good people, but unfortunately looks for Slamms have full reason) Thanks Slamms
-
Corsair & X5 Overclocking Party - Pics
Another funny overclocking event in Brazil. About 20 hours benching....live stream sessions... and lots and lots of knowledge sharing... Pics: We have been joining the overclocking community in Brazil to lots of events. I think this is the best way to show how funny it can be. Thanks for Corsair and X5... and sure, to my friends Gnidaol Jacson Cleiton Paulo11 Joe90Br Rafael Eraldo Hugo Carlos Darkvenom Reverton And all overclockers that follow the live stream with us. Best regards...see you in the next
- Viss - Core i7 3770K @ 6930MHz - 10.38 sec PiFast
-
Problem - I can not validate event's 3dMark05 result
I did try without www. but still not works How can I proceed?
-
Problem - I can not validate event's 3dMark05 result
Everytime I try to validate result, using the validation URL, I got this message: Failed to convert property value of type java.lang.String to required type java.math.BigDecimal for property gpumemoc; nested exception is org.springframework.core.convert.ConversionFailedException: Unable to convert value "18--" from type java.lang.String to type java.math.BigDecimal; nested exception is java.lang.NumberFormatException Validation error: A valid futuremark compare url is required if want to reach the 3DMark05 Hall Of fame. As only 12.0 benchmark scores are better than you, you need to provide additional verification. We made a Live event, with Live Stream, and we did try to validate the results, but was impossible for today. One more nice event here. https://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.472981216053507.112304.100000248990657&type=1 Thanks in advance
-
Problem - I can not validate event's 3dMark05 result
We got a new GTX 680 WR at 3DMark05, but unfortunately, I can not validate. Thats the HWbotr message: Validation error: A valid futuremark compare url is required if want to reach the 3DMark05 Hall Of fame. As only 12.0 benchmark scores are better than you, you need to provide additional verification. That's the link (url Required) http://www.3dmark.com/3dm05/5460327 That's the result Thanks in advance
- Mad222 - Core i7 3770K @ 6839.5MHz - 4min 47sec 750ms SuperPi 32m
- Christian Ney - DDR3 SDRAM @ 1922.9MHz - 1922.9 MHz Memory Clock
-
Mad222 - Core i7 3770K @ 6937.9MHz - 5sec 171ms SuperPi
Mad to #1.... Great job friend
- Viss - Core i7 3770K @ 6450MHz - 3sec 562ms wPrime 32m
-
Diabolo 80 - Radeon HD 7970 @ 1730/1830MHz - 3687.2 DX11 Marks Unigine Heaven - Xtreme Preset (DX11)
Great job man... 1730 Mhz on Unigine is insane.
- dx4picco - 4x Phenom II X4 960T BE @ 3817MHz - 0sec 0ms SuperPi
- dx4picco - 4x Phenom II X4 960T BE @ 3817MHz - 0sec 0ms SuperPi
- Solid Snake - XS - Core i7 3770K @ 6805MHz - 5sec 297ms SuperPi