rbuass

Lol... Need to ask for a friends.... That's a pity they not agree I hardmod their cards... so I think 4 cards can really fly

Thanks all friend from hwbot.

Hi friends. Missing 100 points to WR http://hwbot.org/submission/2265687_ I need this to hold a Overclocking Emperor achievement. Thanks in advance

Top 4, .... vem buscar ... Na apresentação ao vivo, falei publicamente (está gravado) que o resultado do Andre (que é meu amigo) é "imbatível", que buscariamos o segundo lugar, que ele quebrou todos os WR porque é extremamente fera, mas que tem suporte e ajuda da ASUS, portanto consideraria como um #1, quanto ao mod, cearence, vc nem sabe o que significa, moda radinho de pilha

amazing efficiency....I naver saw nothing like this

Veja o que ele falou no forum de vcs....que eu não sei nada...que não faço nada...e manda ele fazer isso aí. Abraxxxx

Sorry Massman, ... , is not agains nobody and not personal, but still think the result is very easy, if compare with a hardoverclocked videocard... was just set AB with all voltages to the max, and go ahead. Thanks

I understand friend... I would like to go... is possible we meet and overclock there... Thanks and best regards P.S. i posted this cause we have a discussion about it...so...some guys told that to overclock hard is needed to know how overclock multi cards....lol

Grande trabalho man....essas VGAs aí são golden....o trabalho tb. Abraxxxxxx

Not about you Mad... you are really a great overclocker and usually get great efficiency and skill...I am talking about the bonanza about the guys with 4 cards...that don't need to work to get good scores

WR points please. Its not computed. http://www.hwbot.org/submission/2264477_ http://www.hwbot.org/submission/2264475_ http://www.hwbot.org/submission/2264478_ Thanks in advance

daaaaaa... i don,t know why something post this...why you do notspend your time doing better things?

My points was stoled (lol)... There were some error, and I have no one result surpassed me, but my points got from 979 to 956 without reason... Thats the problem: As you can see, I went #3 to #4, and after went #4 to #3 again (#3 is correct place)... So the system got my points but not give me back after I return to correct place (#3). Please fix

Great job man... 3 times at 1500 Mhz was amazing

ué....subiu mais no vantage que no 11????

Hi! I posted here (I don't know if its a right place), but something wrong happens with my results. I have no one result did surpass me today and yesterday, but weird i was stoled with 28 points (lol). http://hwbot.org/submission/2258836_rbuass_unigine_heaven___xtreme_preset_(dx11)_radeon_hd_7970_3599.41_dx11_marks Thats the result and yesterday I did have more than 980 points... now I losed and I have 953 points Please check and fix (I think I found the problem...) But I still in second place... and I do not know why hwbot get my points....so I losed 28 points without reason Thanks in advance

I do not consider PCMark05 as bench (I do not like and I do not bench)....but this result comes from a great overclocker 3D like you is really awesome. Keep pushing

Taí outro resultado que vc acha ruim.... tenta chegar nele cearence

Thats the correct way to give your opinion Gunslinger... You talked your point of view...and sure lots of people think the same...

Same here I can not understand how a overclocker can think your way... Once only the best score will be rewarded...and it WILL BE rewarded... why give more chance to who haves more cards,,, Is totally out ... I can not understand why this rule was changed

Is not limite best score. The best score will be able .... but only 1 score per benchmark... So... everybody will take equal chances... If the guy haves best score with 4 cards...or with 1 card... only will get his best score. If the guy do not have 4 cards... he can compete same chances...and take his best score. If the guy knows "for exemple" how to bench Unigine or 3DM11... and have 4 good cards in the air... he will take lots of points more than the guy that can do same work but only haves one card.

The question is not to "can afford" or can not afford 3 or 4 cards... The question is to make more competitive...so give equal chance to who can afford...and to who can not afford multi GPUs (IMHO) If hwbot give only 1 result per benchmark, people that can afford will take his better result (only the better)...and people that can not afford take their only result... Against... If hwbot keep the way is now... people that can afford the cards can post 1, 2, 3 and 4 results... and people that can not afford still take their ONLY result. Only do not understand...and only do not see.... who do not want... Lots of guys that can afford will be against to change....but lots of guys that can not affor will agree.

Sure friend! I think the rev 3 way was better...and only the best result get the score (1 score per benchmark), but some people agree...some people do not agree...and I understand is impossible to be 100% good for all... But to enthusiast league, more $ means many more chances to get boints...even with not better scores... This way, make sure will be more competitive...and if the guy want to bench 4 cards... he will keep doing a good job...since his 4 way were his better result. I hope you understand

You kill the RAM scores.... Congratz to the milestone

We are talking only about Pro and Extreme Overclocking point of view.... Tell me now... What about the guys that belong Enthusiast League. Tell me that the guy with 4 cards have no many more chance to get hwboints that a guy that haves only one. You can keep your argument....and tell I can compete with 2 VGAs (I still think is not the best way....but I agree and will compete 1 VGA or 2 VGA and do my best).... But now... to the guy that much effort to buy one...and lose easy to guys that amount points with multi cards... Further...there are many many few people that plays multicards at subzero...so multi cards + non sub zero just a good choice. I hope you understand me