Strunkenbold
-
Posts
2204 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
37
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by Strunkenbold
-
-
I need this RAM! nice job!
-
I was referring to this:
[HWBOT-975] - When adding a hardware item with "+"-symbol via Admin site, the safename does not get propper formatOr am I wrong here?
-
I think I saw some bug fixed in the release notes which could affect this. Could you try again?
-
-
-
Thx, this is indeed very lucky. Best out of 5 chips. The other one's cant even do 3 GHz....
@ObscureParadox
No just WinXp, there shouldnt be much difference between those two anyway... Oh and sorry, I just didnt read this earlier.
-
Wish I had a cpu like this. Absolutely outstanding result. Ram freq is just crazy on this platform....
-
Dont know if this has reported before, but anyway it should be a quick one.
On every benchmark page (like wprime 32) with "Overclock record overview", the displayed position of the personal best is the position of the user in the specific hardware ranking not in the global ranking.
-
Congrats on result! But according to the new rules you need to display result.txt and picture of storage. So please resubmit. thx!
-
Ongoing discussion?
Something to add. As you added earlier today a K6-2+ 400, we might want to add the whole product line.
#1 the link you posted for the k6-2+ 400 doesnt work, it leads to the normal, non plus version
#2 Rename K6-2 570Mhz to K6-2+ 570Mhz
#3 add K6-2+ 350Mhz
#4 add K6-2+ 475Mhz
#5 add K6-III 333Mhz
#6 add K6-III 350Mhz
#7 add k6-III 366Mhz
#8 add k6-III 380Mhz
#9 add k6-III 433Mhz
#10 add k6-III+ 366Mhz
#11 add k6-III+ 475Mhz
#12 add k6-III+ 500Mhz
#13 add k6-III+ 550Mhz
#14 rename all K6-3 cpu's to K6-III
#15 rename all K6 cpu's from "mhz" to "Mhz"
more info:
-
You submitted a wrong score.
You scored 27.80, but you posted 27.8.
I guess the bot does automatically removing the zero...
Would be different if he scored 27.08 and fills in 27.8 then he actually gave time away....
Is there any reason why you dont fill in 27.78 according to your screenshot?
edit: nevermind bobnova already said everything...
-
Easy to fix but shouldnt happen anyway. One user with two results with points in ranking.
-
Is this still under discussion or is there something wrong about this?
-
What I then see is:
GMA HD (Sandy Bridge)
GMA HD (Sandy Bridge) Mobile
GMA HD 2000
GMA HD 2000 Mobile
GMA HD 3000
GMA HD 3000 Mobile
GMA HD P3000
GMA HD (Ivy Bridge)
GMA HD (Ivy Bridge) Mobile
GMA HD 2500
GMA HD 4000
GMA HD 4000 Mobile
GMA HD P4000
Yup, and having this list like that here on HWBot would be perfectly fine. Atleast as we already started with this scheme with GMA HD. Its using same gpu in desktop and mobile (Iron Lake). The only fact is that GPU-Z says incorrectly Arrendale and Clarkdale. Now if we say everything is one, regardless of socket or marketing name, we would have to unite these also.
Moreover, GPU-Z started to report Sandy Bridge GPU's now correctly. Means GT1 for HD, GT2 for HD2000 and GT2+ for HD3000.
Atleast I dont know what speaking against creating multiple sections. I would be very interested to know if theres some kind rule on HWBot which makes it clear what qualify's for a new hardware category and what not.
-
Some database fixes:
#1 change core name of "82810 Integrated Graphics" to Whitney
#2 change core name of "82815 Integrated Graphics" to Solano
#3 change the name of "82830 Integrated Graphics" to Extreme Graphics Mobile (830GM) and its core to Almador
#4 change the name of "82845G Integrated Graphics" to Extreme Graphics Desktop (845G(L,V)) and change core name to Brookdale
#5 Merge 82852 Integrated Graphics and 82852 Integrated Graphics to Extreme Graphics 2 Mobile (852GM(E), 854, 855GM(E)) and change core name to Montara
#6 change name of GMA 865 to Extreme Graphics 2 Desktop (865G(V)) and its core name to Springfield
-
Some more info:
http://www.notebookcheck.com/Intel-HD-Graphics-Sandy-Bridge.56666.0.html
http://ark.intel.com/products/53492/Intel-Pentium-Processor-G860-3M-Cache-3_00-GHz
Please also add:
Intel GMA HD (Ivy Bridge)
http://ark.intel.com/products/65527/Intel-Pentium-Processor-G2120-3M-Cache-3_10-GHz
Intel GMA P4000
http://ark.intel.com/products/65733/Intel-Xeon-Processor-E3-1225V2-8M-Cache-3_20-GHz
-
Ticket ID: 1639
Priority: Medium
Please add Intel GMA HD (Sandy Bridge) to database.
-
I just came across this submission.
Intel says its HD Graphics. Not HD2000 or HD3000. Seems we are missing a category here:
GMA HD (Sandy Bridge)
-
Ok, thats what we already knew then...
Though, we could debate now if the different sockets make a difference. As we have cpu's in the database that are 1:1 identical except their connection to the mobo. Doing the same for integrated graphic cards would be just consequent.
-
Well Im fine with this decision... I will start reporting the submissions which are in the wrong category. (plenty of work)
Next thing:
945GME should be renamed in 945GSE (or GMA 950 (atom))as stated in post #2
GMA 950 with 64bit Memory bus should get their own section
-
Last guess for today: We dont create an extra section for this. As those people could buy them an qm77 notebook?
-
Ok qm77 has oc support. But just for cpu or gpu also?
-
The HD3000 in a mobile chip is identical to the one in a desktop chip.
Ok fine. But still you can't plug mobile chips in a Z77 mobo. So whats the solution now?
-
This is what I found here
FB - 100kOhm
VSEN1 - 50kohm (OVP @ 115% DAC = 2.05V
I tried it some years ago, FB works but cant get higher than 1.8xV before mobo gets very unstable. Probably I did the OVP mod wrong.
The official HWBOT Team Cup 2013 - SC1: 1M Challenge thread.
in HWBOT Competitions
Posted
bump.
Please add Callisto and Heka to the list. These are all Denebs with just one deactivated core. And these were Highend chips because they were all BEs.
When you allow Athlon II budget cpu's with deactivated cache, you should also allow cpu's with deactivated cores. At least this is what makes sense to me....