Strunkenbold
-
Posts
2200 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
37
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by Strunkenbold
-
-
Same Problem as Mr. Paco, with K10 and DDR2 mobo... 1.60 works though...
-
Outstanding. Congrats.
-
Wow under 3h is simply insane! Hope you can get a screenshot of your run soon.
-
Thx. Im looking forward to see your next result!
-
Ticket ID: 1506
Priority: Low
(1)Wrong socket, should be 775:\r\nhttp://www.hwbot.org/hardware/processors?from=processor_251#key=core_2_k6400_2.66ghz\r\n\r\n(2) There are some people claiming to use a LANparty UT nF3 250Gb with their core 2 x cpu. This cant be right. http://www.hwbot.org/benchmark/superpi/rankings?hardwareTypeId=motherboard_197#start=0#interval=20
-
Ticket ID: 1492
Priority: Medium
Still only C300 in database...\r\nhttp://www.crucial.com/eu/store/partspecs.aspx?imodule=CT128M4SSD2
-
There's only one answer... New anti-sandbagger tactic by massman. Confuse everyone over the end time!
:beer:This makes perfectly sense.
-
Endtime: 15-3-12 12:00:00 (noon) CET
1 day, 5 hours to go
So this is wrong then?
-
Isnt it necessary to have a valid submission to be accepted from the bot? Apart from that, this is a crazy result!
-
So.
1) Overclock AMD K6
2) Win Bulldozer
Will be very tough to beat Turricans record. The one who crack the 800Mhz mark probably deserves the price.
-
Better than Duck.
OVERALL WR -
np, thx for your efforts.
-
There is for some reason, already the ax59 pro in the database. But it has the wrong brand: "Via" instead of AOpen.
http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/ax59_pro/
Oh and chipset is not "Via V3" its Via MVP3.
-
-
-
Now that the competiton is over, how did you guys managed such high scores in the Virus scan test?
.......I never broke 200mb/s.
Theres no specific trick. Its probably that your board cripples your ram performance. Also Onboard cache enabled? Use Wpcredit to find out. Enabled in the Bios doesnt mean its actually really enabled.
maybe interesting:
http://www.amdzone.com/phpbb3/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=45317
downloads:
http://k6plus.com/index.php?name=Downloads&req=viewdownload&cid=1
-
strange problem with pentium 3 superpi32m results. In the list every result is 2hxxminxxsec where it should only be 1hxxminxxsec
look here for instance.. http://www.hwbot.org/hardware/processor/pentium_3_celeron_1.0a_ghz_tualatin/
still there...
-
strange problem with pentium 3 superpi32m results. In the list every result is 2hxxminxxsec where it should only be 1hxxminxxsec
look here for instance.. http://www.hwbot.org/hardware/processor/pentium_3_celeron_1.0a_ghz_tualatin/
-
More people complained about the advanced search than about the hw database. We are running with very limited funds and a spare-time crew, I can't do magic.
Sorry, I didnt want to offend the crew. People complained about search because it wasnt that good in rev3. But in rev4 its already a lot better. I know this rev is written from scratch but people, or at least me, expected same functionality as rev3.
Anyway decisions are made, I will wait.
-
No, it's planned for 4.2 (1 Aug) as 4.1 has more urgent features (advanced search).
How can a search be more urgent then a database? A search would mean u already know what ur looking for, that could be, especially for cpus, very tricky.
-
thx didnt know...
too much time to go till then...
-
Dont know if this was mentioned earlier, but Im desperately missing the cpu & gpu database. Where is it? Its not in the hardware tab...
Am I blind??
-
EHEC Döner uahrgh...
-
links doesnt work:
http://uat.hwbot.org/hardware/processor/core_2_q9550_2.83ghz
http://uat.hwbot.org/hardware/processor/core_2_e4300_1.8ghz
http://uat.hwbot.org/hardware/processor/pentium_4_mobile_2.0ghz
http://uat.hwbot.org/hardware/processor/pentium_4_3.0_ghz_northwood
http://uat.hwbot.org/hardware/processor/pentium_3_celeron_1.0a_ghz_tualatin
and many more...
PCMark05 Tweaking Thread
in Benchmark software
Posted
Thx for showing this. For me this gives me only 3-4pages extra on AMD. I fear there is something not right...
"Internet Explorer restricted this..."
When setting http to "1", error goes away. Anyone know the problem?