Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

Strunkenbold

Crew
  • Posts

    2200
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    37

Posts posted by Strunkenbold

  1. Thanks Scotty! The CPU is a golden one. The Abit doesn't match the DFI but my Ultra-D needs new caps before I can use it again.

    Unfortunately I'm a moron and forgot about the taskbar thingy. I deleted this result, as it makes no sense to remove it from the compo while let it in the rankings if its against the rules.

    On a sidenote:

    The rule with the taskbar was there to have a chance of identifying the OS which is still needed due timer issues between Win 7 vs 10 and later. GPUPi, even in its standalone variant, checks the correctness of the system timer. So if you have a valid datafile, your result is 100% technical correct. The same thing goes for scores with BM, where it even displays the used OS. No need to see my lousy taskbar. I would propose to remove the taskbar rule for all benchmarks where a datafile or a verification link is needed.

  2. On 9/29/2022 at 4:23 AM, MachineLearning said:

    Thank you kindly. :)

    I did make a mistake calling the Dimensity 1050 the MT6879; MT6879 is (as you added) the Dimensity 920, which is identical to the 1050 except for mmWave support & the GPU (Mali G68-MC4 vs G610-MC3 respectively). They are even on the same node (TSMC 6nm). CPU-Z identifies it as MT6879, which I suppose is dead-on per the CPU side.

    So, does this matter for submissions? Should I submit MediaTek Dimensity 1050 under 920?

    Makes no difference to me how you do it, I just am interested in knowing. ;)

    Thanks again!

    Ok I renamed the category to Dimensity 1050. Seems there is no MTxxxx number known for it.

    • Thanks 1
×
×
  • Create New...