Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

Strunkenbold

Crew
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    2197

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    36

 Content Type 

Posts posted by Strunkenbold

    ultra_code - Athlon 64 4000+ (Toledo) @ 3228.5MHz - 452 cb Cinebench - 2003

    in Result Discussions

    Posted

    AFAIK this category goes back to a request on Discord. It has some sort of legitimation. 

    The E6 is actually indeed a Toledo. These are harvested dual cores with one core disabled. AMD however actually never named them Toledo and CPU-Z doesn't detect them, which makes this topic complicated.

    You can read more after this post in german hwluxx forum.

    The question however is, if this category should stay. I postponed a decision on this for some time now. If I think about some other AMD CPUs which unlocks to different cores because they used different harvested cores for their lowcost variants, it wouldn't be the same logic for these, means I would have to separate them too. 

    • Like 1

    PLEASE ADD OTHER HARDWARE THREAD:

    in Support

    Posted

    On 6/5/2023 at 6:50 AM, Spicer1104 said:

    Z270x Soc Force -Ln2, thought it was added but it wasn't. Some are labeled as the normal gaming soc, some had soc force ln2 on them

    z270ln2r9-min.png

    Is this pre-production / prototype board? Do you have a CPU-Z verification?

    Discussion of GPU Categories for Quadro/Tesla/Grid GPUs in Database

    in Support

    Posted · Edited by Strunkenbold

    Thx for this massive write-up. What you see here is a big mess because of some limitations the bot has since the beginning. If a GPU model is used in multiple product families, we have to add a second GPU Core like GA102' or GA102GL. I have only with a new core the possibility to link it to a new Subfamily. So most of the problems you see here is our laziness. And I honestly dont want to inflate our db with gazillions of the same cores just with an apostrophe on their end. 

    I proposed years ago to have a similar organisation like the CPUs in the db. Means: Manufacturer >> Family (architecture) >> Subfamily (Product range) >> Specific Model. I dont know if this scheme is accepted by our owner and will be programmed. Until I dont have an answer, I wont do much work on this cause I dont want to do things twice and the effort for Nvidia would be huge. In the end we would need to a massive cleanup anyway, touching every card, but thats something I dont have time for at the moment. Mistakes like wrong GPU cores and specs will be fixed though, its best to write me a PM if you spot something. 

    The question why AMD is organised another way is simple: I had the time for it back then and it felt necessary. The reason was AMD spawned multiple recycled cards with same specs but different names even under other under product families but GPU-Z cant distinguish them. To combine the cards I also had to remove the subfamilies and group every model under their specific architecture. I could ofc do the same for nvidia but again, it would be better to fix this the proper way. 

    Fixed:

    Quadro RTX 5000/6000/8000 are listed as RT102/104GL cores, but I think should be TU104/102 cores
    Quadro RTX A6000 is listed as having a TU102 core, but I think it should be a GA102 core
    Geforce GTX 780 (2880 Shaders) is under Geforce 600 series, should this be under Geforce 700 series?
    Geforce 830A is under Geforce 900 series, should this be under Geforce 800 series?

     

×
×
  • Create New...