-
Posts
313 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by OptyTrooper
-
-
Get over it then. It was a competition Scotty and not related to friendship on any level here onNot any more. You pissed me off.my end.
Point being you shouldn't take it personally b/c it was not. I would have done the same if it were it any other team and you know it.
-
You just can't keep civil tongue can you?Didn't we hear this song already?
151 Golds speak for themselves brother. Browse the dual socket rankings and come back with something smart to say.
-
I have them all. Wish Massman would allow old runs b/c I could just end this right now.
-
LOL! Too bad.
-
New runs or can we use old submissions?
-
You've watched Star wars one too many times Massman. That answer was very Yoda.When delays stop being unforeseen -
Agreed.
Hi buddy I noticed you never jumped on the crucify Opty bandwagon @ CP.Time to lock this one.Never got to thank you so thanks.
-
Stop your cryin'. You're getting tears all over your skirt dude.
You got off easy and you know it. You made it personal Scotty. TO show you just how much better I am than you I will give you my next CPU MP 2000 Pally. Consider 1 chip down many more to go boss. Oh! wait and when rev. 4 hits CP will be so ass out you'll bleed for months. The goood news is since I'm the only one who benches "classic" hardware for my team it counts as the top. That sounds nice.
So off I go too overclock in my skirt Scotty. After all it's a warm night.
-
Wow you penalized them a whole .1 point. I'm sure that stung. It matters not anyway b/c after rev.4 Team CP will be a non-entity.
Opty out.
-
Massman:"Using the same hardware within the same stage would be hardware sharing"
That's what they did and admitted they did it. I mean can it be more clear?
-
Not surprising comment considering your thick as thieves with CP. On your note however I have been nothing but civil.
-
It's not like you all got together and benched the card Scotty. It was deliberately mailed to you free for a express purpose. That constitutes hardware sharing under the rules including competition as has already been outlined. It's illegal. You know it, I know it, and the staff knows it.
-
Perfect!
Scotty this is not personal it's a competition. I have been nothing but civil. Lord knows you had to sit by for months and watch me smash enough of your socket A scores. I'd be testy too.
BTW that's a joke Scotty before you start yammering about lines in the sand.
Knopf I don't know about good faith. It was done b/c Scotty is the only one who stood a chance.
-
I'll take one.Maybe we should start awarding "I fling poo t-shirts"? -
It's true, the 7950 I'm using in the april comp is Frank's (MrPaco), all the other equipment is my own. As I understand, the team type monthly challanges encourage team members to use the best of what they have as a team to enter. It's not the same as benching for personal points, and I have not benched this card for anything but this monthly contest, and will not.
@ AN (Opty) - You just couldn't stand the fact you couldn't get by me could you? So you try to pull a bitch stunt like this? You should be ashamed of yourself. I thought you were bigger than this.
Who resorted too name calling Scotty? And who says I already didn't pass you. I'm better than @ socket A on my worst you know it and so do I. Hell the only reason your doing so well is I sold one of my NFII's for a song. The only time I personally referenced you was as a friend so shame on you sir.
This wasn't hating it was clarification now that it's clarified so be it.
-
If and when you quote someone make sure you quote it EXACTLY as it was said...
I NEVER told you I lent StoneAge my card. He's not even competeing.
Okay then who did you tell me you lent the card too Paco? I know you loaned it to Scotty.
-
Agree - the competition doesn't give you any improvement in boints and the sharing rule was exactly about that. And this situation came up only because a GPU benchmark is ranked by CPU.
It's like we've made a PCMark05 run with different videocards as stages but without dividing by CPU.
So it's up to the crew to think about such a case.
Again allowing it only encourages further such behavior.
-
But sharing is sharing and if you it slide now it will encourage this behavior in the future.
-
indeed. gpu looks really identical. wish it had a software id so we can discriminate which is which.
could a cheat like this have been avoided?
maybe make a rule for this sort of competition that the hardware of team mates must be completely different?
B/c it's the same damn card.
-
I doubt they'll provide it. I was personally informed by one of their members the card pased from Paco bc/ he couldn't take the top to StoneAge no go still and on to Mr.Scott. A lot of these guys I consider friends but cheating is cheating period.
-
http://hwbot.org/competition/hoc_apr11?tab=stage%205
If you look at the submissions by CP you'll see the progression of the cards travel.
-
Okay I resubmitted it:http://hwbot.org/community/submission/2145558_optytrooper_wprime_32m_athlon_64_4200_x2_windsor_26sec_37ms
But if go to the rankings still no boints...:http://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/athlon_64_4200_x2_windsor?tab=2drankings#/manufacturer.rankings.do?applicationId=14&manufacturer=amd&hardwareTypeId=CPU_1142&hardwareType=CPU&tabid=cpubenchmarks
Sorry to bother but 4.3 points is 4.3 points especially these days.
It's odd b/c it will award me the boints then promptly take them away....I no get it. Make Opty angry!
-
I mean: if we split up in "workstation" and "server", there are only two platforms that should be used for best score. Splitting up per platform gives more different setups.
Agreed. Keep things simple yet varied. There are enough dual-socket platforms to keep folks plenty busy. I'd love to be a fly on the wall when some "top guns" get ahold of a K8N-DRE and have no idea how to make it overclock.
-
Wait a minute all the submission info is there in the link so why can't it be fixed for me again?
HWBOT Rev.4 - The Plan.
in HWBOT Rev.4
Posted
Sooooo..... Maybe it should be renamed rev. 4 2012