windwithme
-
Posts
546 -
Joined
-
Days Won
6
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by windwithme
-
-
DDR3 Parameters Setup Page
If your system is unstable after OC, you can fine tune non-Auto items.
For example, you can change to 2T or rise the CL to enhance the stability.
Voltage Page
Pull high CPU clock, you needs to add CPU Vcore. Pull high DDR3 clock or better latency, you need to add DRAM Voltage.
If you pull high both CPU and DDR3 clock, ex. 200/1600 or 180/1800, you need to adjust QPI/Vtt Voltage.
In general condition, I recommend DRAM Voltage 1.660V and QPI/Vtt Voltage should below 1.250V.
PC Health Status
Due to built-in GPU, i3-540 cannot run CPU/DRAM at 200/2000.
You only can set 200/1600 or 180/1800 (depends on quality) to achieve the best OC ratio.
If you want to reach 200/2000 as P55 in this All in one platform, you need to add an external graphic card.
DDR3 Bandwidth Comparison
DDR3 1333.4 CL6 6-6-18 1T 1.400V
ADIA64 Memory Read - 8855 MB/s
Sandra Memory Bandwidth - 10407 MB/s
MaXXMEM Memory-Copy - 8116 MB/s
DDR3 1800.2 CL9 9-9-24 2T 1.600V
ADIA64 Memory Read - 11181 MB/s
Sandra Memory Bandwidth - 13510 MB/s
MaXXMEM Memory-Copy - 10778 MB/s
DDR3 1600.2 CL7 8-7-21 1T 1.600V
ADIA64 Memory Read - 11902 MB/s
Sandra Memory Bandwidth - 14362 MB/s
MaXXMEM Memory-Copy - 11690 MB/s
You can see Intel Clarkdale DDR3 performance is similar to AMD platform under non-OC condition.
But after OC, the DDR3 performance is far away ahead AMD.
Even though, comparing to Intel quad-core P55, X58 bandwidth is far behind. But i3-540 has quite good DDR3 performance.
Configuring with CORSAIR 4GBX2 1600, the official spec is CL9. It looks quite conservative.
No matter Intel or AMD platform, it can reach 1600 CL7 8-7-24 1T.
The bandwidth also increases a lot. In Intel platform, it can reach 1800 CL9 2T.
OC Performance Test
CPU 180MHz X 23 => 4140.5MHz
DDR3 1800 CL9 9-9-24 2T 1.600V
Hyper PI 32M X4 => 14m 49.202s
CPUMARK 99 => 644
Nuclearus Multi Core => 16189
Fritz Chess Benchmark => 15.63/7500
CrystalMark 2004R3 => 173900
CINEBENCH R11.5
CPU => 3.46 pts
CPU(Single Core) => 1.39 pts
-
CPU Full Speed - 83W
System idle power consumption 52W is not too low.
However, the full speed is only 83W to bring out 32nm advantage.
If you enable C1E, it’s only 38W at idle status. I believe it’s very low consumption in PC.
3D Performance
Built-in GPU Intel Clarkdale 733MHz
3DMARK 2006 => 1752
3DMARK VANTAGE => P371
CPU SCORE => 8956
GPU SCORE => 281
StreetFighter IV Benchmark
1024 X 768 => 20.62FPS
Intel Clarkdale OC to 1033MHz
3DMARK 2006 => 2223
3DMARK VANTAGE => P580
CPU SCORE => 8909
GPU SCORE => 442
StreetFighter IV Benchmark
1024 X 768 => 26.85FPS
After OC GPU, the 3DMARK 2006 increase 27% and 3DMARK VANTAGE increase 56%.
For the game StreetFighter IV Benchmark, it’s also 30% higher.
Even for most mid to high end GAME still cannot run smoothly, it’s still helpful for normal 3D GAME performance.
If you pull high CPU/DARM ratio, the GPU OC range will be lower.
Maybe it’s caused by Intel integrated GPU into CPU. If you OC the GPU, please watch out this issue.
BIOS OC Setup
Main BIOS Tuning Menu, called M.I.T.
I set CPU clock at 180MHz to match DDR3-1800 ratio.
CPU Related Items
C1E is power saving feature. When CPU utilization is low, CPU will lower the frequency automatically.
If your DRAM cannot reach 1800, you can change the ratio at System Memory Multiplier.
-
Test Configuration
CPU: Intel Core i3-540
MB: GIGABYTE GA-H55M-UD2H
DRAM: CORSAIR CMX8GX3M2A1600C9
VGA: Intel Clarkdale GPU
HD: WD 640AAKS 640GB 7200rpm
POWER: Be Quiet! Straight Power Deluxe 400W
Cooler: Intel original cooler
Default Performance (C1E Disable)
CPU 133.3MHz X 23 => 3067MHz
DDR3 1333.6 CL6 7-6-18 1T 1.400V
Hyper PI 32M X4 => 19m 20.549s
CPUMARK 99 => 478
Nuclearus Multi Core => 11961
Fritz Chess Benchmark => 11.65/5590
CrystalMark 2004R3 => 131958
CINEBENCH R11.5
CPU => 2.56 pts
CPU(Single Core) => 1.03 pts
Windows Experience Index - CPU 7.3
PCMark Vantage => 6333
Compare to previous AMD X4 640. I3-540 performance is lower about 10~25% in many multi-core benchmark.
On the other hand, Spuer PI, CPUMARK for single core performance, it’s higher around 18~20%.
Windows Experience Index 7.3 is same. PCMark Vantage, i3-540 is higher 2%.
X4 640 4C/4T compares to i3-540 2C/4T, the performance is different by benchmark software identity.
Temperature
System Idle - 31~32
CPU Full Speed - 52~57
Intel Burn Test v2.4，Stress Level Maximum
The latest 32nm manufacture is really helpful for the temperature.
Even though the original cooler is thin, the full speed temperature is still under 60.
After enabling C1E, the temperature even goes lower. The idle status is only 19~22. Core i3 is very good at idle temperature.
Power Consumption
System Idle - 52W
-
It’s been years for users to select different components to make own DIY PC.
Advantage of DIY is freedom.
Comparing to brand PC, there is only one brand to provide after service.
The DIY PC can have the vendors or distributors warranty.
For this warranty, you have to go to different service center by different components.
However, you can choose your favorite brands and suitable products.
This is the main reason for DIY PC users are interested in computer technology or studying before buying.
Windwithme also mentioned in previous article that most DIY PC users are concerned about budget.
So they set the budget first and search for suitable products.
This review is introducing Intel platform with built-in GPU to make a good C/P PC.
Last review is AMD mainstream PC guide.
This time, I will use similar budget to compare the Intel platform.
My original idea was putting Intel and AMD PC in one article.
However, the content is too long, so I divided into 2 parts.
If you are interested, you can compare to these 2 guides.
I believe you can have more idea for current mainstream hardware performance and price.
Also, it can help you to make decision before buying.
CPU Part
I use Intel current hot sell model Core i3-540.
3.06GHz, 32nm manufacturing, 4MB L3 Cache, Revision K0.
Physical 2 Cores with Hyper-Threading for 4 threading, called 2C/4T.
K0 version is adding ID(PCID) technology into processor.
Most users all hope new version can be better at OC.
The price is 3350NTD, around 112USD.
Inside Box
Product manual, original cooler, Intel Core i3-540
Upper-Right is cooler bottom. It’s 100% aluminum also with thermal pate in the bottom.
Lower-Left is Intel Core i3-540. LGA 1156 Socket.
It’s recommended for H55/H57 chipsets.
You also can use P55 chipset, but the GPU function will be disable.
DRAM Part
Recently, the DDR3 4GB price is very cheap. You can choose 2GBX2 or 4GBX2.
If you have more budget and plan to use 64Bit OS, 4GBX2 is better pick.
I use CORSAIR DDR3 1600 4GBX2. 1600 version price is a little higher.
CORSAIR is internal well-known brand and famous in quality control. The price is acceptable.
The price is around 115USD.
CORSAIR CMX8GX3M2A1600C9
Core i3 can support DDR3 1333 without OC.
For Intel platform, you just pull CPU clock, the DDR3 can reach 1600~1800.
If your budget is limited, you can use DDR3 1333 or 2GX2.
MB Part
H55 or H57 chipsets are first choice for Intel built-in GPU platform.
The main difference is H57 supporting Raid, but H55 price is lower.
You can find many models and spec in the market.
I choose mid-price GIGABYTE H55M-UD2H. it’s 3500NTD, around 117USD.
GIGABYTE GA-H55M-UD2H Look
Ultra Durable 3, 2oz copper PCB, 100% Japanese made capacitors
3x USB Power supports On/Off Charge which can charge iPhone, iPad and iPod touch easily.
USB 3x Power also provide more stable power to external USB devices.
CPU PWM 4+2 phases
2 X PCI-E X16 supports ATI Hybrid CrossFireX technology.
The bandwidth is X16+X4.
Audio chip is Realtek ALC892. It supports 7.1 channel and Dolby Home Theater surrounding technology.
GIGABYTE also has another model, H55M-S2V, spec and components are lower. The price is 700NTD cheaper, around 24USD.
Power Supply Part
I pick Be Quiet! Straight Power Deluxe 400W which is E6 product line.
The price is 2400NTD, around 80USD.
80Plus Copper Certificate, Active PFC design, 18dBA super silent 12cm fan, 5 years warranty.
If you only use PC for word processing and no more graphic card upgrade need, you can consider Be Quiet! L6 350W.
HDD still use WD 640AAKS. The cheap price is main advantage even the performance is not the best.
If you need more capacity, currently 1T~1.5T HDD price is only a little higher. You just need to study the HD performance more.
In Intel platform, CPU and MB price are few hundred NTD higher.
If including Case, DVD-ROM, the price is around 16260NTD, 524USD.
Many users trust in Intel brand or performance due to the Intel structure.
The configuration is not absolute.
If you don’t need such high performance, you can pick cheaper one.
However, if you need higher performance, you can buy the better spec one.
Per your need, budget and brand, you can make your own configuration to enjoy the DIY fun.
-
CPU Full Speed - 64~66
Intel Burn Test v2.4，Stress Level Maximum
As thermal meter, the standby and full speed temperature after OC is around 2~4 degree C comparing to default.
After OC, the temperature is a little higher than default. Maybe it’s AMD 45nm characteristic?!
Power Consumption
Standby - 68W
CPU Full Speed - 204W
3D Performance
Built-in GPU ATI Radeon HD 4250 830MHz
3DMARK 2006 => 2138
3DMARK VANTAGE => P417
CPU SCORE => 11567
GPU SCORE => 315
StreetFighter IV Benchmark
1024 X 768 => 25.88FPS
When OC the ATI Radeon HD 4250 clock from 560 to 830MHz, the 3D benchmark software improve around 30%.
880G is capable for general 3D application or games. If you need to run some professional 3D application, you better to add a grapgic card.
During the test, the pity is the revision C3 X4 CPU cannot enable L3 Cache.
Even though as my experience, the L3 Cache doesn’t improve performance much.
However, enableL3 Cache is for personal feeling. This is the main difference between C2 and C3.
Of course, C3 also has some strength. As per the internet, C3 has better memory compatibility. It’s helpful for DDR3 OC range.
As per my experience, the same voltage, C3 OC range is around 100~200MHz to C2.
AMD strategy is focus on mid-low market for years. You can see in this segment, CPU and chipset price are lower.
For the mid-end to hi-end market, the performance is lower than Core i and DDR3 performance is also lower.
I do hope AMD K10 structure ca improve this issue. However, so far AMD is still focus on multi-core and higher C/P value.
After buying Case and DVD writer, you can build your own PC. The budget is around 15500NTD.
If you have any preferences of price, performance or brand, you can adjust your budget.
If the 3D performance is not enough in the future, you just need to spend 2000~ 3000NTD for graphic card upgrade.
This DIY PC could be the mid-high performance and mid-low price choice.
After sharing AMD 2010 mainstream platform, I will share Intel platform asap.
Due to the year end, the Intel mainstream platform will be done near year end or early 2011.
Wish you keep supporting my original review article. Thanks
This article is also published in my personal blog. WIND'S 3C
You are welcome to check any time.
-
PC Health Status
Previously, as my experience of using 785G, 790GX or 890GX, the AMD CPU can OC to 300MHz mostly.
For the BIOS setup and DRAM multiplier, you have to pay more attention for these setup, then you can join AMD 300MHz club.
DDR3 bandwidth comparison
DDR3 1607.2 CL9 9-9-24 1T 1.400V
ADIA64 Memory Read - 9205 MB/s
Sandra Memory Bandwidth - 12044 MB/s
MaXXMEM Memory-Copy - 10903 MB/s
DDR3 1600 CL7 8-7-24 1T 1.600V
ADIA64 Memory Read - 9557 MB/s
Sandra Memory Bandwidth - 12588 MB/s
MaXXMEM Memory-Copy - 11545 MB/s
AMD started to build in Memory Controller into CPU since K8.
During that time, it really created the better bandwidth and memory clock, However, years passed, the Core i series performance has over it.
The CORSAIR DDR3 quality is very good. The official spec is 1.400V for DDR3 1600 CL9.
I set as DDR3 1600 CL7 8-7-24 high performance parameter. It just needs 1.600V to pass all benchmark software.
OC Performance
CPU 300MHz X 12 => 3599.8MHz
DDR3 1607.4 CL9 9-9-24 1T 1.400V
Hyper PI 32M X4 => 20m 28.284s
CPUMARK 99=> 463
Nuclearus Multi Core => 15673
Fritz Chess Benchmark => 17.56/8428
CrystalMark 2004R3 => 185249
CINEBENCH R11.5
CPU => 3.86 pts
CPU(Single Core) => 1.01 pts
WindowsExperience Index - CPU 7.4
PCMark Vantage => 6314
X4 640 default clock is 3.0GHz. After OC to 3.6GHz, some benchmark improves 20%.
Windows Experience Index doesn’t improve much.
Or we can say, since the index over 7, the score cannot improve much dues to the highest score is 7.9.
PCMark Vantage is a multi-factors benchmark software, the performance improvement is not much.
For original cooler, long time run at 3.6~3.75GHz can be stable.
Temperature
Standby - 32~34
-
Power Consumption
Standby - 59W
CPU Full Speed - 150W
45nm X4 CPU power consumption is not so good, but it’s still better than the standard.
It’s still a power saving system. I hope AMD can implement 32nm to lower the power consumption.
3D Performance
Built-in GPU ATI Radeon HD 4250 560MHz
3DMARK 2006 => 1757
3DMARK VANTAGE => P302
CPU SCORE => 9919
GPU SCORE => 228
StreetFighter IV Benchmark
1024 X 768 => 20.87FPS
These years, AMD built-in GPU performance is better than the others.
Above 3D performance is still lower than entry graphic card, but compare to the other built-in GPU, the 3D performance is pretty good.
880G built-in ATI Radeon HD 4250, the 3D performance is around 20~25% lower than own 890GX HD 4290.
BIOS OC Setup
Main BIOS tuning page, called M.I.T.
CPU clock set to 300MHz, you need to adjust CPU NorthBridge Freq./HT Link Frequency.
I suggest you to set at X7, 2100MHz. It’s helpful for the stability after pulling CPU to 300MHz.
Voltage Page
DRAM Voltage control 1.300~2.500
CPU NB VID Control -0.600~+0.600V(0.025V)
CPU Voltage Control -0.600~+0.600V(0.025V)
Memory depends on DRAM quality. The range set at CPU/DDR3 as 300/1600.
CPU Voltage Control/DRAM Voltage Control bases on memory quality to adjust the voltage.
If 300MHz is not stable, you can adjust NB Voltage Control to 1.3000V.
DDR3 set up is CL7 8-7-24 1T
Built-in ATI Radeon HD 4250 Setup Page
It can share up to 512MB system memory and OC the clock from 560MHz to 830MHz.
CPU Unlock can enable X2/X3 CPU to X4 by chance.
CPU Core Control is more detail features. If X2 cannot enable to X4 stable, you have one more option to enable to X3.
-
80Plus Copper Certificate, Active PFC design, 12cm low acoustic fan, 3 years warranty.
If you just use for word processing and no need external graphic card, you also can consider blow 400W product.
HDD uses WD long life model, 640AAKS. The performance is not so outstanding, but the price is its main advantage.
I used to use WD 15EARS. The performance is only 75MB/s which is similar with 640AAKS.
If you have higher capacity need, currently 1T~1.5T HDD price is also only a little bit higher.
You just need to check the performance in advance.
The above components are not must.
If you don’t need such high performance, you can choose cheaper products. On the other hand, you can buy more high end one.
Base on your demand, budget and favorite brand, you can choose whatever you want. It’s the most fun for DIY PC.
Configuration
CPU: AMD Athlon II X4 640
MB: GIGABYTE GA-880GMA-UD2H
DRAM: CORSAIR CMX8GX3M2A1600C9
VGA: ATI Radeon HD 4250
HD: WD 640AAKS 640GB
POWER: Antec High Current Gamer 400W
Cooler: AMD original cooler
Default Performance
CPU 200.9MHz X 15 => 3013.7MHz
DDR3 1607.4 CL9 9-9-24 1T 1.400V
Hyper PI 32M X4 => 23m 50.367s
CPUMARK 99=> 393
Nuclearus Multi Core => 13227
Fritz Chess Benchmark => 14.94/7172
CrystalMark 2004R3 => 153603
CINEBENCH R11.5
CPU => 3.40 pts
CPU(Single Core) => 0.87 pts
Windows Experience Index - CPU 7.3
PCMark Vantage => 6222
X4 640 default frequency is 3.0GHz already, so it’s capable for most applications.
Even for the file converting performance is also good due to the quad core multi-tasking.
The original cooler is around 1670rmp under BIOS control. The acoustic is very low.
If it’s in full speed, it’s 3260rpm which is louder in bare system. The noise is acceptable inside the chassis.
Temperature
Standby - 28~31
CPU Full Speed - 62~65
Intel Burn Test v2.4，Stress Level Maximum
The standby temperature is very low. This number is satisfied.
The full speed is 62 degree C and it’s too high for bare system.
X4 640 original cooler is too slim. It may cause the temperature too high.
-
These years, the DIY PC market seems to be smaller and smaller.
The main reasons are Notebook popularized and Netbook, Apple iPad launched.
Most users just use computer for internet surfing or email.
However, the internet topic of how to build a DIY PC is still very popular so far.
Many users will search info by budget or needs to build own DIY PC.
There are many friends ask me how to build the DIY PC.
I think there are 2 kinds of mainstream PC.
One is all in one MB, which built-in GPU. The price is lower and budget is around 11000~13000NTD, 365~431USD.
The other one is discrete with graphic card for 3D online game.
The price is still the key concern. We just pick the entry model. The budget is around 14000~16000NTD, 465~531USD.
However, in my personal idea, I still recommend to add more budgets.
Some hardware like VGA or HDD, you can enhance performance and spec for just pay more few hundred NTD.
Also, you can use this PC longer.
For this kind of article, I hope I can share every year.
Last share is early 2010, Intel annual best buy Micro ATX PC with Core i3-530 boxed cooler OC guide.
Recent 2 years, AMD more emphasize in fair price.
The low price multi-core CPU strategy is more and more acceptable for end users.
This time, I set the budget at 15500NTD, around 515USD, to build a high C/P value PC for your reference.
CPU Processor
I buy the most popular entry X4 CPU - AMD Athlon II X4 640.
3.0GHz, 45nm, 2MB L2 cache, Revision C3
Recently, AMD launched X4 645, 3.1GHz, and price is a little higher.
So after considering, I still pick higher C/P X4 640. The price is 2950NTD, around 98USD.
Inside the box
Manual, sticker, cooler, Athlon II X4 640
Upper Left is cooler bottom, 100% aluminum, and thermal paste.
Lower Right is AMD Athlon II X4 640, AM3 socket and compatible with AM2+. AMD platform has better extensibility.
DRAM
DDR3 price keeps dropping. There are more and more 4GB DDR3 kit in the market.
If you have more budgets and may need 64-bit OS in the future, 4GBX2 is the better choice currently.
I use CORSAIR DDR3 1600 4GBX2, dual channel. The price is a little higher.
CORSAIR is a well known international brand and passed the dual channel stability test. The price is still acceptable.
The price is around 125USD.
CORSAIR CMX8GX3M2A1600C9
As AMD in non-OC condition, the system can run at DDR3 1600, so I choose 1600 DDR3.
If your budget is limited, you can choose DDR3 1333 or 2GX2 kit.
Mainboard
For building AMD platform, there are 2 kinds of chipset.
880G and 890GX are built-in GPU. 880G price is lower and many brands can choose.
I use GIGABYTE 880GMA-UD2H. The SB is SB850, supporting SATA3 and NEC USB3.0 technology.
The price is 3500NTD, around 116USD.
GIGABYTE GA-880GMA-UD2H
CPU PWM is 4+1 phase.
2 X PCI-E X16, supports ATI Hybrid CrossFireX and bandwidth is X16+X4.
Audio is Realtek ALC892, supports 7.1 channel and Dolby Home Theater surrounding technology.
The same chipset series, there is also one more model, 880GM-UD2H. The SB is SB710 and no SATA3 and USB3.
This model price is around 600NTD, 20USD, lower than 880GMA. If you have limited budget for MB, you also can consider this.
Power Supply
I use Antec High Current Gamer 400W, HCG series is Antec latest product line.
The price is 2490NTD, around 83USD.
-
LOST PLANET 2
DX11 1920 X 1200 TEST A - 40.1 fps
In the same GPU clock, let’s compare the performance by CPU difference.
3DMark Vantage GPU score is almost the same, but the CPU score raise around 13%.
FINAL FANTASY XIV, DEVIL MAY CRY4, StreetFighter IV Benchmark 3D performance also raise a little.
However, it doesn’t mean higher CPU clock doesn’t help 3D performance. It’s possible that CAPCOM games don’t rely on CPU.
In the market, there are many GAME needs high CPU ability.
For Intel hi-end X58 platform, the entry model price always keeps at 300USD.
Since i7-920, i7-930 and i7-950 are all in this range.
The hi-end one is 32nm 6C12T 980X Extreme to replace 45nm 4C8T 965/975 Extreme.
So if you own LAG 1366 platform, you no need to envy 2011 Sandy Bridge.
After all, LGA 1155 is 32nm 4C8T i7 product line, so far there is no news about 6C12T CPU.
LGA 1366 is long life product in Intel platform.
Since Nov 2008 launched, Intel will launch new LGA2011 chipset in 2011 Q4.
This part is not same as LGA 1156 users which need to upgrade soon.
In multi-core performance, 980X and 990X can provide upgradeable higher performance.
Although I know the price is high, but it’s still better than no 32nm 6C12T CPU can choose.
Last thing about X58 product line is X58 having wide product range in the market due to every vendor launched many models in past 2 years.
The most entry X58 chipset MB is same as X58A-UD3R around 250USD.
Compare to the other same price range P55 products, even the entry X58 products spec is still better than P55.
This is windwithme 15th LGA 1366 review in past 2 years. I hope it can be your reference data before purchasing.
This article is also published in my personal blog. WIND'S 3C
You are welcome to check any time.
-
OC Performance
CPU 200 X 20 => 4000MHz 1.392V
DDR3 2000 CL8 9-7-24 1T 1.600V
Hyper PI 32M X8=> 14m 04.133s
CPUMARK 99=> 628
Nuclearus Multi Core => 26426
Fritz Chess Benchmark => 30.61/14690
CrystalMark 2004R3 => 313158
CINEBENCH R11.5
CPU => 6.88 pts
CPU(Single Core) => 1.40 pts
Windows Experience Index - CPU 7.7
PCMark Vantage => 18251
After i7-950 OC to 4GHz, you can compare the detail performance difference.
The performance increases over 20% in most benchmark software.
There is only Windows Experience Index is almost the same.
It’s due to Windows Experience Index is the estimate system performance. It doesn’t test too detail items.
This system get 7.7 of 7.9 is very high score already.
I used to test several better quality Core i7, most need 1.30~1.392V to OC to 4.2GHz. Just for your reference.
3D Performance
3DMark Vantage => P17254
CPU SCORE => 54034
GPU SCORE => 14063
StreetFighter IV Benchmark
1920 X 1200 => 210.98FPS
DEVIL MAY CRY4
1920 X 1200 => 154.46/127.41/166.21/116.81 fps
FINAL FANTASY XIV
1920 X 1080 => 3209
-
FINAL FANTASY XIV
1920 X 1080 => 3172
LOST PLANET 2
DX11 1920 X 1200 TEST A - 37.5 fps
GTX460 is mid-end VGA market, and its performance is quite well in the above games.
OC version clock is 715MHz which is higher than normal GTX460.
3DMark Vantage is also over 17000. LOST PLANET 2, need very high 3D performance, is over 37 pages as well.
BIOS OC Setup
Main BIOS Tuning Menu, called M.I.T.
System Status and Info
CPU 200Mhz/DDR3 2000 Setup Page
Memory Setup Page
Advanced DDR3 Parameter Setup
Voltage Page
Load-Line Calibration Standard/Level1/Level2
CPU Vcore 0.50000~1.90000V
QPI/Vtt Voltage 1.075~2.015V
CPU PLL 1.300~2.520V
IOH Core 1.000~2.000V
DRAM Voltage 1.300~2.600V
Besides CPU, DDR3 quality, voltage is also important for OC.
You can see the X58A-UD3R setup pages above, QPI/Vtt Voltage is important for pulling high clock.
CPU operates at 200/2000 stable will need 1.45~1.55V.
The voltage setup is the key factor for OC X58 chipset.
DDR3 Bandwidth Comparison
DDR3 1865.2 CL8 9-7-24 1T 1.500V
Sandra Memory Bandwidth - 28574 MB/s
ADIA64 Memory Read - 16057 MB/s
MaXXMEM Memory-Copy - 21755 MB/s
DDR3 2000 CL8 9-7-24 1T 1.600V
Sandra Memory Bandwidth - 30813 MB/s
ADIA64 Memory Read - 21072 MB/s
MaXXMEM Memory-Copy - 21755 MB/s
LGA 1366 platform is the only platform supports 3-channel technology. The DDR3 bandwidth is extremely high.
Especially, when OC to DDR3 2000, the performance is almost double.
DDR3 performance increased is the key strength for Intel phase in Core i7.
-
System Configuration
CPU: Intel Core i7-950
MB: GIGABYTE GA-X58A-UD3R
DRAM: CORSAIR DOMINATOR-GTX3 DDR3-2400
VGA: GIGABYTE GTX460 OC
HD: Intel X25-V 40GB RAID 0
POWER: CORSAIR Gold AX750W
Cooler: Mega Shadow Deluxe Edition
OS: Windows7 Ultimate 64bit
Default performance
CPU 133.2 X 24 => 3197.8MHz 1.088V
DDR3 1865.2 CL8 9-7-24 1T 1.500V
Hyper PI 32M X8=> 17m 04.626s
CPUMARK 99=> 504
Nuclearus Multi Core => 21816
Fritz Chess Benchmark => 24.63/11822
CrystalMark 2004R3 => 257373
CINEBENCH R11.5
CPU => 5.53 pts
CPU(Single Core) => 1.12 pts
Windows Experience Index - CPU 7.5
PCMark Vantage => 15799
i7-950 spec is over 3GHz already. When user enable Turbo Boost, the clock can pull to 3.2~3.3GHz.
i7-950 can get very good scores in most common benchmark software. The CPU performance has achieved high end segment.
Also, DRAM can OC to DDR3 1866 without pulling CPU frequency and combine exclusive 3-channel technology, the overall performance can be enhanced more.
This time, I use new mid-end VGA - GTX460. I also test some 3D benchmark to compare the LGA 1366 performance.
3D Performance
3DMark Vantage => P17078
CPU SCORE => 47850
GPU SCORE => 14063
StreetFighter IV Benchmark
1920 X 1200 => 209.18FPS
DEVIL MAY CRY4
1920 X 1200 => 156.96/133.44/161.89/115.24 fps
-
I still remember Intel launched new platform in November 2008. It started the Core i7 Age.
This platform is LGA1366, and CPU is Core i7 series. The chipset is X58+ICH10R.
Half years later, Intel announced LGA 1156 platform and CPU has Core i3, i5 and i7 which is wider product range.
For LGA 1366 market position is not big impact compare to P55.
Currently, LGA 1366 platform strength are 3-channel memory and multi PCI-E x16.
The weakness is X58 power consumption is higher. The entry model is same as mid range LGA 1156 platform.
End of March, Intel announced first 32nm 6-cores 980X CPU for X58 platform to extend its’ life cycle.
Internet also has many news about next 6C12T Core i7-980X in 2011.
Back to our topic - Intel Core i7-950. Blue box is representing Intel.
The price is 9100NT, around 299USD.
Inside the box, there are CPU, original copper-bottom cooler, manual and Intel sticker.
The clock is 3.06GHz, support Turbo Boost to achieve 3.33GHz.
Physical 4 Cores with Hyper-Threading to reach 8 threading, also called 4C/8T.
45nm manufacturing, Max TDP 130W, 8MB L3 Cache. The spec above are all entry LGA 1366 CPU spec.
MB is GIGABYTE X58A-UD3R, the entry model for high end X58 chipset.
The price is around 7500NTD, 250USD.
Light blue and white colors design. The overall components and design are good.
Lower-Left Corner
2 X PCI-E X16 supports X16 and 2-Way/3-Way ATI CrossFireX/NVIDIA SLI technology.
2 X PCI-E X16 supports X8
Realtek 8111E LAN Chip
Realtek ALC889 supports 7.1 channel and High Definition Audio/Dolby Home Theater technology
Design in Taipei
Lower-Right Corner
6 X Blue SATAII, provided by ICH10R, SATA2 supports RAID 0, RAID 1, RAID 5 and RAID 10
2 X White SATAII, provided by GIGABYTE SATA2 chip, SATA2 supports RAID 0, RAID 1 and JBOD
1 X IDE, provided by GIGABYTE SATA2 chip
2 X White SATAIII, provided by Marvell 9128, SATA3 supports RAID 0, RAID 1
Dual BIOS, dual protection
Upper-Right Corner
6 X DIMM DDR3 supports 800/1066/1333/1866/2200(OC) and the maximum capacity is DDR3 24GB.
DDR3 uses 2 phase PWM and next is 24-PIN power connector.
Upper-Left Corner
LGA 1366 CPU socket. The electroplating metal cover for better looking.
Back is 8PIN design, UD3R uses 12 phase PWM to fulfill X58 platform Core i7 power.
IO
4 X USB 2.0(Black/Yellow)
2 X USB 3.0(Blue)
1 X RJ-45 LAN port
2 X eSATA/USB 2.0 combo (Yellow)
1 X S/PDIF Fiber/Coaxial output
1 X 1394a
clr CMOS button
-
Sorry, its 2600K
-
CPU
Intel Core i7-2600K
32nm, 4C8T
MB BIOSTAR TP67XE
Chipest Sandy Bridge - Cougar point
DDR3
CORSAIR DOMINATOR-GTX3 DDR3-2400
CL9 11-9-27 1.65V
System Configuration
CPU: Intel Core i7-2600K
MB: BIOSTAR TP67XE
DRAM: CORSAIR DOMINATOR-GTX3 DDR3-2400
VGA: GIGABYTE GTX260 OC
HD: CORSAIR CSSD-F40GB2 Raid 0
POWER: Antec TPQ-1200W
Cooler: Mega Shadow Deluxe Edition
OS: Windows7 Ultimate 64bit
Default Performance
CPU 100 X 35 => 3500MHz (Idle 1.044V, Full 1.008V)
DDR3 2133.8 CL9 10-9-27 1T 1.5V
Hyper PI 32M X8 => 14m 24.460s
CPUMARK 99=> 539
Fritz Chess Benchmark => 27.53/13212
AIDA64 Memory Bandwidth - 21901 MB/s
OC Performance
CPU 100 X 50 => 5000MHz (Idle 1.452V, Full 1.392V)
DDR3 2133.8 CL9 10-9-27 1T 1.5V
Hyper PI 1M => 07.551s
CPUMARK 99=> 770
Fritz Chess Benchmark => 39.25/18839
AIDA64 Memory Bandwidth - 25235 MB/s
This article is also posted in my blog: WIND'S 3C
Welcome 3C fans to drop by.
Thanks
-
Video
1280 X 720 => CPU 23%
1440 X 1080 => CPU 22%
Battery Duration
6Cell battery, Battery Eater Pro (turn off wifi and bluetooth)
Full Speed - 1:21:19
Standby - 3:47:28
Acer Aspire 5741G
Performance ★★★★★★★★☆☆
Components ★★★★★★★☆☆☆
Specification ★★★★★★★★☆☆
Outlook ★★★★★★★★★☆
C/P Value ★★★★★★★★★☆
(If Using HDD 500GB & ATI HD 5450)
Finally, I attach the Spyder2 color correction file for all 5741Gusers.
Thanks for reading this Acer Aspire 5741G review.
This review also post in my blog WIND'S 3C
Welcome 3C lovers to visit and advise.
-
ATTO DISK Benchmark over 128k benchmark result is max read 283.7 Mb/s and write 261.8 MB/s
EVEREST File Benchmark over 1024k benchmark result also above 250 MB/s.
CrystalDiskMark 4K QD32 Read - 105.3 MB/s Write - 62.26 MB/s
AS SSD Benchmark
Seq Read - 192.96 MB/s Write - 52.90 MB/s
4K-64Thrd Read - 105.67 MB/s Write - 47.51 MB/s
3D - ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5650, 1024MB GDDR3
3DMARK2006 - 7235
DEVIL MAY CRY4
DX10 1280 X 720 => 69.13/64.87/93.97/51.07 fps
StreetFighter IV Benchmark
1280 X 720 => 85.50FPS
Biohazard5 Benchmark
1280 X 720 => 19.5fps
DRAM performance
DDR3 1064.2 CL7 7-7-20 1T
Sandra Memory Bandwidth - 7354MB/s
EVEREST Memory Read - 9063MB/s
CPU Temperature
Standby - 39~45℃
CPU full speed - 74~80℃
-
Acer Aspire 5741G uses Intel latest Calpella structure.
CPU is Intel Core i3-330M. The clock is 133 X 16 => 2.13GHz, L3 3MB, dual core and supports HT technology.
The chipset is HM55. Comparing to GM45, I believe the performance will be much better.
Performance test
OS is Windows7 Ultimate 64Bit
Hardware info in Device Manager
Windows7 system performance
CPU performance test
Super PI 32M => 33m 49.943s
CPUMARK99 => 327
Nuclearus Multi Core => 8243
Fritz Chess Benchmark => 8.06/3869
CrystalMark 2004R3 => 128764
CINEBENCH 11.5
OpenGL 12.16fps
CPU (Single Core) 0.69pts
MP Ratio 2.54x
PCMark Vantage => 8607
Using high performance MLC SSD-CORSAIR F60 to test
Size is 2.5” and ID is F60. The highest performance is 285/275 MB/s.
Random 4K writing performance can reach 50000 IOPS which improve the 4K writing issue in past SSD.
-
Acer Aspire 5741G
Lower right side is monitor lock and SD memory card slot
SD / MMC /
/ MS / MS Pro
15.6” matte monitor, the resolution is 1366X768. The open degree is 140~150.
Right Side
2 X USB 2.0\8X Super Multi DL DVD\anti-thief lock
Left side
Power in, thermal holes, D-SUB, RJ45 LAN, HDMI, USB, Mic in, Line out
6 Cell battery => 2524g
-
PCMark Vantage => 17668
When OC Core i5-760 from 2.8GHz to 4.2GHz, it can pass most benchmark software.
Also, due to every software has different CPU utilization and demand, the performance increases 25~50%.
If the heat dissipation well, 4~4.2GHz is allowed clock for long time usage.
CPU voltage needs 1.42V to OC to 4.2GHz. If you just OC to 4GHz, you need around 1.32V.
The voltage set up will be different by every CPU quality. It’s just for your reference only.
Power Consumption Test
Standby - 158W
CPU Full Speed - 285W
When OC to 4.2GHz, the CPU performance increase a lot, but the temperature and power consumption is also pulling higher.
Also, I disable C1E power saving feature, the power consumption all pull to very high.
Intel new revision Core i5-760 OC capability is very good. If you enhance the CPU thermal solution, 4.2GHz is not a hard thing.
For the default clock power consumption, it’s almost same as Micro ATX platform.
It’s 4 Cores CPU and combo with Radeon HD5830, the system performance is much higher than small form factor PC.
If for normal application without OC, this Intel platform is good for performance and power saving.
LGA 1156 has been launching for 1.5 years, the mature and wide selections.
32nm built-in GPU, Core i3/i5 CPU.
They are all 2C4T structure and support H55/H57 chipset.
45nm Core i5/i7 are 4C4T or 4C8T structure. P55 is mainly supported chipset. P55 spec and OC ability is higher.
Even though, LAG 1155 will be launched in next Jan to combo with 32nm 4Cores CPU and P67 chipset,
for the market revolution, LGA 1155 MB price will be higher than LGA 1156 a lot.
Short term, for the users would like to buy Intel platform, P55 and i5-760 is still the higher C/P Intel 4 Cores CPU platform.
I also happy to see the LAG 1156 price can move lower after new platform launched.
The users can pay less and get more performance products.
Last sharing was Canon IXUS 200IS using guide.
I just got a FUJIFILM FinePix F80EXR recently. I will find some time to write a experience sharing review.
This article is also in my bolg.WIND'S 3C
Welcome all friends to visit.
-
After setting the DDR3 clock, the more important is the detail parameters.
Starting from CL9, then move to CL8 or higher/lower frequency.
Voltage Page
Load-Line Calibration
CPU Vcore 0.50000~1.90000V
QPI/Vtt Voltage 1.050~1.990V
PCH Core 0.950~2.000V
CPU PLL 1.600~2.540V
DRAM Voltage 1.300~2.600V
CPU and DRAM quality is varied; you need to adjust the CPU Vcore and DRAM Voltage.
If you want to pull CPU frequency to 200/2000 ratio, the key item is QPI/Vtt Voltage.
For my experience, when OC to CPU/DRAM 200/2000 performance, QPI/Vtt Voltage is around 1.21~1.25V.
PC Health Status
There are many P55 products, and every brand has different OC capability.
But the set up is similar; you just need to take time for fine tune.
Through the steps, every user all can get better CPU/DRMA performance in air cooling condition.
Comparing DDR3 Performance before and after OC
DDR3 1328.4 CL5 5-5-15 1T
Sandra Memory Bandwidth - 16762 MB/s
EVEREST Memory Read - 15656 MB/s
DDR3 2000 CL8 8-8-24 1T
Sandra Memory Bandwidth - 23670 MB/s
EVEREST Memory Read - 17941 MB/s
DDR3 2060 CL8 8-8-24 1T
Sandra Memory Bandwidth - 24301 MB/s
EVEREST Memory Read - 18395 MB/s
After OC DDR3 1328 to DDR3 2000 performance, EVEREST increases about 15%.
Sandra Memory Bandwidth increases more, it’s about 41%.
OC DDR3 is really improving the system performance. It can be better with OC CPU together.
CPU 200 X 21 => 4199.9MHz
DDR3 2000 CL8 8-8-24 1T
Hyper PI 32M X4 => 9m 52.146s
CPUMARK 99=> 651
Nuclearus Multi Core => 25908
Fritz Chess Benchmark => 25.53/12254
CINEBENCH R11.5
CPU => 5.60 pts
CPU(Single Core) => 1.42 pts
CrystalMark 2004R3 => 318038
-
System Configuration
CPU: Intel Core i5-760
MB: GIGABYTE P55A-UD3P
DRAM: CORSAIR DOMINATOR-GT CMG4GX3M2A2000C8
VGA: ATI Radeon HD 5830
HD: CORSAIR CSSD-F40GB2 Raid0
POWER: be quiet! Straight Power E7 600W
Cooler: Mega Shadow Deluxe Edition
OS: Windows7 Ultimate 64bit
Default Performance
CPU 133.2 X 21 => 2797.2MHz
DDR3 1331.8 CL5 5-5-15 1T
Hyper PI 32M X4 => 13m 31.888s
CPUMARK 99=> 515
Nuclearus Multi Core => 16677
Fritz Chess Benchmark => 17.81/8549
CrystalMark 2004R3 => 244848
PCMark Vantage => 14057
Due to Turboost auto OC technology, the clock are not exactly the same in CPU-Z pictures.
Basic clock is 2.8GHz, it will floating between 2.8GHz to 3.4GHz by cores and CPU utilized ratio.
The performance is higher than Core i5-750 2.66GHz.
For the general users, i5-760 performance can handle most software.
Power Consumption Test
Standby - 67W
CPU Full Speed - 135W
i5-760 power consumption is impressive without OC, it should be related to enable C1E power saving feature.
Also the clock is only 2.8GHz and don’t support HT, the power consumption is pretty low.
Especially, even using ATI Radeon HD5830 VGA, the CPU full speed is only 135W.
OC Performance
First of all, referring to my BIOS set up for 200/2000.
BIOS Main Page
Set CPU clock to 200MHz and DRAM set up by quality.
The ratio in pic shows the DDR3 at 2000MHz.
CPU Feature
Normally when you are OC, you should disable the C1E features to avoid the voltage and clock floating.
Turbo Boost also needs to disable to find the CPU stabilized clock.
DDR3 Set Up Page
-
Currently, you can see most Intel CPU, price over 300USD, supports HT technology.
For example, LGA 1366 Core i7-930/950 or LGA 1156 Core i7-870/875K.
These 4 CPUs are all 4C8T and within the price range.
There was a Core i5-7500 in LGA 1156 platform. It’s pure 4C4T structure without HT.
The price was 6000NTD, around 200USD.
Recently, Intel launched one new code, 760.
No matter i5-750 or i5-760, it’s the highest C/P value Intel quad core CPU so far.
Since beginning, I was considering the parity quad core CPU for long time.
I also consider to change to entry quad core CPU.
For Intel product line, Core i5-760 exactly is the entry and parity quad core CPU.
Combo with P55 MB, the whole platform is middle range in the PC market.
CPU clock is 2.8GHz, supports Turbo Boost and can reach 3.46GHz.
Physical 4 Cores CPU is 4 threading, called 4C/4T.
45nm, L3 Cache is 8MB, the internet data shows the Max TDP is 95W.
The back mostly can recognize the revision and spec.
This Core i5-760 is Stepping 5/Revision B1
Intel 4 Cores processor coolers use copper bottom which is better heat dissipation performance.
P55 chipset is the best combo for this CPU, although H55 is also the other choice.
But H55 main design is for built-in GPU Core i3/i5 CPU, and it doesn’t support RAID.
If you really have budget concern, H55 is also a good solution.
This guide uses GIGABYTE P55A-UD3P, the price is higher than other entry P55 boards.
The spec and components are good level. The price is around 172USD.
3X USB Power, On/Off Charge USB connector supports On/Off Charge feature.
UD3P equips GIGABYTE main new features.
Lower-Left Corner
2 X PCI-E X16, ATI CrossFireX and the bandwidth is X16+X4.
2 X PCI-E X1
Realtek RTL8111E LAN Chip
Realtek ALC889 supports 7.1 channel and High Definition Audio/Dolby Home Theater Technology
Design in Taipei
Lower-Right Corner
6 X Blue SATAII, provide by P55, SATA2 supports RAID 0, RAID 1, RAID 5 and RAID 10
2 X White SATAIII, provide by Marvell 9128, SATA3, supports RAID 0, RAID 1
1 X IDE, provide by iTE IT8213
Dual BIOS, dual protection
Upper-Right Corner
4 X DIMM DDR3 supports 800/1066/1333/1600/2200(OC). The max capacity is DDR3 16GB.
Next is 24-PIN power connector
Upper-Left Corner
LGA 1156 CPU socket, CPU metal cover is electroplated.
UD3P uses 12 phases PWM, the upper part is 8PIN power connector.
IO
8 X USB 2.0
2 X USB 3.0(Blue)
1 X RJ-45 LAN
2 X eSATA(Yellow)
1 X S/PDIF Fiber/Coaxial output
1 X 1394a
2010 Mainstream DIY PC Reference – Intel Platform OC Performance Guide
in General hardware discussion
Posted
WindowsExperience Index - CPU 7.3
PCMark Vantage => 7701
After Core i3-540 OC to 4.14GHz, the performance increase 30% comparing to default 3.06GHz.
Also compare to previous AMD X4 640 CPU OC to 3.6GHz.
i3-540 reply on own higher performance and frequency, it only small behind most quad-core full load software.
In Nuclearus Multi and Core PCMark Vantage, Intel even leads.
Hyper PI 32M and CPUAMRK99 even have bigger gap due to Intel structure.
Temperature
System Idle - 34~36
CPUFull Speed - 77~79
Intel Burn Test v2.4，Stress Level Maximum
After OC, the idle temperature is similar to default.
Full Speed temperature rise about 20. The main reason is the original cooler too thin and CPU clock increase 1.1GHz after OC.
Due to 32nm manufacture, you just need to use better cooler, you can OC it to 4.4~4.6GHz without any issues.
Power Consumption
System Idle - 63W
CPU Full Speed - 110W
After OC, the idle power consumption increase 11W and Full Speed increase 27W.
The range is very small, but the CPU performance enhance obviously.
The power consumption of dual core plus 32nm is very impressive.
This Intel mainstream DIY PC guide is i3-540 and H55.
The previous AMD mainstream DIY PC guide is X4 640 and 880G.
Let’s review the main performance difference in 2 platforms again.
3D part, in non-OC condition, they are very similar, but Intel built-in GPU has better OC ability.
After OC GPU, its 3D performance is better than AMD 880G. The most inconvenient thing is after OC CPU/DRAM, the GPU OC capability will be lower.
880G doesn’t have this issue. So both platforms have different advantages.
CPU performance, Intel leads in single core and AMD leads in multi-core full speed mode.
The main reason is that Core i3 simulate HT at dual core mode.
But rely on 32nm manufacture and good OC capability, i3-540 after OC single core performance lead X4 640 a lot.
Even for multi-tasking, i3-540 also leads X4 640 in some applications.
These 2 platforms are similar price and level. It does take time to research before starting.
Includes Case, DVD-ROM to build a PC around 16500NTD and consider quality and performance, I use more high end configuration.
If you have limited budget, you can use cheaper H55, DDR3 2GX2 and 350W PSU.
The PC price will drop to 12500NTD, around 429USD. You can have a most entry Intel PC.
It takes weeks to finish these two 2010 DIY PC guide.
Windwithme will make 2011 guide with LGA 1155 platform.
Thanks for all readers and friends support in 2010. Hope next year the PC movement can be faster, and price can be lower.
Let’s look forward the new platform few months later.
This year, I only share two DC reviews. It’s too busy for me to share more DSLR. Hopefully, next year I can improve this.
This article is also in my blog WIND 3C. Any comments are always welcome.