
SteveRo
Members-
Posts
1084 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Everything posted by SteveRo
-
Please delete this thread - this item is sold, thanks!
-
Tested for one week - way too much video card for 1920x1200 I will probably drop back to a 970. $425. includes priority mail shipping, US shipping only
-
SteveRo - SSD - 2974 points AS SSD Benchmark
SteveRo replied to parsec's topic in Result Discussions
thanks! -
SteveRo - SSD - 3124 points AS SSD Benchmark
SteveRo replied to NATA 58's topic in Result Discussions
I don't understand your comment, this run was with four SSDs. -
What is wrong with this link? http://www.3dmark.com/pcmv/549232 I get "Validation error: A valid futuremark compare url is required if want to reach the PCMark Vantage Hall Of fame. As only 17 benchmark scores are better than you, you need to provide additional verification" when trying to submit - help!
-
dhenzjhen - 2x Xeon W5590 @ 4825.5MHz - 78sec 515ms wPrime 1024m
SteveRo replied to Moose83's topic in Result Discussions
yep, looks good, well done! -
Clarification in PCMark'05 about Tweaks // Tricks allowed
SteveRo replied to Sweet's topic in Benchmark software
Good afternoon Sir, With Areca 1880/4GB 15xR0 Acard 9010 when using 1x Sempron my max virus scan score is 300-400, actually I don't think I have ever hit 400 with it. edit - I stayed away from sb950 as it looked to me like raid expert was bugged for pcm05. edit2 - Correction - looks like I did get 408 once -
Clarification in PCMark'05 about Tweaks // Tricks allowed
SteveRo replied to Sweet's topic in Benchmark software
Mr. Moose, yes, agree. Mr. ElGappo, Sir, please delete this submission. I assume this was with (what is now illegal) sector size change? -
Moose83 - Sempron 145 @ 5306MHz - 23995 marks PCMark 2005
SteveRo replied to Moose83's topic in Result Discussions
Nice pics! I particularly like your shoes!! -
HWBOT R5 Bugs/Features 2.0 - Report bugs or request new HWBOT features here
SteveRo replied to Massman's topic in HWBOT Rev.5
Please fix - points not correct for 3x and 5x pcm05 - see: http://hwbot.org/benchmark/pcmark_2005/rankings?cores=3#start=0#interval=20 http://hwbot.org/benchmark/pcmark_2005/rankings?start=0#interval=20#cores=5#start=0 Thanks, Steve -
Clarification in PCMark'05 about Tweaks // Tricks allowed
SteveRo replied to Sweet's topic in Benchmark software
HDD sector size >512 bytes can get you VS 9000+ which is (soon to be officially) illegal and all submissions using sector size other than 512 should be deleted due to "altering the perceived speed of the benchmark program, tricking it to believe it ran faster ". -
Clarification in PCMark'05 about Tweaks // Tricks allowed
SteveRo replied to Sweet's topic in Benchmark software
Yes, powertoy (originally introduced to us by Master Pro) has been legal for sometime. -
Clarification in PCMark'05 about Tweaks // Tricks allowed
SteveRo replied to Sweet's topic in Benchmark software
You might want to wait for Master Pro's press release but I will venture a guess (my guess - not official!) - 1. Ramdisk is a no-no (as it always has been). 2. Irst or amd raid expert are fine provided sector size remains at 512 bytes. 3. SetLOD ok 4. Mouse movement ok. -
Clarification in PCMark'05 about Tweaks // Tricks allowed
SteveRo replied to Sweet's topic in Benchmark software
Mr. Moose, The rules say it is illegal when - "altering the perceived speed of the benchmark program, tricking it to believe it ran faster ". If you agree that changing sector size is "altering the perceived speed of the benchmark program, tricking it to believe it ran faster " - than you should delete those scores now, it shouldn't have anything to do with "... December when I rebench with high clocks." _____________________ -
Clarification in PCMark'05 about Tweaks // Tricks allowed
SteveRo replied to Sweet's topic in Benchmark software
Agree completely Mr. Moose, so you will delete your non-512 sector submits? -
Clarification in PCMark'05 about Tweaks // Tricks allowed
SteveRo replied to Sweet's topic in Benchmark software
I think that 1812 run was the highest vs I ever had, I doubt I will ever be able to get close to that again. edit - Probably done with Areca4GB/15xAcard but could have been onboard 4xC300 -
Clarification in PCMark'05 about Tweaks // Tricks allowed
SteveRo replied to Sweet's topic in Benchmark software
Mr. Pro, Can we at least get an official read on removing scores that are "tricking the benchmark into giving a score thats not real". -
Clarification in PCMark'05 about Tweaks // Tricks allowed
SteveRo replied to Sweet's topic in Benchmark software
I think a progress newspost might be good. -
Clarification in PCMark'05 about Tweaks // Tricks allowed
SteveRo replied to Sweet's topic in Benchmark software
"The standard sector size of 512 bytes for magnetic disks was established with the inception of the hard disk drive ..." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disk_sector -
Clarification in PCMark'05 about Tweaks // Tricks allowed
SteveRo replied to Sweet's topic in Benchmark software
Given your oc skill I think you will make quick work of me -
Clarification in PCMark'05 about Tweaks // Tricks allowed
SteveRo replied to Sweet's topic in Benchmark software
Yep, absolutely true, hopefully the wrapper can catch non-512 -
Clarification in PCMark'05 about Tweaks // Tricks allowed
SteveRo replied to Sweet's topic in Benchmark software
yes - I have been selling my storage stuff but not all of it - yet! -
Clarification in PCMark'05 about Tweaks // Tricks allowed
SteveRo replied to Sweet's topic in Benchmark software
Completely concur. Also, I recommend we do not preclude folks with pcie controllers (areca, lsi, high point, ...) or pcie SSDs - these should be allowed, provided they all keep sector size to 512.