yee245

Please add Asus B85M-G R2.0 https://valid.x86.fr/l66q7s

An alternate/second version the Xeon E3-1225 v3 should be added to the database as something like "Xeon E3 1225 v3 (HT)". There is an early version of this processor that shipped with hyperthreading enabled, and Intel disabled it on later chips. https://valid.x86.fr/8me9kh Additional details seem to be available on the LTT forums, including Intel's Product Change Notification: https://linustechtips.com/topic/47244-4-threads-or-8-threads-8-threads-version-of-xeon-e3-1225-v3-is-available-in-japan/

You can look at the OC Esports page. The bottom "half" of the page is all the submissions in the order they were subbed: https://esports.hwbot.org/#!/round/country cup 2023misc/5759/aquamark_dogpile_-_max_60_subs

Please add Dell 0TP412. Thanks. https://valid.x86.fr/gle8g4

For that Night Raid iGPU stage (https://hwbot.org/competition/country cup 2023GPU/stage/5732_3dmark_-_night_raid_-_igpu_amd), are laptop chips intended to be allowed to be allowed (e.g. the FP5, FP6, FT6, FP7, etc socket chips)?

Please add the Ryzen 5 5600X3D. https://valid.x86.fr/kdc3vq https://www.amd.com/en/products/cpu/amd-ryzen-5-5600x3d Thanks.

Please add Asus PN63-S1. Thanks. https://valid.x86.fr/y0iuwv

I think it was about 13.5 hours.

Here's my submission for lowest score for the competition. Benchmark set to run with affinity set to only 1 core, with the CPU-Z stress test running concurrently for most of the run.

I just didn't know if they needed to go into the database as two different options, given that they're different core configs (because, as you said, they're harvested from different cores, basically one with the L3 and one without). I was requesting the Phenom II X4 B55 to be added to the database, so I can submit my scores with it for Matt's quad core comp (as well as the X4 B40, even though I won't be subbing those scores to the comp). I figure I'm not supposed to submit it as either the X3 455 or the X2 B55. I can provide my own CPU-Z links as well: B40: https://valid.x86.fr/uwxc0e B55: https://valid.x86.fr/m2swm0 edit 2: ah, I see, I guess i haven't subbed unlocked core CPU stuff. it just goes under the original CPU type, just with unlocked core settings, which then show only in the filtered rankings individual score listings

Another one of the unlocked core CPUs... Phenom II X4 B55 It's the quad-core that's unlocked from an Athlon II X3 455 Looks like there are two different revisions (again, if it matters for the database) BL-C3 (Propus): https://valid.x86.fr/fhk8el RB-C3 (Deneb): http://valid.x86.fr/60x7b2

Phenom II X4 B40 It's the quad-core that's unlocked from an Athlon II X3 440 Looks like there are C2 and C3 steppings as well with different core specs (if it matters for the database) C2 (Propus): https://valid.x86.fr/bhtimc C3 (Deneb): http://valid.x86.fr/fsb79f

Nice job!

A final score (of any given benchmark) with "special" numbers, like all sequential 123, 123456, 6543, 345.678, etc., or all the same number 1111, 33.333, etc. Any timed benchmark that ends on an exact multiple of a second (e.g. 5.000s), or score-based ones that end on nice round numbers (e.g. Cinebench scores that are like 1000, 2000, 5000, etc).

It came up over on Discord and the more I was looking at some of the categories, the more I was curious what direction should be taken with regards to how the Nvidia professional/workstation/server GPUs should be categorized in the HWBOT database. As it is now, there are several categories/families that are sort of dedicated to these cards, including the NVS series, Quadro NVS series, Quadro RTX series, Quadro series, and Tesla series. Currently, there is a little bit of a mix of how the Nvidia "professional" cards appear to be categorized. Sometimes they are in their name-appropriate category (e.g. a Quadro RTX 5000 being in the Quadro RTX series), but other times, they are in their Geforce counterpart/equivalent category (e.g. the Quadro RTX 4000 is in the Geforce 2000 series), and other times, I think the GPU just has incorrect info about the specs/core and is thus placed in the wrong place entirely (e.g. the RTX A6000 being listed as having a TU102 core and put in the Geforce 2000 series instead of a GA102 core in either the Geforce 3000 or Quadro RTX families). I guess my question is which direction we'd want to take in regards to what the "right" place to categorize these GPUs. Do they get separated into their own Quadro series families (potentially similar to how TechPowerUp categorizes them with regards to their generations), or do they get moved back over with their Geforce "equivalent" (i.e. by core and/or architecture) families? I'd lean a little towards having more separated Quadro groupings, potentially even by architecture (which then gets into kind of not-as-nice naming separations, like how a potential "Quadro Kepler" family has some cards that are actually Maxwell cores because of cards like the K1200 and K2200, or by naming "conventions" (i.e. the letter before the numbering) the Quadro 410 and 4100 "should" be Fermi, but they're actually Kepler, but don't have a K with the number), but then that kind of just makes a potential ton of new separate GPU families, which then could just get unwieldy overall compared to just having one main "Quadro" family. But that said, it could at least shrink the overall "Quadro" family down if we separated off the Quadro FX family GPUs from the Quadro family GPUs (I think there are ~80 Quadro FX's out of the currently ~160 Quadros in that family the current database), and then I guess it would also be a matter if we wanted to separate off some small categories like the Quadro2 and Quadro4 series and potentially any other stragglers. And, also, I don't know if there are any other thoughts on the Geforce 1000 series grouping together both the Pascal (1000 series) and Turing (1600 series) GPUs and whether people would want to separate that into a 1000 series and a 1600 series, given how Country Cup was basically 16 series GPUs for that one GPUPI stage. But, that said, things are then treated differently on the AMD side. The AMD GPUs are separated just by their generation (GCN 1st/2nd/3rd/etc), where the Pro/workstation cards are just grouped in with the "consumer" parts. The AMD GPUs categories don't distinguish FirePro vs FireStream vs Radeon vs Radeon Instinct vs Radeon Pro vs Radeon Sky in the same way that the Nvidia ones are separated in the Geforce/NVS/Quadro/Tesla. Granted, it's just a difference in how they're (currently) categorized overall, where Nvidia's side is separated by their series and branding, but AMD's are just purely by architecture/generation (partly because of the difference in naming consistency across the generations (moreso on AMD's side)), and converting them both to having the same type of categorization could just be kind of time consuming for little gain. I do still think that, at least on the Nvidia side, there does need to be a little cleanup and shuffling of things, just given a couple things that I think are errors or are just in the wrong place or separating the Quadro FX off into its own separate category from the "normal" Quadro series (and maybe even potentially merging the "NVS series" in with the "Quadro NVS series"). I'm not sure if there are/were any specific reasons they are separated the way they are (NVS vs Quadro NVS, Quadro FX as part of Quadro, etc), or if it's just how it was and things were added over time and the category just gre large. I'd imagine we don't want to separate out the AMD categories into essentially consumer and workstation/server/compute categories/families given the likely time consuming nature of going through them all, but at least with the Nvidia ones, they're kind of already separated out a bit and would require a lot less shuffling. Somewhat related to the families of GPUs is also how they're separated out for competitions, but I think there's generally the "no workstation/server cards allowed" for most comps (at least ones for the GPU categories, since I don't think most people would care if I'm using a Quadro as my video output when running like superpi, especially if I don't even *have* to list it in the system hardware in the submission), but I feel like a lower end Radeon Pro, like say a WX3200, would go under the radar for a general comp, but people might be quicker to point out a Quadro T600 (even as "bad" as it would likely be for a given comp) as not being allowed because it's a workstation card compared to the Radeon Pro. For comps allowing by architecture, if workstation cards aren't allowed, it may be a little more ideal to have the Quadros off in their own categories (which still potentially "allows" AMD workstation cards to be subbed with, given they're grouped just by architecture, without manually setting competition limitations (based on my limited understanding of the comp engine)), but it would still allow for some of them to be used for those specific comps like Cheapaz where often times it's just picked by the core, which would then allow for random Quadros. But anyway, yeah, I figured I'd just see what other people's thoughts were, but also list a couple GPUs that I noticed/think are out of place (below). - Quadro FX 350M is listed in the Quadro NVS series, but should be in the Quadro series (or potential new Quadro FX series) - Quadro RTX 5000/6000/8000 are listed as RT102/104GL cores, but I think should be TU104/102 cores - Quadro RTX A6000 is listed as having a TU102 core, but I think it should be a GA102 core - Grid K1 is under Quadro series, but Grid K340 is under Geforce 600 series, but perhaps they should both just be under a new Grid family - NVS 5100M is under Quadro series, but should be under NVS Series - NVS 810 is under the Tesla series, but should be under NVS Series - Not sure how the Pascal/Turing/Ampere Quadros (both Quadro and non-Quadro branded) should be grouped (i.e. stay with Geforce 1000/2000/3000 or move over to Quadro/Quadro RTX) - Tesla T4 is under Geforce 2000 series, but perhaps should be moved to Tesla Series - Quadro FX Go1000 is under Geforce 5 series, but maybe should be moved to Quadro series (or a new Quadro FX series) - Geforce GTX 780 (2880 Shaders) is under Geforce 600 series, should this be under Geforce 700 series? - Geforce 830A is under Geforce 900 series, should this be under Geforce 800 series?