Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

mr.paco

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    820

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Posts posted by mr.paco

    MrPaco - Pentium 4 521 @ 4127.6MHz - 18532 marks PCMark 2005

    in Result Discussions

    Posted

    This is crazy.

    The very first point about this whole thing was if I cheated to get the score I did get.

    So if it was 1 I-Ram or 100 is not the point. The point is was it a lagit honest run.

    At this point my intrest is when the "BOT STAFF" makes their deccision, no matter YAY or NAY with what ever reason for the final decision, I would like them to make it perfectly clear here to everyone that based on my proof (video & screen shots provided) that I did not in any way deliberatly cheat on that run.

    Sure I'd love to have it approved but I'd rather loose the points than to ruin my shot/limited but clean reputation...

    Some may understand that & some may not but to all Thank you...

    MrPaco - Pentium 4 521 @ 4127.6MHz - 18532 marks PCMark 2005

    in Result Discussions

    Posted

    I think it's time for me to build a PCM05 rig again and test all OS on it, first time I saw XP faster than WindowsVista/7 for transparent windows test, good catch.

    Yup, thats why I take the time to run em on all 3 OSs, you just never know for sure. And yes on some setups, Vista would out do XP. There are factors that play a great role, such as 32bit or 64bit cpu, single or dual core, AMD or Intel, page set up, Raid driver n so on. And at the end just hope for a good stable run (OCin Gods willing :)) You get the idea ;)

     

    For your Windows 7 run you provided, you used the same windows media encoder as on your XP run ?

    Cause under windows 7 it's 2 times slower, aka 2400 kb/s vs 4400 kb/s

    Yes, same encoder #9 is the only one I use on all OSs.

    In fact that WIN7 run was done at just about the same OC as my original XP run. Different effects with different OSs. I dont know why :confused:but it is

     

    I saw guys having only 2~3 I-Ram and having same XP startup and HDD General usage as you, seems that having 8 I-Ram doesn't scale, if you have too much I-Ram feel free you know how to PM me :D

    Sure it happens, like I said it depends on the chip, your set up n so on. Its not easy, I get results with XP Startup n HDD General Usage at way over 300+ and sometimes the other way around with 000.042mb/s :eek:.

    If I do find myself with more I-Rams than needed, My team mates would come first but after that your the first one Christian :)

    MrPaco - Pentium 4 521 @ 4127.6MHz - 18532 marks PCMark 2005

    in Result Discussions

    Posted · Edited by mr.paco

    Hi MrPaco, please you run again this Pcmark'05 in XP ?, show this run, and sorry but this screenshot (Win 7) is too small, i dont see nothing :(

     

    You must understand that, no one has used so many i-rams, audio comp. is very high compared to others, but they have not used this configuration.

     

    Run again this '05 in XP, and show me this screen.

     

    Thanks so much

    Hello Sweet.

    I have no problem at all running it again. Setting it back up now...

    Sorry the WIN7 picture was too small, I didnt know how to attach an image here. See if this one is better.

    MrPaco - Pentium 4 521 @ 4127.6MHz - 18532 marks PCMark 2005

    in Result Discussions

    Posted · Edited by mr.paco

    Yes just to see what my run would look like under a different OS, I reran the same chip under WIN7 32bit with just about the same OC. From what I have learned here and @ home (CP) it would be a toss up when running PCM05 on a 64bit chip between WIN XP & VISTA with WIN7 giving the worst results for Transparent Windows & maybe some other subtests.

    I have included a screen shot of the new run on WIN7, pleas feel free to look it over & give your opinions.

    Like I said before; I made my run true, legit and honest to the best of my abilities with nothing forbidden. Its just one of those cases where you get just that right piece of hardware or have it set up just right where all the components just click together or the OCin Gods are with you, who knows, I just know I made an honest run. And I can rerun it again n again if you like.

     

    If he is ok to show hwbot staff how he managed to do such a score, then we will legit it

    I have no problem with that at all, but TELLING you & SHOWING you are two different things. Just tell me what would you need me to do.

     

    Did you test Transparent Windows on different systems? If you did you'd see that Vista is the fastest by a huge margin, Win7 is close behind and XP is much slower than both of them

    Yes I ALWAYS run my PCM05 on all 3 OS (XP, VISTA, WIN7)

    And you are wrong in one thing, WIN7 gives the WORST run of the 3 OSs for Transparent Windows. In fact WIN7 gives the worst scores period compared to XP & VISTA. For "ME" From "MY" tests.

    - Are you running the OS on the iRams? Or just using the iRams for the PCMark?

    - Can you test if there is any scaling in all those subtests?

    I use the I-Rams for the Bench HD tests.

    How would I test the scaling on the subtets? I'd be more than happy to if you could tell me how or what you mean.

    I am more than happy to give you any proof you request, Just let me know how to supply it to you and you got it.

    Also, hats of to MRPaco for a great storage subsystem! Xtreme for sure!

    Thank you Steve

     

    **And Thank you to everyone for your help n support in helping to clear this confusion up...

    I enjoy OCing/Benching, I gain nothing from trying to cheat. I will only end up cheating myself and hurting my team.

    MrPaco - Pentium 4 521 @ 4127.6MHz - 18532 marks PCMark 2005

    in Result Discussions

    Posted

    So if it was run under VISTA, there would have been no issue with my Transparent Windows? Thats interesting, I make all my PCMark runs on XP,VISTA & Win7 and keep my best run from the 3. I dont know what you mean by an unknown tweak, I just OC my GPU, CPU, Ram and go.

    As for the Audio & Video compression. I made no special adjustments. No changes were made, or replaced. I use Encoder9. And the only score limit I see in the rule is on WIN XP Start up of 220mb/s.

    And you got me on POWERTOY, I have no idea what that is (and please no one tell me to google it, I dont need to know what it is if its not allowed)

    The only thing I can say is I made a clean legit run.

    Bug reports : submission error

    in Support

    Posted · Edited by mr.paco

    Ticket ID: 1298

     

    Priority: High

     

    I am trying to make submissions in the Bot June Competition, but every time I try I get the following

     

    \"OOPS\" error:\r\n\r\nOops. Something went wrong.\r\n\r\nWe could blame this on you but it\'s most likely our crappy coding skills. You could try again or nudge our developpers for fixing this.\r\nDetails:\r\norg.springframework.web.multipart.MaxUploadSizeExceededException: Maximum upload size of 5000000 bytes exceeded; nested exception is org.apache.commons.fileupload.FileUploadBase$SizeLimitExceededException: the request was rejected because its size (8404729) exceeds the configured maximum (5000000)\r\nStack trace:\r\norg.springframework.web.multipart.commons.CommonsMultipartResolver.parseRequest(CommonsMultipartResolver.java:159)\r\norg.springframework.web.multipart.commons.CommonsMultipartResolver.resolveMultipart(CommonsMultipartResolver.java:138)\r\norg.springframework.web.servlet.DispatcherServlet.checkMultipart(DispatcherServlet.java:887)\r\norg.springframework.web.servlet.DispatcherServlet.doDispatch(DispatcherServlet.java:750)\r\norg.springframework.web.servlet.DispatcherServlet.doService(DispatcherServlet.java:719)\r\norg.springframework.web.servlet.FrameworkServlet.processRequest(FrameworkServlet.java:644)\r\norg.springframework.web.servlet.FrameworkServlet.doPost(FrameworkServlet.java:560)\r\njavax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:710)\r\njavax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:803)\r\norg.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:290)\r\norg.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:206)\r\norg.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationDispatcher.invoke(ApplicationDispatcher.java:630)\r\norg.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationDispatcher.processRequest(ApplicationDispatcher.java:436)\r\norg.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationDispatcher.doForward(ApplicationDispatcher.java:374)\r\norg.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationDispatcher.forward(ApplicationDispatcher.java:302)\r\norg.tuckey.web.filters.urlrewrite.NormalRewrittenUrl.doRewrite(NormalRewrittenUrl.java:195)\r\norg.tuckey.web.filters.urlrewrite.RuleChain.handleRewrite(RuleChain.java:159)\r\norg.tuckey.web.filters.urlrewrite.RuleChain.doRules(RuleChain.java:141)\r\norg.tuckey.web.filters.urlrewrite.UrlRewriter.processRequest(UrlRewriter.java:90)\r\norg.tuckey.web.filters.urlrewrite.UrlRewriteFilter.doFilter(UrlRewriteFilter.java:417)\r\norg.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:235)\r\norg.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:206)\r\norg.hwbot.web.filter.LocaleFilter.doFilter(LocaleFilter.java:155)\r\norg.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:235)\r\norg.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:206)\r\norg.hwbot.web.filter.CookieFilter.doFilter(CookieFilter.java:173)\r\norg.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:235)\r\norg.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:206)\r\norg.springframework.web.filter.HiddenHttpMethodFilter.doFilterInternal(HiddenHttpMethodFilter.java:77)\r\norg.springframework.web.filter.OncePerRequestFilter.doFilter(OncePerRequestFilter.java:76)\r\norg.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:235)\r\norg.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:206)\r\norg.springframework.web.filter.CharacterEncodingFilter.doFilterInternal(CharacterEncodingFilter.java:88)\r\norg.springframework.web.filter.OncePerRequestFilter.doFilter(OncePerRequestFilter.java:76)\r\norg.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:235)\r\norg.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:206)\r\norg.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperValve.java:233)\r\norg.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke(StandardContextValve.java:175)\r\norg.apache.catalina.authenticator.AuthenticatorBase.invoke(AuthenticatorBase.java:433)\r\norg.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValve.java:128)\r\norg.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(ErrorReportValve.java:102)\r\norg.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngineValve.invoke(StandardEngineValve.java:109)\r\norg.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter.service(CoyoteAdapter.java:286)\r\norg.apache.jk.server.JkCoyoteHandler.invoke(JkCoyoteHandler.java:190)\r\norg.apache.jk.common.HandlerRequest.invoke(HandlerRequest.java:283)\r\norg.apache.jk.common.ChannelSocket.invoke(ChannelSocket.java:767)\r\norg.apache.jk.common.ChannelSocket.processConnection(ChannelSocket.java:697)\r\norg.apache.jk.common.ChannelSocket$SocketConnection.runIt(ChannelSocket.java:889)\r\norg.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPool$ControlRunnable.run(ThreadPool.java:690)\r\njava.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619) \r\n\r\nI\

     

    I've tryed it with IE 7, 8, 9 & FireFox. Any help would be greatly appriciated.\r\nThank You...

    Videocard specifications requests : Please add 64bit version

    in Support

    Posted

    Ticket ID: 1279

     

    Priority: Medium

     

    I am not sure if this card is to be submitted it in the area you have now but the version I have is 64BIT & 64MB the catagory submissions there now have 128BIT & 128MB.\r\nIf not could you add this card?\r\n\r\nATI Mobility Radeon X300\r\n\r\nGPUZ VALIDATION: http://www.techpowerup.com/gpuz/hfdy7/\r\n\r\nCPUZ VALIDATION: 1844469.png\r\n\r\nIf something else is needed, please let me know.\r\nThank you for you help n time...

×
×
  • Create New...