Moose83
Members-
Posts
3506 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Everything posted by Moose83
-
We have an Poll, there you can vote for or against the bench;) No need to repeat in every message you hate it and want it dies...
-
The official HWBOT OC Challenge October 2012: "October Rush" thread.
Moose83 replied to Massman's topic in HWBOT Competitions
Is open till morning 00:00 -
Again. This is tweaking threat! You hate this bench, thats your Problem;) But then get away here, keep your mind and shut up...
-
The official HWBOT OC Challenge October 2012: "October Rush" thread.
Moose83 replied to Massman's topic in HWBOT Competitions
For ivy stage must the bench run on integratet gma or can an normal gpu used? -
Congratz man...you only dislike this bench, so leave it, or play it! In pcm05 Software was and is more than Hardware... it is an hdd Benchmark, not an i have a 6ghz+ CPU... So lets get topic, read threat name, and lets put this comments to other place;)
-
Maybee you should look a while back my friend... remember Bob tweak? Your teammate discoverd it and you played the game... And now you change to pcm05 haters...because you cant follow all the Software... awsome going...
-
The official HWBOT OC Challenge October 2012: "October Rush" thread.
Moose83 replied to Massman's topic in HWBOT Competitions
Yeah, 3850 for ATI, but when NVidia must be used...i need an 7800GS...Same is with AMD...or Intel So i need 2 Mainboards and 2 Cards;) -
The official HWBOT OC Challenge October 2012: "October Rush" thread.
Moose83 replied to Massman's topic in HWBOT Competitions
No fun for my banc account I have to prepare more stuff, than i need -
The official HWBOT OC Challenge October 2012: "October Rush" thread.
Moose83 replied to Massman's topic in HWBOT Competitions
For AGP stage are there some limits? I mean CPU clock, manufactor or something else? -
Thats only Windows Settings, and Registry;) When score is say 40 pages, this tweak pushs it to 50 pages. And thats without replacing anything:)
-
dentax - Phenom II X6 1100T BE @ 4335MHz - 0sec 0ms SuperPi
Moose83 replied to Moose83's topic in Result Discussions
Mem tab is still missing, please rerun! -
Cool, you wrote your own Wordpad:) If you have maybee seen, there is an big difference between your webpage tweak, an mine. I think i use your variante, but the rest is only windows settings;)
-
Dont know One page back there was talking about more than 10% Tweak must be cheat I also have an 30% Webpage Tweak, so must be cheat too... You know Genieben, with the TE supertweak we can set any score we want, if i want only 800pages, so i did so:)
-
We must talk about an new System for PCMark. Gluvocio will answer soon, he has Problem to login into the forum;) What is thinking about 2 PCMark Leagues? Like Enthustiast and OC League. One League for the supertweaks with WR Points. And an seperate League for Non-Supertweaks-Users The bencher must deside while submit to hwbot wich league he goes;) What is thinking about this methode? Its allways too late to delete all supertweak scores! You cant say to all, hey, supertweaked runs will be deleted
-
Yeah, i know, the other subtest work like multiplikator on score. I have try to get Win 7 look as XP, but TW did not run
-
I only have seen 350k from him on 2600k. In 960T is 180k with stock clocks. I dont know what this trick is... I never scored 100k, still far away
-
The Tweaks i know i have told to Chris. But i dont know 180k TW, 300mill MA. For Web page i did the same i told to Chris, but 30% i score more only with some OS Tweaks;)
-
I had never this message during submit. I searched now for it and found this: Time measuring inaccurate This message indicates funny business with the system clock during benchmark run. In most cases, this means that, no, you cannot cheat in 3DMark by adjusting Windows timers during benchmark run or otherwise tampering with the measurements done by the benchmark. If this message persists and you have not done anything out of the ordinary, it may indicate a hardware issue with the real time clock of your system or a presence of a background program that somehow twists the time-space continuum of your operating system in such a way that this anti-cheat detection is tripped.