Antinomy

Outstanding, CherV!

For 16 cores, not threads. SMT doesn't impact core count category.

Same here, Karl :-( Thank you!

Ticket ID: 1797 Priority: Medium Samsung NP355V4C-S01RU\r\nhttp://valid.canardpc.com/8721in\r\n\r\nThank you in advance!

Very nice! Now try to reach GraduS's goal to get <1 min.

I might know the answer. wPrime greatly improves from SSE making a Thoroughbred rip a Thunderbird more than 50% IIRC. But your board might not initialize SSE on Barton (yes, SSE on A-XP was an optional feature that required enabling by BIOS). You can run WCPUID to check whether SSE is enabled (CPU-Z might only show that it's supported by CPU, not actually working). And is you find WCPUID with plugins, there's a plugin to enable SSE on A-XP. Try to turn it on and check again.

Very impressive yet some space for improvement left ;-)

I think you've messed km/h and m/h. 50km/h is not even medium. Right near my job. Talk about windy, yeah P.S. still very warm here - +7 right now and 11-13 at day. Can still go out in a T-shirt. Very unusual for autumn.

Not in my collection yet Not the only AOpen board with vacuum tube on it. It's not high end audio - same old cheapy Realtek but with output run through a vacuum tube. The interesting thing is that these boards used vacuum tubes made in USSR At least, some of them.

Not standard stock but air cooling yes it is. Until you've mentioned AGP benching I thought - why not throw this junk and buy a better board? Nice recap.

Both desktop and mobile Sandy/Ivy bridges share the same GPU (HD3000/4000).

Ticket ID: 1791 Priority: Medium Please, add Asus X55VDR.\r\nhttp://valid.canardpc.com/hs912g

Not bad, but not for cascade.

HP 1966: http://valid.canardpc.com/h5fr7s Thank you in advance!

TPU is an pretty old team. IIRC even back to the days of 3DMark HOF, maybe not. Wish you luck. Top 100 is easy to get with several active members.

Will try to check tomorrow. The F7 allowed to save the result and HWBot decrypted it just fine.

Running on Intel+NV on Win8 the 2.27 Aqua. Test runs normally, but after that goes nothing - the result window doesn't appear, the process just eats resources without any actions. Or should I wait for more? Say, half an hour?

Thank you! Forgot one more to ask: Intel Advanced/ML (Marl): http://valid.canardpc.com/2897805

Ticket ID: 1784 Priority: Medium A-trend ATC-1020: http://valid.canardpc.com/2899796\r\nLucky star LS-54CE (VX): http://valid.canardpc.com/2897730\r\nThere does exist a LS-54CE on 430FX chipset\r\nPC Partner AM-430TX: http://valid.canardpc.com/2897437\r\nPC chips M570: http://valid.canardpc.com/2897732\r\nSpring circle ST 586 rev. 566: http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=2897731\r\nThere\'s a number of different ST 586 boards on different chipsets differed by revision so revision is important (bad move of the vendor).\r\nhttp://www.elhvb.com/mobokive/archive/Spring%20Circle/mainboard.htm\r\n\r\nZida 5DXP: http://valid.canardpc.com/2897435

Thank you, Karl!

Ticket ID: 1783 Priority: Medium Please, add\r\nAcer JV50TR - http://valid.canardpc.com/2875336\r\nSony SVZ1311X9RX - http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=2872559\r\nECS P4VXASD2+ - http://valid.canardpc.com/2875396\r\nGigabyte IPE1000MK - http://valid.canardpc.com/2875335\r\n\r\n\r\nAnd please, fix the name of this board: http://www.hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/tuscon_tc430hx/\r\nit\'s codename is \"Tucson\", not Tuscon

Fugger on HWBot? Now that's a surprise after all these years.

Thank you, Karl! I've got some more to come.

Ticket ID: 1779 Priority: Medium This link: http://hwbot.org/hardware/processors#key=intel_xeon\r\nshows Pentium 3 Xeon which should instead be available at:\r\nhttp://hwbot.org/hardware/processors#key=intel_pentium_3\r\nWhile in Pentium 3 (http://hwbot.org/hardware/processors#key=intel_pentium_3) there are Pentium 2 Xeon which should be in http://hwbot.org/hardware/processors#key=intel_pentium_2\r\n\r\nThese three Xeon models:\r\nhttp://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/xeon_3.0ghz_paxville/\r\nhttp://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/xeon_7020_2.66ghz_paxville/\r\nhttp://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/xeon_7030_2.8ghz_paxville/\r\nare in Pentium 3 family whereas they should be in Xeon family and Xeon subfamily.\r\n\r\nI assume, the subfamily properties for the corresponding family doesn\'t work for models in the subfamily. That\'s a pity for the programmers \r\n\r\nSame goes for http://hwbot.org/hardware/processors#key=intel_pentium_1\r\nthe Pentium Pro models shouldn\'t be there.\r\nAnd as for http://hwbot.org/hardware/processors#key=intel_pentium_4\r\nall the socket 603/604 Xeons shouldn\'t be there.

Excellent! Congratulations.