topdog

thanks knopflerbruce

wprime score seems lot too fast http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=924589 validation link links to wPrime v200 submitted on 25/Nov/2009 03:10:15 but it was scanned by hwbot on 24-11-2009 05:14 Screenshot looks photoshopped.....CPU-Z corners are round at top and square at bottom

thanks

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=887965 are camera shots allowed?

I've already posted about this here http://www.hwbot.org/forum/showthread.php?t=3467 But after further searching I found this http://www.hwbot.org/browseHardwareProcessors.do?cpuSubFamilyId=171 There are two listed with 125 watt and 140 watt

This still hasn't been resolved, people are submitting scores from the same processor into two categories for example : http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=887617 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=885457

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=886852 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=886850

Ticket ID: 472 Priority: High When you type 965 into the processor box the Phemom 965 comes up twice and scores have been submitted on both as different processors

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688137 no resolution

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=682704 Are photos allowed ?

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=681627 512mb in 256mb category http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=692932 Warpy no proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=692671 Warpy screenshot shows 512mb in 256mb category http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=692583 Warpy again http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690637 Warpy no proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690475 Warpy no proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688443 Warpy no proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688440 Warpy no proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688435 Warpy no proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=687545 Warpy screenshot shows 512mb in 256mb category http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=687086 Warpy no proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=686663 Warpy 512 in screenshot http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=686660 Warpy no proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=685682 Warpy no proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=681643 Warpy no proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=683327 Warpy no proof

Here's some more for you All the results below have been entered in the GeForce 8800 GT 256 Mb category but they are GeForce 8800 GT 512 Mb video cards http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=694506 orb link shows 512mb not 256mb, zotac dont make 256mb version http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=702117 no verification image or link found, and it's a photo http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=698163 check the screenshot http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=681627 512mb card in description and forum post http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=693492 cannot see any proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=689874 no proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=696760 no proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688713 no proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=692734 no proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=681592 no proof it's 256mb (palit dont make 8800GT 256mb) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=689103 no proof it's 256mb http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690436 no proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688110 512mb in screenshot http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=693902 no proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=689876 Leadtek WinFast PX8800GT-512M in forumpost http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=693410 512mb in forumpost http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=687445 512mb in description

Thank you, I'll go as find some more for you

Try again, thanks

All the results below have been entered in the GeForce 8800 GT 256 Mb category but they are GeForce 8800 GT 512 Mb video cards http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=693360 512 in description http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=691553 512 in description http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=691036 512 in description http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=685349 512 in description http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=693407 512 in description http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=687754 512 in description http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690897 no proof but other benchmarks was with 512 mb http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=689963 no proof that it is 256 mb http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=684795 no proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=682976 no proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=691554 512 in description http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=694148 ATI Radeon 9800 XT in futuremark link, and screenshot of GPU_Z displays 8800 GT 512 Mb card http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=694319 Same user as above but different team, ATI Radeon 9800 XT in futuremark link, and screenshot of GPU_Z displays 8800 GT 512 Mb card http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=681706 no proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=686510 no proof, sig in forumpost shows 8800 GT 512 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=687443 Single Water Cooled EVGA 8800GT 512 indescription http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=684791 no proof that it is 256 mb http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=682971 same user as above, no proof that it is 256 mb http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=694729 futuremark link shows 512 mb http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=691322 512 in description http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688062 same user as above 512 in description http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=689175 no proof that it is 256 mb http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=682877 futuremark link shows 512 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=681602 no proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=687795 futuremark link shows 512 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=691080 futuremark link shows 512 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=689105 same user as above http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=687509 512 in description and futuremark link http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=691113 no proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=691582 futuremark link shows 512 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690902 no proof that it is 256 mb http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688346 same as above http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=682399 no proof that it is 256 mb http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=687872 no proof that it is 256 mb http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=681627 512 in description http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=693497 screenshot of GPU_Z displays 8800 GT 512 Mb http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=693505 screenshot of GPU_Z displays 8800 GT 512 Mb http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=693492 no proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=692932 no proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=692671 screenshot of GPU_Z displays 8800 GT 512 Mb http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=692583 no proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690637 no proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690475 no proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688443 no proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690718 512 in description http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688440 no proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688435 no proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=687545 screenshot of GPU_Z displays 8800 GT 512 Mb http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=687086 no proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=691910 512 in description http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=686677 no proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=686956 no proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=686663 screenshot of GPU_Z displays 8800 GT 512 Mb http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=686660 no proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=685682 no proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=681643 no proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=681637 no proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=683327 no proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690540 no validation http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=687667 no proof 8800 512 in sig http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=689874 no validation http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=682629 futuremark link shows 512 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688427 512 in description http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=694156 no proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=683841 futuremark link shows 512 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=685335 512 in description http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=689196 futuremark link shows 512 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=685404 futuremark link shows 512 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688713 no proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688058 512 in description http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=692734 Gainward 8800GT GS http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=682400 no proof, sig in forumpost shows 8800 GT 512 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=693386 512 in description http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=691370 no proof that it is 256 mb http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690436 not enough proof Sorry for the long list but I just want my trophies back

I've just noticed he's still got one result with a 256 mb 8800 GT that should be 512 mb still up http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690897 thanks

Nice Work Massman

Racuch has posted the following benchmarks as seen in this link http://www.hwbot.org/user.do?userId=11402 It shows that he's using a GeForce 8800 GT 256 Mb but if you check his screenshot for 3DMark06, rivatuner shows it clearly as 8800 GT512mb http://img120.imageshack.us/img120/5717/3dm2k6racuch18144pktrr3.jpg same with 3DMark05 GPU-Z shows it as 512mb http://img179.imageshack.us/img179/1232/3dm2k528167pktracuchqg8.jpg Same again in 3DMark03 http://img244.imageshack.us/img244/3073/3dm2k352569pktracuchfv7.jpg 3DMark01 it is hidden in the screnshot http://img184.imageshack.us/img184/2298/3dm2k188603pktracuchty0.jpg Aquamark score looks unreal for 8800GT 256mb as videocard overclock compared to other GeForce 8800 GT 256 Mb seems way to high http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=691552